Computing.Net > Forums > Windows XP > XP home vs XP prof..

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

XP home vs XP prof..

Reply to Message Icon

Name: marksyph
Date: March 22, 2006 at 23:57:21 Pacific
OS: XP
CPU/Ram: Pentium 4 1.8Ghz/256RAM
Product: ECS Elite group
Comment:

which is better? Windows XP home edition or professional?



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: amdathlonxp2000
Date: March 23, 2006 at 00:10:29 Pacific
Reply:

Windows XP Home Edition is designed for home users XP Pro is designed for buiseness and power user so It has more features that people like that may use.


0

Response Number 2
Name: Lupin3rd
Date: March 23, 2006 at 00:45:33 Pacific
Reply:

Essentialy as amdathlonxp2000 said Pro is for buiseness so it has better security i.e it comes with it's own ability to encrypt data. Also it has the ability to remove Simple File Sharing and have group and user polices as well as act as a server in small office environmetns. (like 10-20 machines). Plus pro needs an 266Mhz CPU minimum where as Home needs a 233Mhz :P. Essentialy Home is good for as it's name states home and pro is for advanced work features and power users.


0

Response Number 3
Name: retroguy
Date: March 23, 2006 at 01:32:17 Pacific
Reply:

i'll add: pro supports active directory, home doesn't. almost always home users use and benefit from peer-to-peer networks, so xp home works fine. but occasionally a home user wants to use a windows server, and then there can be problems, when the server is set up for active directory. this is mainly relevant for people who are considering, or doing, business from a home office.

"If we don't succeed, we run the risk of failure." - BILL CLINTON


0

Response Number 4
Name: fitzov
Date: March 23, 2006 at 05:16:07 Pacific
Reply:

In ohter words, XP Home only lacks a few things that most people never use anyway. It's pure marketing hype for MS to even have two OS--more people will go for Pro because it sounds better and they will pay more money.


0

Response Number 5
Name: Lupin3rd
Date: March 24, 2006 at 00:06:25 Pacific
Reply:

Thats true but you think it's redundant to ahve 2 versions of XP well vista has i think 3 or 4 as well as Longhorn for server comps :P. Talk about money grabbing.


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: retroguy
Date: March 25, 2006 at 12:36:25 Pacific
Reply:

actually in my experience, 2 versions wasn't enough, because XP Home was still too bloated and complicated for many home users. There's so much in there that a very basic PC user doesn't use. There should be a "Windows Lite" which is the simplest to use of them all. Well, that's my 5c.

"If we don't succeed, we run the risk of failure." - BILL CLINTON


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Help: audio stops working Windows movie maker 5.1



Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows XP Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: XP home vs XP prof..

Compare XP Home with XP Professional www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/compare-xp-home-with-xp-professional/179765.html

xp home reloaded in laptop but no reboot www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/xp-home-reloaded-in-laptop-but-no-reboot/180063.html

reinstall Windows XP home onto Asus Ee PC 900 www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/reinstall-windows-xp-home-onto-asus-ee-pc-900/180718.html