Summary: Is there any way using group policy to force windows xp to adjust for best performance? (i.e right click my computer > properties > Advanced > Perfor...
Summary: OK - machine manufacturers and software companies will all tell you what the "minimum" requirements are to run their product. But let's face facts - I...
Summary: Pingless - I don't know if this is exactly what you're looking for, but it may help. Go to system properties (right-click My Computer | Properties) an...
Summary: If they're winXP you should use the fix that microsoft provides and push it with a windows update server (if you have one) If it's windows 2000, it's ...
Summary: windows server 2003 is a server OS. and server can only have ONE OS for its best performance. therefore, windows server 2003 is design in such a way t...
Summary: I have a system with the following specs: K8n-e Deluxe Mobo AMD64 3200+ 1gb ram 9200se radeon And I recently got my hands on Vista/lonhorn Beta, I am...
Summary: There isnt an "upgrade" path from Standard edition to Enterprise edition like there is from 2000 server to 2003 server. you could possibly do a multi...
Summary: Do you mean that the shared ressource files/directory list is locally cached? Where is this option? This is a strange behavior. Few weeks ago during a...
Summary: I run NT4.0 and I plan to upgrade to SBS 2003. I know that the SBS 2003 package enterprise edition, comes with Exchange 2003, ISA 2000, SQL 2000, ......
Summary: Will 2 of these make a good domain controller? http://i11.ebayimg.com/07/i/000/83/... I am looking forward to save power since I don't wanna waste ele...
Summary: Correct...You technically don't even need a front end server. That is if you don't mind opening up your internal mailbox server directly to the inter...
Summary: For strict performance, very little difference I believe. But you should definately give each individual user their own user account, for no other rea...
Summary: This whole discussion no offense to anyone involved is pretty absurd. #1. There is no mention geographically where this job is located. You have to ...
Summary: Also, if it's a DNS server, make sure for optimal performance no other nodes are pointing to it for DNS. "Enough, enough bowing down to disillusion! H...
Summary: Your server should have dual NIC's. One external (internet) and one internal (LAN). The external should be either set to DHCP (if you get your IP in...
Summary: I think you are going overboard but it will be great fun and training. I would wonder why you use PLESK. You will have to use event viewer and for sur...
Summary: You don't use clustering for domain controllers. DC's are multimaster in Windows 2000/2003. Simply promote it to a DC in the domain, and let AD repl...
Summary: Personally, for this small a setup, I wouldn't bother with a domain. If it were me, I'd just keep it as a workgroup. I'm trying to get a server up an...
Summary: In a word: yes. In general you'd want two NICs for best practice, but you can use just one. Simply set your NIC to have a static IP address (network ...
Summary: To Jefro: Hey Jefro, thank you also for your reply. With this scenario, we unfortunately have limited ability to play with the software/hardware, bein...
Summary: That's terriable back- up for a system! to get an entire back -up including your OS go to (if you have windows) back- up exe and go to full back- up. ...
Summary: Consider self signed certificates and install on each system, change often for best security. If using network shares secure by ntfs file permissions....
Summary: I'm going to be buying my own server and running my own web hosting business. If I buy Windows Server 2003, what's the best edition I should buy? Here...
Summary: I need to get the MCP certification for Win. Serv. 2003, but I'm not sure which one. There are quite a few variations for this... Managing, Maintaini...
Summary: Hi All Quick question on "best practice" for DNS. We have two servers running DNS on our LAN, I'll call them Server1 and Server2. Both are on pretty m...
![[higher confidence]](http://static.computing.net/img/AT-red_x.gif)
- higher confidence, ![[lower confidence]](http://static.computing.net/img/AT-black_x.gif)
- lower confidence
