Summary: I’ve got a question that I have never tried for myself, but I’m sure a few of you have with your AMD processors in the past. If the minimum requir...
Summary: ok, i got a ga-7zxr but it wont run at fsb133 which means my Amd xp1700 wont run at full speed, now i had a thundrbird 1.0 ghz in b4 at 100mhz, will i...
Summary: I really don't have ANITHING against Intel or AMD, I've had both! But from what I've heard Intel has better selling and AMD better performance! It's r...
Summary: Yep. XP2100 runs at roughly 2.2 ghz performance. It gets confusing. the older p4 (400mhz FSB) will be beaten by it's AMD XP equivalent. The newer p4 w...
Summary: Zroc's post (link below) on hardforum.com is the mother of all amd vs p4 vs varying fsb benchmarks. Many review sites have cut & pasted from his post...
Summary: Most people say AMD's perform a little bit higher, but that's the jist of it. They market their cpu's as 2400 to tell you it's relative to a 2.4GHz b...
Summary: A Celerons are very slow and cost the same as AMD XP's, so ignore them and their Ghz rating, it's just a marketing ploy to scam the ignorant. P4's a...
Summary: i dont understand why AMD cpus are alot less expensive than Intel cpus. when i got my 2800 barton, it was around 145$$. The intel 2.8 is around 230$...
Summary: I have a Athlon XP 2100+ ( 1.73GHZ ) and in some benchmarks it has done much better than a P4 2.5GHZ Can't beat AMD in performance :) What ever make ...
Summary: Mike, the K6-2 is AMD's Pentium II equivalent. By clock speed alone in your post, it would be the AMD cpu. Performance wiise, I have never compared th...
Summary: that is the normal clock speed of the 3000 chip, ben. AMD use performance ratings when naming their chips. In other words, the 3000+ has roughly the p...
Summary: AMD's perform very well, TRUE but before you go that route take a look at the 1.26 PIII Tualatin with 512k cache. These chips have the .13 core, an...
Summary: i would say go with option 1. it does have the hypermemory on the video, but o well, you have 1 gig to use. the amd will perform better. that cpu i...
Summary: Intel may run cooler, but for the money, AMD offers way more performace for the buck. You can spend the saved cash from the intel and spend it on goo...
Summary: i was wanting to know if a amd processor wud be better i belive the machine will take a 200 mhz processor will the amd out perform cyrix processor ...
Summary: Anyone running dual cpus have any advice or things to say about them. Would love to hear anything I could about it. What is a Good dual processor boar...
Summary: Unless you have a mobile CPU, your 2400+ is not a Barton...the Barton core started with the 2500+. Your 2400+ was designed to run at 2000MHz (15 x 133...
Summary: Intel lists its CPUs by clock speed...AMD uses "performance rating". I don't know the specifics on how AMD arrives at these numbers...but for instance...
Summary: the point is...AMD is better...let us think it over....1.8 AMD Athlon XP...running neck to neck with NOTE!..a Pentium 4 2.2ghz...running 400mhz FSB an...
Summary: I agree with you. One problem is these Joystick Jockeys (read that ANY way you want) are never satisfied with off the shelf performance. Of course thi...
Summary: -------------------------- >>Derk wrote >>LOL "Intel is surpassed AMD now" I dont know who you herd that from but that a bunch of BS. Intel's fastest ...
Summary: AMD systems perform best when the CPU & RAM are running in sync (both at the same bus speed). To be able to accomplish that, you'd need at least PC320...
Summary: Back in the socket 7 days, you could test a Pentium 233, then test an AMD K6/233 on the exact same system. The only thing that changed was the CPU, so...
Summary: The 3200+ barton (2.2ghz) is worse than the 3.2ghz p4. But a 2400+ (2.0ghz) xp was better than a 2.4ghz p4. AMD overrates the barton's cache, piggy...
Summary: good advice above - amd 32bit perform badly when running async, stick with a 100fsb cpu. I used to be a member of the pc chips lottery support forum u...
![[higher confidence]](http://static.computing.net/img/AT-red_x.gif)
- higher confidence, ![[lower confidence]](http://static.computing.net/img/AT-black_x.gif)
- lower confidence
