Computing.Net > Forums > Windows XP > XP - To reinstall or not? - HELP

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

XP - To reinstall or not? - HELP

Reply to Message Icon

Name: MikeC
Date: December 14, 2001 at 06:41:01 Pacific
Comment:

I upgraded from ME to XP home edition but not a clean install. My system has some problems, modem, a bit sticky and won't shutdown without plugging out the power.

Should I reformat and do a clean intall? Would it make any difference to performance, reliability, etc?



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: k_semler
Date: December 14, 2001 at 10:16:23 Pacific
Reply:

When I installed XP on my machine, I did an Fdisk and completely reformatted the harddrive. (not exactly by choice, I had a virus on my machine). but, the only problem I had so far, is that XP thinks that my modem is a T1 connection, but it is only a 56k US robotics. it works though. The best part about XP clean installation, is you han format the hard drive to NTFS. it is more stable than FAT32. I have not had 1 program crash on me yet. As to when I had ME, I had a program crash at least once every 4 hours. I reccomend a clean install, it is alot more stable than upgrading from previous versions of windows.


0

Response Number 2
Name: ukgeoff
Date: December 14, 2001 at 11:43:37 Pacific
Reply:


A clean install is recommened for XP rather than an upgrade...In microsoft's words..


0

Response Number 3
Name: phatphunky
Date: December 14, 2001 at 12:47:01 Pacific
Reply:

Here's my 2 cents...

Microsoft has never been able to provide the public with an OS that will upgrade a previous OS without a glitch. When I did some research, at Microsoft's website, most software I have will work in XP but must be re-installed. Now, why would you perform an upgrade, just to have to re-install the software? A clean install is recommended as stated above.

By the way, if, and I mean if, you're wondering why XP does not crash, I'll tell you. Someone was able to hack into Microsoft, it was on the news, and got the source code for Windows... this means that if Microsoft did not release a stable OS, someone else could and would have.


0

Response Number 4
Name: Craig Carrigan
Date: December 14, 2001 at 12:58:41 Pacific
Reply:

Actually, code written by MS would need to be fully documented in order for any part of it to be used in the formation of a new OS. And as any programmer knows, full documentation is the least of your worries, especially when you are working on something as large as an operating system. With millions of lines of code, most likely 1/3 of them are undocumented. And I'd be surprised if the programmers could figure out what the undocumented code was, much less someone who hacked them and downloaded it.

My 2 cents


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Related Posts

See More







Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows XP Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: XP - To reinstall or not? - HELP

XP To ME or 98se www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/xp-to-me-or-98se/159525.html

To Partition or Not To Partition? www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/to-partition-or-not-to-partition/90526.html

to upgrade or not to upgrade? www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/to-upgrade-or-not-to-upgrade/3049.html