Computing.Net > Forums > Windows XP > sate speeds 1.5gb vs 3gb

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

sate speeds 1.5gb vs 3gb

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Greensystemsgo
Date: August 2, 2008 at 21:52:46 Pacific
OS: x64 vista ultimate
CPU/Ram: Q6600, 4gb
Product: ME
Comment:

So im sure this is a dumb question, but i have two seperate HD's, one is a 160gb that i use as the primary drive with vista on it that is operating at 1.5gb/s and the second is a 500gb that operates at 3gb/s that functions as a storage device with no prorgrams installed to it. first off hwo does windows tell which is drive is master/slave? is that not around anymore with sata? secondly can i have both drives at 3gb/s? they can both operate at that and they are they are by the same maker, and are in the same series.


Beast Desktop
Intel Q6600 G0 @ 2.4ghz
Evga 680i
Evga 8800GTS 640mb/320bit
4096mb corsair
1x 160gb | 1x 500gb
750w corsair psu



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: RTAdams89
Date: August 2, 2008 at 22:40:47 Pacific
Reply:

No master slave. Each drive has it's own channel with SATA.

If both drives are 3.0GB/s capable, and both are connected to a motherboard or card that supports 3.0GB/s, both should automatically operate at that speed. What leads you to believe one isn't?

-Ryan Adams
Computer Tips, Guides, Downloads, and more:http://RyanTAdams.com


0

Response Number 2
Name: jam
Date: August 2, 2008 at 23:07:40 Pacific
Reply:

There's little appreciable performance difference between SATA 150 & SATA 300. And just for clarification, it's 1.5Gbits/sec (150MB/s) & 3.0Gbits/sec (300MB/s).

There is no master/slave for SATA devices...there can be only one device per channel.


0

Response Number 3
Name: Greensystemsgo
Date: August 2, 2008 at 23:31:21 Pacific
Reply:

Wow thankyou for such a quick reply.

i believe the 160gb is only operating in 1.5Gbits/sec because theirs a jumper like the old IDE drives, and on the drive has a little blurb saying that if the jumpers their its only gonna operate in 1.5Gbits/sec, not 3Gbits/sec. The 500gb has a spot for the jumper, and also has the same blurb, however their is not one present.


Beast Desktop
Intel Q6600 G0 @ 2.4ghz
Evga 680i
Evga 8800GTS 640mb/320bit
4096mb corsair
1x 160gb | 1x 500gb
750w corsair psu


0

Response Number 4
Name: lurkswithin
Date: August 3, 2008 at 00:49:24 Pacific
Reply:

Remove the limiting jumper! But you will not see any remarkable difference...unless you are copying some large files from or to the drive. Then it shows it copied a tad bit faster.
The jumper was installed to cover older motherboards using SATA I... the 3.0gbs setting is for newer boards using the SATA II protocol. If you have the older SATA I board it is backward compatable and will only run with the 1.5 interface.

In The Matters Of Style,
swim with the current;
in matters of principle,
Stand Like A Rock


"People demand freedom of speech to make up for the
freedom of thought which they avoid."


0

Response Number 5
Name: aegis
Date: August 3, 2008 at 08:40:58 Pacific
Reply:

The 1.5 and 3.0gb is the maximum theoretical 'interface' speed. That has nothing to do with the hard drive speed. Drives these days have a problem even reachng 1.0 gb throughput speed.


0

Related Posts

See More



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows XP Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: sate speeds 1.5gb vs 3gb

1.5GB memory optimization for WinXP www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/15gb-memory-optimization-for-winxp/145406.html

1 Gb RAM and large virtual memory www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/1-gb-ram-and-large-virtual-memory/129957.html

Limited RAM www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/limited-ram/126095.html