Computing.Net > Forums > Windows XP > OT: new CN format

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

OT: new CN format

Reply to Message Icon

Name: jam
Date: September 1, 2008 at 19:55:44 Pacific
OS: n/a
CPU/Ram: n/a
Product: n/a
Comment:

Is it just me or does the new site format run considerably slower than the old format? I've given it some time to see if things improve but it seems to be getting worse. I know the change is here to stay but can something be done to get these pages to load faster? Especially when clicking on "confirm post"?

On a side note, it's a shame to see that we've lost several of our most knowledgeable forum regulars due to the format change. So far, I haven't seen anyone stepping up to fill the void. In fact, many of the answers supplied by the newb "helpers" are flat out incorrect.

Change isn't always good.

"If my answers frighten you then you should cease asking scary questions" - Jules Winnfield (Samuel L. Jackson) in Pulp Fiction



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: Tubesandwires
Date: September 1, 2008 at 20:32:34 Pacific
Reply:

I am seeing the same thing, whether I am using my 98SE 450 K6-III, or my XP 2.15ghz computer.
This site loads pages slower on my computers than any other site I know of, other than maybe the Asus sites, and the Taiwan Epox site.
When the new look was first loaded it didn't seem too bad, but it has gotten much worse since.
You might recall I noted freezes in 98SE when loading pages on this site a while back well before the change. It got better after that, but now with the new look, it's worse in 98SE now, despite the fact I've changed to a fairly fresh install of it.

In 98SE, if I don't use FlashSwitch to toggle the Adobe flash off, clicking on a thread with a lot of posts can freeze the display for as long as a minute, or more - same thing when I edit a post in such a thread and then go back to it.
I can see if one has a computer even slower than my 450mhz K6-III, that may be too much to tolerate for some people, especially when flash is enabled.

If I toggle Adobe flash off with FlashSwitch, the freeze is about 5 seconds for a new thread, up to about 30 seconds for a thread with a lot of posts, but on average about 15 seconds.

On the 2.15ghz XP computer, the freeze is much shorter, but it is longer than before.


0

Response Number 2
Name: Justin Weber
Date: September 1, 2008 at 21:27:46 Pacific
Reply:

Hi,

I don't disagree that the site might be a bit slower with the new design. However, what doesn't make sense to me is that you seem to have the issue more in a more pronounced fashion when you click "confirm post." Of all the things the new design changed, that isn't really one of them. Has anyone else noticed a slowdown when confirming post?

BTW, the fact the site is slow might have nothing to do with the new design. Traffic to the site is way up in the past month or two. That might be causing the latency (although I've gotta admit, I haven't seen much, especially that confirm post thing you mention).

Justin


0

Response Number 3
Name: Tubesandwires
Date: September 1, 2008 at 21:45:45 Pacific
Reply:

Usually I get at most a short delay when I click Confirm post, but occaisionally I have gotten a delay of a minute or so, and a few times it froze for so long I thought I had a connection problem, but when it eventually unfroze, the post was there in the thread.


0

Response Number 4
Name: aegis
Date: September 1, 2008 at 21:53:51 Pacific
Reply:

I haven't noticed any significant difference. Screens come up in a couple of seconds for me.


0

Response Number 5
Name: itguru
Date: September 1, 2008 at 22:33:12 Pacific
Reply:

Thhe only difference is when there is a long long thread 10+ replies and it can take 30 seconds or more to fully scroll to bottom of page on first opening.

Yes would agree that the site is OK, I have no issues with changed layout, but it is slower to load.


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: lurkswithin
Date: September 1, 2008 at 22:33:33 Pacific
Reply:

Justin,

I too, have had the freeze up when I 'confirm post' as with what tubes and wires was speaking it takes longer to load with threads of 5 or more posts than what it otherwisw did.

I also have not been able to turn off the add server crap. It is impossible to copy and paste becauseof it! Clicking the '?' and following the directions does nothing but refreshes the page.

Definition of a Liberal:
He has never had to fight for his Freedom
He is only good at enjoying it!

"IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM


0

Response Number 7
Name: btk1w1
Date: September 2, 2008 at 00:56:58 Pacific
Reply:

Slower here too... by lengths

The new setup was faster after the transition... but....

I used to prefer to open multiple tabs at a time and by the time I read one the rest have loaded. Nowadays I can open multiple tabs, read one, close it and wait for the next to load, then the next etc.

I open one at a time now or multiple if I need to make a coffee.

I was shaped by my ip for excess usage and thought it was due to this (it largely was), but when my speed picked up again it didn't improve the site navigation satisfaction by much.

For this, my visits here are becoming less frequent.


0

Response Number 8
Name: Mechanix2Go
Date: September 2, 2008 at 01:32:07 Pacific
Reply:

Everything here is kinda slow. LOL

My discomfort is the color scheme. Mostly light blue and white. A sad end for a site that used to be WAY better looking the the average.

I'm already pretty tired of pressing ctrl-a on every page so I can see what's there.


=====================================
If at first you don't succeed, you're about average.

M2


0

Response Number 9
Name: btk1w1
Date: September 2, 2008 at 02:29:52 Pacific
Reply:

Justin,

I know this sounds wildly crazy.... but.... how about loyal members with an X amount of posts get the option of classic view minus ads?


0

Response Number 10
Name: Justin Weber
Date: September 2, 2008 at 06:02:42 Pacific
Reply:

Hey,

The delay with longer thread is to be expected. Also, that happened before the switchover. I might be able to do something about that. I'll give it a try.

As for the confirm post delay, how often does that occur? Like most of the time, or randomly ever once in a while.

Justin


0

Response Number 11
Name: Justin Weber
Date: September 2, 2008 at 06:19:22 Pacific
Reply:

Wait a minute,

Who here that reported a slowness problem is using IE?

Justin


0

Response Number 12
Name: Chuck 2
Date: September 2, 2008 at 06:22:07 Pacific
Reply:

I have Dialup.
As for myself, when I get to the 'Confirm Post' page, I want to click the button to get to the next page. Seems to me that the delay in leaving
the confirm post page is that that page seems to
want to continue loading before departure to the next page.

Have done nothing, but all seems faster this morning. ???

EDIT -- OOPS, not for posting this.


0

Response Number 13
Name: Justin Weber
Date: September 2, 2008 at 06:48:52 Pacific
Reply:

Hey,

I did make some changes that predominately affect IE users. I always have used Firefox, so I didn't notice any slowdown. However, IE did seem to be very slow.

Justin


0

Response Number 14
Name: Tubesandwires
Date: September 2, 2008 at 08:10:38 Pacific
Reply:

I'm using IE 6.x on both the 98SE and XP computers.

lurkswitihin

If you're using IE, try using FlashSwitch to toggle Adobe flash off while you are on this site - it disables some of the ads from displaying.


0

Response Number 15
Name:
Date: September 2, 2008 at 08:34:47 Pacific
Reply:

Guys,

I've been browsing around. I think what I did this morning should really speed it up in IE.

Justin


0

Response Number 16
Name: Dumbob
Date: September 2, 2008 at 09:25:33 Pacific
Reply:

I'm seeing severe slowdown generally on the Web, worse on CN with Internet Explorer errors only on CN.

Loading Forum pages is painfully slow, Threads even slower, (this is where the error messages come in) More frequent errors On Hardware vs XP. More errors on XP than Win95/98.

Running Celeron 500Mhz, 256mb, IE6 SP1, Win98SE.

The IE error message is STRANGE. After waiting for a long thread to load and immediately after the mouse begins to respond to scroll down the page, I get IE Error Popup that freezes the page till I click OK.

"Internet Explorer Cannot Open the Page //www.computing.netxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
The Operation will Terminate"

I immediately get the typical Page Not Found error screen. Clicking on the Back button returns me to the page that was not Found, which is fully functional. NOT consisent.

I've seen the same slowness on Confirm Post, today being Worse.

At first I liked the new Format, now I find myself wishing for the old. Eye strain often convinces me to do something else. I,ve turned down the contrast and brightness on my Monitor but ssometimes I just have to change Sites or walk away for a while.

There is nothing to learn from someone who already agrees with you.


0

Response Number 17
Name: Tubesandwires
Date: September 2, 2008 at 11:31:33 Pacific
Reply:

One thing I would like to mention is if you're impatient and click to scroll down too soon on this site, before the the page is ready to do it, it takes even longer before you are able to scroll, especially if you do it more than once before it is ready to scroll.

Clues as to when it is ready to scroll
- if there is any animation in an ad you can see, wait until you see movement in it
- start up notepad, minimize the notepad window, click on the thread here you want to load, restore the notepad window, close it - the notepad window will not disappear until the page is ready to scroll.

Dumbob

More clues as to when a page here is ready to scroll, for slower computers..
- if there is an ad url at the bottom of your screen in the toolbar, wait till that goes away, plus 5 seconds or more
- if there is a bar in the toobar indicating the page has not fully loaded, wait till that goes away, plus 5 seconds or more

The computer I use most is 98SE K6-III 450 128mb, Radeon 7000 AGP video card in 2X mode; I usually use IE 6.x

Sysoft Sandra rates it's performance as equivalent to ~520mhz because of it's L2 on the cpu and the onboard L2 being used as L3.
I've tried 256mb but it doesn't seem to make any significant difference for this site or what I do in general.

"I'm seeing severe slowdown generally on the Web..."

Same here, on some sites, especially in the past few months.
Windows default TCP settings are not ideal. If you haven't already tweaked your TCP settings, improving them makes a noticable difference with slower computers - try TCPOptimizer here:
http://www.speedguide.net/downloads...
It only needs to be run once, until the next time you run Windows Setup, and it doesn't load anything resident.

Since you are using IE, try getting and installing FlashSwitch - if you toggle Adobe flash off with it when on this site, the freezes are much shorter.

Once you have flash disabled, try waiting 15 seconds before clicking to scroll on a new or shorter thread. For a longer thread, wait at least 30 seconds.

In general, there are many sites you can still navigate in with flash switched off, despite error messages about you not having it or your version is too old.
E.g. the Asus web sites display multiple popup windows one after the other if flash is switched off when you want to load a page, but you just Cancel or close them and can still navigate fine.

If you edit a post of yours that is in a longer thread, if you don't need to go back to the thread, click on Computing.Net instead of going back to the thread, to avoid having to wait for the longer thread to load.

I think your errors are unique to your situation.
I was getting occaisional "Internet Explorer needs to close" or similar errors on my old 98SE installation, but I'm not getting those now on a fairly fresh install of 98SE on the same computer, on another physical drive.

"Eye strain often convinces me to do something else."

What resolution are you using? I'm using 800 x 600 and that's not too bad.


0

Response Number 18
Name: Tubesandwires
Date: September 2, 2008 at 12:52:38 Pacific
Reply:

Justin
Whatever you did seems to have improved the situation in IE.
Thanks.


0

Response Number 19
Name: jefro
Date: September 2, 2008 at 13:53:15 Pacific
Reply:

Seems to be a script issue, maybe a link issue?

"Best Practices", Event viewer, host file, perfmon, antivirus, anti-spyware, Live CD's, backups, are in my top 10


0

Response Number 20
Name: Mary
Date: September 2, 2008 at 18:06:58 Pacific
Reply:

I came on here tonight to look at posts and it's so slow on my new computer but other sites are loading fast for me. I was wondering if it was my end or what. Mary


0

Response Number 21
Name: OtheHill
Date: September 2, 2008 at 18:29:20 Pacific
Reply:

It is 9:25 Eastern Daylight Time here and right now the site is running like dialup.


0

Response Number 22
Name: lurkswithin
Date: September 2, 2008 at 20:57:06 Pacific
Reply:

Tubesandwires,

Thanks, I will try the flashswitch....I hate issues with flash because I play online speedchess and the flash is needed to play. If it acts up even the tiniest bit I lose on time default...

Definition of a Liberal:
He has never had to fight for his Freedom
He is only good at enjoying it!

"IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM


0

Response Number 23
Name: lurkswithin
Date: September 2, 2008 at 20:58:57 Pacific
Reply:

well, excuse me.....spoke too soon! Justin must have fixed the add server...I got no adds now!

Thanks Justin, Much Better!

The loading is much faster as well...even on large post threads. I was really getting upset over that as I clock my dowmloads @ 14529 kbps. Closer to 15500 late nights!

Definition of a Liberal:
He has never had to fight for his Freedom
He is only good at enjoying it!

"IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM


0

Response Number 24
Name: Tubesandwires
Date: September 2, 2008 at 22:00:21 Pacific
Reply:

"I clock my dowmloads @ 14529 kbps. Closer to 15500 late nights!"

Where are you getting those figures from? I think you're looking in the wrong place.
.....

Another clue as to when a page here is ready to scroll
- better still - click on the thread here you want to load, then start up notepad - the notepad window will not appear until the page is ready to scroll.

Most of the time pages are now loading a lot faster - faster than they were before the new look
(when I have flash toggled off with FlashSwitch, even before the ads disappered)


0

Response Number 25
Name: lurkswithin
Date: September 3, 2008 at 02:36:30 Pacific
Reply:

I have a great ISP. Their basic offer was for 5,000kbps but they raised it to 8,000kbps. I have a higher tier and they raised me to 12,000kbps but I get a lot better than that.

I use a server from 300 miles away using speakeasy speed test>

Last Result:
Download Speed: 14795 kbps (1849.4 KB/sec transfer rate)
Upload Speed: 551 kbps (68.9 KB/sec transfer rate)

Upload is a tad slower than i would like to have but it is sufficient

http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest/

This is from a server 2,000 miles away:
Last Result:
Download Speed: 10026 kbps (1253.3 KB/sec transfer rate)
Upload Speed: 557 kbps (69.6 KB/sec transfer rate)

Definition of a Liberal:
He has never had to fight for his Freedom
He is only good at enjoying it!

"IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM


0

Response Number 26
Name: lurkswithin
Date: September 3, 2008 at 02:44:11 Pacific
Reply:

Justin,

What the heck....the adds seem to be turned off on this page but when I go to another thread they pop back up!

Definition of a Liberal:
He has never had to fight for his Freedom
He is only good at enjoying it!

"IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM


0

Response Number 27
Name: Justin Weber
Date: September 3, 2008 at 05:55:36 Pacific
Reply:

Hey,

I never took down any ads. I'm not sure why they weren't showing up for you before.

Thanks,
Justin


0

Response Number 28
Name: Tubesandwires
Date: September 3, 2008 at 08:28:02 Pacific
Reply:

Justin
When I made response 24, there was merely a blank box at the top of the page where an ad norally is, a red X in it top left. That's with FlashSwitch toggling flash off, but there is normally always an ad there in any case.

lurkswithin

Apparently you do have an excellent ISP.

I use an internet package rated at 1,500kbps max.
When I went to that speakeasy speed test site just now, chose a server in Washington (I'm in Alberta, Canada) the results I get are
1292kpbs download and 259kbps upload.
161kb/sec, 32.4kb/sec


0

Response Number 29
Name: Justin Weber
Date: September 3, 2008 at 10:13:54 Pacific
Reply:

Hey,

We're still working on this issue. I've done some things that should speed up the site, but certainly everything that can be done hasn't been done yet. It will be though.

Thanks,
Justin


0

Response Number 30
Name: Dumbob
Date: September 3, 2008 at 10:19:36 Pacific
Reply:

Tubesandwires,

You were correct, the error messages were related to a .SWP file that was not working. Had it set to Let Windows Manage, but the Swap file was empty 0 Files. I opened Everest Home to find Memory usage at 92% (of 256mb) Swap file usage (0),Idling on CN Hardware Forum. Hdd has 5.46GB free, ????

Only way I could get Swap file to work was set it's size as 800mb. Wish I'd have found this before Justin made changes that affect IE. Not sure how much effect either one had. guess it really doesn't matter why, but the errors are gone and the site runs much faster.

Also found that Avast Free consumes about 40% of available Ram. Damn, everybody wants to use more RAM, but I'm maxxed out at 256mb. Gotta put avast on a diet.

What ever happened to the old (really old) RAM adapters that allowed 2 simms in one Slot.

Haven't tried the TCP Optimizer yet, thanks for the link though. Got it downloaded.

Justin,

Thanks for whatever you did with IE. Everythig working better today, even Submit Follow up.

jam,

Thanks for bringing this up, I thought It was all my machine. Saved me from having to shop for a new system right now when $$$ are scarce.

There is nothing to learn from someone who already agrees with you.


0

Response Number 31
Name: Tubesandwires
Date: September 3, 2008 at 21:32:42 Pacific
Reply:

Dumbob

In my experience you won't see any difference in performance on a 500mhz computer in 98SE even if you could add more ram than you already have. In fact 128mb is fine, or a bit more if you have onboard video (say, 32 or 64 mb). I found through testing with Sysoft Sandra the minumun you need to use for 98SE to have Windows work as it should is 96mb - any less than that will not allow your hard drive to achieve it's full maximum speed.

"What ever happened to the old (really old) RAM adapters that allowed 2 simms in one Slot."

They pretty much disappeared within a few years after DIMMs first came out, by the mid 90's.
Do you have 72 "pin" SIMMS on this mboard?
If you do...
- you would need two adapters, not one, and two more SIMMs of the same size.

I have one on which you can install 4 30 "pin" simms of the same size into a 72 "pin" slot.
I have never seen or heard of one for DIMMs (168 "pin").

That's an odd swap file problem. Maybe Windows "thinks" the amount of free space is too small when it's set to automatic?

5.46gb out of how many?
What size is the partition Windows is on?

I have my older 98SE installation on a ~8gb partition, and it's swap file is on another entire 500mb partition by itself on the same hard drive. When there is less than about 800mb freespace left on the partition Windows is on, Windows (98SE) begins to start to run slower.

I used to have the swap file set to use an entire 200mb parition on the same drive and that works okay too, but I found when I have a lot of .jpg files images from a digital camera open at the same time, that wasn't enough.

I'm still using AVG 7.5 for 98SE - they haven't stopped supporting it as of yet.
I installed Avast on someone else's 98SE computer, 400mhz I believe. It didn't seem to hog the cpu like you're saying. You might have something else going on. Try disabling Avast if you can and see what the load is then.


0

Response Number 32
Name: btk1w1
Date: September 12, 2008 at 16:34:48 Pacific
Reply:

Well I finally gave in and done something about the very sluggish performance with computing.net and IE.

I have now downloaded Opera browser and modified my preferences so it now opens pages immediately without all the flashy ads.

"Tools" > "Preferences" > "Advanced" tab > "Content" option on left.

Unchecked the following:

* Enable animated images
* Enable sound ion web pages
* Enable JavaScript
* Enable Java
* Enable Plug-Ins

It's a real shame that I now have a dedicated browser to visit only one site.


0

Response Number 33
Name: Tubesandwires
Date: September 13, 2008 at 07:18:43 Pacific
Reply:

btk1w1

I get quite a bit of improvement by simply using FlashSwitch to toggle off Adobe flash in IE when on this site, rather than having to cripple all those things.
....

The improvements seen for a few days earlier due to changes made by Justin are no longer as evident. The delays for me since in IE 6.x in Win 98SE on my 450mhz K6-III have been less than they were before Justin made the changes, but more than during the first few days after he made the changes.


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows XP Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: OT: new CN format

Format my C: Drive www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/format-my-c-drive/27669.html

formating problem www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/formating-problem/116548.html

How to format my c drive?????? www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/how-to-format-my-c-drive/44058.html