Computing.Net > Forums > Windows XP > NTFS or FAT 32??

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

NTFS or FAT 32??

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Gilbert
Date: November 9, 2001 at 20:15:44 Pacific
Comment:

I understand that during the installation of Windows XP you have a choice of using NTFS or FAT 32. Is there an advantage or disadvantage as to which one to use.



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: NTFS
Date: November 9, 2001 at 20:52:39 Pacific
Reply:

Its really all a matter of preference
NTFS- More Stable
- More Security Features
- files take up less Space

Fat32- Faster (Some say)



0

Response Number 2
Name: jw
Date: November 9, 2001 at 21:07:05 Pacific
Reply:

fat32 is compatible with win9x
ntfs isn't
and once you go to ntfs, you would need delpart.exe to go back to fat32
and then fdisking and formating,
from http://www.winsupersite.com/FAQ/whistler.asp

Q. So which file system should I use?
A. You should always use NTFS in Windows XP unless you are going to dual-boot a system with Windows 9x/Me and XP and wish to access your XP partition from the old 9x-based OS. Remember that Windows 9x/Me cannot access NTFS file systems. However... You can access NTFS partitions over a network.

Q. I've heard that you can convert drives to NTFS when upgrading, but if I do this, can I still uninstall XP and return to my previous Windows 9x/Me version?
A. No. If you think you're going to want to uninstall XP, do not allow it to convert your drives during Setup. Instead, wait a few weeks and ensure that XP works on your system first, and then run the convert.exe command line tool to convert any FAT or FAT32 drives to NTFS, on the fly, without destroying any of your data.

so it depends on what you want to do,
if you want to just run xp ntfs is the way to go,for added security etc.
from techtv;
NTFS and FAT32 are file systems used by Microsoft. NTFS is more robust and secure than FAT32.


If all you want to do is install XP, go with NTFS.


If you want to make the computer a multi-boot system, you might want to consider FAT32, but you don't have to go with it.


If you're concerned about being able to see files across partitions, you should make the shared partitions FAT32.


0

Response Number 3
Name: Gregor
Date: November 9, 2001 at 21:53:07 Pacific
Reply:

I have sort of a related question/comment about the NTFS/FAT 32 system.

When I upgraded to XP, the installation software gave me a few choices to use NTFS, FAT 32, or leave as-is. I chose NTFS during the installation. Once XP was all installed and running however, I find the OS is reporting the disc as a FAT 32. Why would this be? I KNOW for a FACT that I did indeed choose NTFS when I installed WinXP so, why would the disc be reported as a FAT32?

Anyone???


0

Response Number 4
Name: vidna
Date: November 10, 2001 at 04:09:45 Pacific
Reply:

fat32 IS faster but the file structure will degrade over a relatively short time and you will just have to reformat...

so if u want best performance for games or whatever go for fat32, but for ease and security i go for NTFS

i rest my case your honour


0

Response Number 5
Name: JFK
Date: November 10, 2001 at 04:52:41 Pacific
Reply:

I hear all these persons choosing for NTFS, but I went for FAT32, for the very simle reason that IF XP gets f---ed up, I still can access my pc with a DOS-bootup-disk (made on another PC). I've seen it by a friend of mine who also choose NTFS, and messed his PC up; he couldn't access his pc anymore. And besides that, FAT32 doesn't give any problems at all, not as far as I've seen that is....


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: phil
Date: November 10, 2001 at 06:49:37 Pacific
Reply:

Hi
If your using Pro with the backup feature you will need to have NTFS to use the shadow copying feature, it will need this if your backing-up system files that are in use e.g. the system partition is being backed up.

If you convert to NTFS at a later stage using the 'convert' feature, you may end up with smaller cluster sizes - though I think this may have been addressed in XP.

If your just running XP go to NTFS, the OS was designed to use this over FAT32.

Phil


0

Response Number 7
Name: Joseph Marinan
Date: November 10, 2001 at 09:07:15 Pacific
Reply:

M$ cautions that XP will not format more than 32Gs at FAT 32, which might be a problem for those with large drives. (Say if trying a "clean" {New} install.)

Most 3rd party writers recommend staying with FAT 32, and you can always convert later.


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows XP Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: NTFS or FAT 32??

NTFS Vs. FAT 32 www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/ntfs-vs-fat-32/52043.html

FAT 32 or NTFS www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/fat-32-or-ntfs/64237.html

HDD NTFS to FATS 32? Can Do? www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/hdd-ntfs-to-fats-32-can-do/36610.html