Computing.Net > Forums > Windows XP > XP or 98?

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

XP or 98?

Reply to Message Icon

Name: David Ireland
Date: June 17, 2005 at 14:17:56 Pacific
OS: XP SP2
CPU/Ram: p4-3ghz/1gb
Comment:

Hello, i have an old laptop. It's an IBM Thinkpad 380Z (Pentium 2, 233mhz, 92mb ram) What OS would be more efficient dealing with speed and start up time: XP or 98SE?

Thanks, Dave.



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: Lijiman
Date: June 17, 2005 at 14:32:55 Pacific
Reply:

You have almost the absolute minimum system requirements. I don't think its worthwhile to put XP on it. However, it would work.

• PC with 300 megahertz or higher processor clock speed recommended; 233 MHz minimum required (single or dual processor system);* Intel Pentium/Celeron family, or AMD K6/Athlon/Duron family, or compatible processor recommended

• 128 megabytes (MB) of RAM or higher recommended (64 MB minimum supported; may limit performance and some features)

• 1.5 gigabytes (GB) of available hard disk space*

• Super VGA (800 x 600) or higher-resolution video adapter and monitor

• CD-ROM or DVD drive

• Keyboard and Microsoft Mouse or compatible pointing device

AMD Athlon 64 3500+ socket 939
1 GIG PC3200 DDR RAM
2x120 GIG 7200PRM HD's SATA/RAID 0
PNY Nvidia 6800 128MB
Lite-On DVD+-RW DL



0

Response Number 2
Name: Rich Mentzel
Date: June 17, 2005 at 14:34:48 Pacific
Reply:

I would try 98 as it is so much more efficient OS, and you might have to upgrade your bios to do this. If iot gives you headaches going in than 98 is for you, but I have put XP into marginal situations like this and it has run real well.

Rich M
www.kickenhardware.net


0

Response Number 3
Name: XpUser
Date: June 17, 2005 at 14:37:17 Pacific
Reply:

Of course XP will work on the 233mhz, 93mb RAM PC but with severe constraints (limited or no multitasking capabilities). If you want to have all the bells and whistles of Windows, use 98SE.

i_XpUser


0

Response Number 4
Name: blackbill
Date: June 17, 2005 at 14:55:42 Pacific
Reply:

I owned the laptop you mentioned previous to the one I have now... Go with 98, the laptop will work with XP, but at about the pace paint drying on a rainy day.

With XP you will also have problems with random shut downs. Took a while to figure it out but it ended up being a conflict between XP and BIOS. To get around it I had to force XP to install as a STANDARD COMPUTER instead of PORTABLE COMPUTER. This of course buggers up standbyby, hybernate and a few other things.


0

Response Number 5
Name: Dirty_Sanchez
Date: June 17, 2005 at 15:52:23 Pacific
Reply:

either way, htink about adding some memory if you dull down xp it'll run 'okay' but, 98SE would definately be quicker.


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: PZERO
Date: June 17, 2005 at 23:06:47 Pacific
Reply:

You'll want 98 for speed.


0

Response Number 7
Name: David Ireland
Date: June 18, 2005 at 07:09:18 Pacific
Reply:

Thanks Everyone.

Dave.


0

Response Number 8
Name: jimminy
Date: June 28, 2005 at 20:05:56 Pacific
Reply:

Have you considered Linux? It will be more work at first (primarily because of the learning curve), but a properly configured Debian installation will likely outperform a comparable Windows installation on your hardware.


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows XP Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: XP or 98?

Win XP or 98 (I play games) www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/win-xp-or-98-i-play-games/47330.html

run win ME or 98 under win XP www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/run-win-me-or-98-under-win-xp/38507.html

Packard Bell - XP, or updated 98? www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/packard-bell-xp-or-updated-98/12057.html