Computing.Net > Forums > Windows XP > SP2 - Microsoft Cover-up?

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

SP2 - Microsoft Cover-up?

Reply to Message Icon

Name: XpUser
Date: August 18, 2004 at 05:52:57 Pacific
OS: XP Home & XP Pro (Both Sp
CPU/Ram: Rig 1: 2.02GHz/512RAM R
Comment:

In the beginning,

1. Microsoft pleaded with us to turn on Windows Update.

2. Microsoft uploaded a link for anyone to order SP2 CD, only to take it down hours later.

Then came IBM decision to not implement SP2.

Now Microsoft is offering us a way to Temporarily Disable Delivery of Windows XP SP2 through Windows Update and Automatic Updates

I wonder what's really going on with Microsoft in Redmond?

i_XpUser



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: DocMemory
Date: August 18, 2004 at 06:08:40 Pacific
Reply:

I understood that the temporary disable method was aimed at people/businesses running networks that didn't want to distribute SP2 to everybody on the network without testing it in their SOE. It only delays the update for 120 days from August 16.
Also imagine 50 or more computers starting to download SP2 at the same time over the same internet connection. I would hope larger orgs would be using SUS server though.
Having said that I wonder if even Microsoft knows whats going on in Microsoft.

"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one less travelled by, And that has made all the difference." Frost


0

Response Number 2
Name: XpUser
Date: August 18, 2004 at 06:55:06 Pacific
Reply:

It only delays the update for 120 days from August 16.

Why the 120 days from August 16? What's Microsoft thinking? Will your XP implode if you don't bother applying SP2?


i_XpUser


0

Response Number 3
Name: mikeo
Date: August 18, 2004 at 07:08:41 Pacific
Reply:

It is one thing to possible disrupt a home user's computer after installing SP2, but altogether different, if it were to bring down a large company network. $$$$$$$$

With SP2 issues still remain.


0

Response Number 4
Name: DataAnvil
Date: August 18, 2004 at 07:24:01 Pacific
Reply:

DocMemory and mikeo both make good points.

As far as: Then came IBM decision to not implement SP2.

That's not relevant in any case, since MS has no control over decisions made by IBM.


0

Response Number 5
Name: borderrose
Date: August 18, 2004 at 10:40:56 Pacific
Reply:

Docmemory hit it on the head. No business of any size will apply anything as mission critical as major upgrades to the PC operating system platform without a full acceptance test.

Borderrose


0

Related Posts

See More



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows XP Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: SP2 - Microsoft Cover-up?

SP2 and Microsoft - Huh? www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/sp2-and-microsoft-huh/105749.html

Taskbar Icon Problem www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/taskbar-icon-problem/116006.html

SP2 causing problems www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/sp2-causing-problems/129549.html