Computing.Net > Forums > Windows XP > NTFS vs FAT32 (XP)

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

NTFS vs FAT32 (XP)

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Lord_of_Fear
Date: November 2, 2001 at 15:04:15 Pacific
Comment:

Can someone resume a little the differences of both NTFS and FAT32? Programs and games are affected with one or another? Thanks!



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: Brian
Date: November 2, 2001 at 17:46:07 Pacific
Reply:

Easy!

NTFS - Good performance / Great Security
FAT32 - Great performance / No Security

FAT32 - Unable to see files on NTFS
NTFS - Able to see everything

Suggestion: Go with NTFS. You can always copy files from NTFS to FAT32 if you need to access them with Win95/98/ME

Soound good? Thought so!

Regards,

Brian


0

Response Number 2
Name: sunny
Date: November 2, 2001 at 18:40:08 Pacific
Reply:

if you like to play games that are somewaht old i would recommend that you go with fat32.. though ntfs is better, but you wouldn't be able to play some games in it..


0

Response Number 3
Name: jim
Date: November 3, 2001 at 02:31:09 Pacific
Reply:

I found NTFS to be more stable.


0

Response Number 4
Name: Dave Rajaratnam
Date: November 3, 2001 at 02:37:37 Pacific
Reply:

Hi LOF,
If you launch yourself into NTFS you wont be able to reverse back to FAT32. So what have you decided now? Witty


0

Response Number 5
Name: lzbear
Date: January 5, 2002 at 19:32:04 Pacific
Reply:

Well I switch over to NTFS, then ran a tune up @ http://www.pcpitstop.com/default.asp.

Unusually low disk performance...............

Drive C has a cached speed of 125.28 megabytes per second.

Drive C has an uncached speed of 1.22 megabytes per second.

For comparison, systems with the same CPU, clock speed, and memory size as this one have an average cached speed of 243.17 MB/s and an uncached speed of 3.48 MB/s .

Solutions:

One or more partitions are using the NTFS file system. Although this file system offers many good features such as encryption and improved security, it is generally much slower than the FAT32 file system. You may notice a significant performance difference between FAT32 and NTFS partitions on the same drive. Our tests compare your drives with the results of ALL other PC Pitstop visitors with the same CPU type and speed, regardless of file system type. Since the majority of our visitors have the FAT32 file system, most NTFS drives will appear slow by comparison.

Looks like I screwed up. Have to reformat everything to get back FAT32. They said it was a little slower but it seems to me it's alot slower than FAT32.

LZBEAR


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: DK Nørden
Date: January 10, 2002 at 03:04:30 Pacific
Reply:

Ntfs is slower than fat 32 then you just have formatted your HD
Fat32 will get slower throug time because
it shall handle more and more files.
Ntfs do not.... ok maby a little but nothing you will notice :)


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows XP Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: NTFS vs FAT32 (XP)

NTFS vs. FAT32 www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/ntfs-vs-fat32/885.html

NTFS vs Fat32 www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/ntfs-vs-fat32/80244.html

NTFS vs FAT32 www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/ntfs-vs-fat32/80592.html