Tom's Guide | Tom's Hardware | Tom's Games
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
I have a system running win me and red hat 7.0, i would like to try windows xp (the $10 download) without doing a fresh install over my existing windows me drive. i have have a 30 gig hard drive with with 6 partitions, (ME, linux, linux swap, win swap, and two for storage) i'd like to install xp on one of the storage drives, i use lilo to boot linux and xp, if someone could steer in in the right direction on the best way to do this. also would i be able to get to my existing windows me files and apps through xp. and other info would be greatly appreciated...

This might be of some use:
NEWSGROUP: microsoft.public.whistler.professional.general
made triple boot with win98, win2k, whistler
Saturday, April 28, 2001 12:07 PMI made a triple boot as follows:
format the whole drive
First partition, which is C:\ and
primary, FAT32 with win98, during install I renamed WINDOWS -> WIN98.
From win98, I started the win2000 installation onto the same partition, i.e.
also C.\ into WINNT (which is default), then I created 2 more primary
partions D and E with NTFS 5.0 of win2k. After the installation of win2000
completed, I started the installation of whistler from win2000. Since I
always mark the option "let me choose the installation partition", during
the installation process, I create the fourth partition, now under control
of whistler, thus NTFS 5.1. and extended primary and named F:\, systemroot
for whistler is F:\WINDOWS.Both %systemroots% C:\WIN98 and C:\WINNT co-exist without any trouble on the
same partition formatted with FAT32. On the other hand systemroot for
whistler should reside on its own partition, F:\ in my case, since win2k is
designed with NTSF5.0 (FAT32 is OK too) and whistler with NTFS5.1. In this
triple boot the file BOOT.INI resides also (as a hidden file) in C:\. Have
read about many cases where they can't boot anymore because NTLDR was not
found - in many cases the file boot.ini got changed.. With WIN98 left on C:\
(it takes only about 280MB to keep it there even if you never load win98) it
is easy to access C and edit boot.ini and get going again without any loss
of data - even for those not familiar with recovery conosle.boot.ini gets messed up if you install win98 after win2k, also installing
win2k after whistler if your partition organization is unfortunate. So the
correct sequence should always be: win98 first on first primary as FAT32,
win2000 second, also on first primary (FAT32) or second primary as NTFS5.0,
and whistler LAST on its own NTFS5.1 partition. Installing win2k once
whistler is installed, you end up with corrupt files in the whistler system
root.This approach keeps everything quite clean.
It is really a drawback that we cannot start VS.NET from whister, OK, 2
betas should not be mixed, but I have not found one single application that
runs under win2k but fails under whistler - I guess MS locked it until beta
2.Sven

![]() |
![]() |
![]() |

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.
| Ads by Google |