Computing.Net > Forums > Windows XP > How do I get back at virus spammer?

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

How do I get back at virus spammer?

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Steve Hopper
Date: February 24, 2006 at 14:26:43 Pacific
OS: XP Home SP2
CPU/Ram: 1.6Ghz with 512Mb RAM
Product: Chr'ony
Comment:

Here's the complete message header, etc. which this e-mail's attachement contained a W32.Beagle.DN@mm virus (sent to me)...

=========================

X-Symantec-TimeoutProtection: 0
X-Symantec-TimeoutProtection: 1
X-Symantec-TimeoutProtection: 2
X-Symantec-TimeoutProtection: 3
X-Symantec-TimeoutProtection: 4
X-Symantec-TimeoutProtection: 5
X-Symantec-TimeoutProtection: 6
X-Symantec-TimeoutProtection: 7
X-Symantec-TimeoutProtection: 8
X-Symantec-TimeoutProtection: 9
X-Symantec-TimeoutProtection: 10
X-YPOPs-Folder: @B@Bulk
X-RocketYMUMID: AGomvs4AAFLcQ/7grw27sl9bWuc
X-Apparently-To: 'me'@'XXX'.com via 206.190.38.106; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 02:32:15 -0800
X-Rocket-Spam: 202.163.199.197
X-YahooFilteredBulk: 202.163.199.197
X-Originating-IP: [202.163.199.197]
Return-Path: <chelo_rayo@yahoo.com>
Authentication-Results: mta106.mail.mud.yahoo.com
from=yahoo.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
Received: from 202.163.199.197 (HELO lizette7.com) (202.163.199.197)
by mta106.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 02:32:15 -0800
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:32:07 +0800
To: 'me'<'me'@'xxx'.com>
From: "Chelo" <chelo_rayo@yahoo.com>
Subject: Gwd: Hello :-)
Message-ID: <wlqnsskfbptumvwwech@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="--------ehdxsbdytgeujmdaxscj"
Content-Length: 17134
X-NAS-Language: English
X-NAS-Bayes: #0: 2.09228E-071; #1: 1
X-NAS-Classification: 0
X-NAS-MessageID: 6327
X-NAS-Validation: {4FFF9F5B-0862-47C2-858F-'xxxxxxxxxx'}

----------ehdxsbdytgeujmdaxscj
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<html><body>
Ok. Please, have a look at the attached file.



</body></html>

----------ehdxsbdytgeujmdaxscj
Content-Type: plain/text;
name="Norton AntiVirus Deleted-1.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Norton AntiVirus Deleted-1.txt"

Tm9ydG9uIEFudGlWaXJ1cyByZW1vdmVkIHRoZSBhdHRhY2htZW50OiB3d3cuY3Vtb25oZXJm
YWNlLnNjci4NClRoZSBXMzIuQmVhZ2xlLkROQG1tIHRocmVhdCB3YXMgZGV0ZWN0ZWQgaW4g
dGhlIGF0dGFjaG1lbnQu

----------ehdxsbdytgeujmdaxscj
Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="Description.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Description.txt"

eW91J3ZlIGdvdCB0aGVtIGFscmVhZHk=

----------ehdxsbdytgeujmdaxscj--


=========================

I submitted the IP address (202.163.199.197) to the WhoIs site (http://www.whatsmyip.org/whois/) by entering the IP address in the first dialog box and this's the resulting info that it came up with....

=========================

OrgName: Asia Pacific Network Information Centre
OrgID: APNIC
Address: PO Box 2131
City: Milton
StateProv: QLD
PostalCode: 4064
Country: AU

ReferralServer: whois://whois.apnic.net

NetRange: 202.0.0.0 - 203.255.255.255
CIDR: 202.0.0.0/7
NetName: APNIC-CIDR-BLK
NetHandle: NET-202-0-0-0-1
Parent:
NetType: Allocated to APNIC
NameServer: NS1.APNIC.NET
NameServer: NS3.APNIC.NET
NameServer: NS4.APNIC.NET
NameServer: TINNIE.ARIN.NET
NameServer: NS-SEC.RIPE.NET
NameServer: DNS1.TELSTRA.NET
Comment: This IP address range is not registered in the ARIN database.
Comment: For details, refer to the APNIC Whois Database via
Comment: WHOIS.APNIC.NET or http://www.apnic.net/apnic-bin/whois2.pl
Comment: ** IMPORTANT NOTE: APNIC is the Regional Internet Registry
Comment: for the Asia Pacific region. APNIC does not operate networks
Comment: using this IP address range and is not able to investigate
Comment: spam or abuse reports relating to these addresses. For more
Comment: help, refer to http://www.apnic.net/info/faq/abuse
Comment:
RegDate: 1994-04-05
Updated: 2005-05-20

OrgTechHandle: AWC12-ARIN
OrgTechName: APNIC Whois Contact
OrgTechPhone: +61 7 3858 3100
OrgTechEmail: search-apnic-not-arin@apnic.net

# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2006-02-23 19:10
# Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.
% [whois.apnic.net node-2]
% Whois data copyright terms http://www.apnic.net/db/dbcopyright.html

inetnum: 202.163.199.192 - 202.163.199.199
netname: RAINBOWCOMP1-PH
descr: Rainbow Computer II
descr: UP Shopping Mall Diliman QC
country: PH
admin-c: AA123-AP
tech-c: AA123-AP
mnt-by: MAINT-PH-INFOCOM
changed: framirez@info.com.ph 20010920
status: ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE
source: APNIC
changed: hm-changed@apnic.net 20020827

person: Alberto Alaman
address: Aurora Blvd Araneta
country: PH
phone: +63-2-714-2829
e-mail: alva@netasia.net
nic-hdl: AA123-AP
mnt-by: MAINT-PH-INFOCOM
changed: framirez@info.com.ph 20010919
source: APNIC

February 24, 2006, 4:24 pm

===========================

My question here is, would I be needing to send the e-mail I received (i.e.; a copy of the message header, etc., and/or forward the original e-mail) back to this
"Alberto Alaman" at "alva@netasia.net"? I suspect sending it might simply be telling the guy that I know it was him that sent the virus to me, but it seems I need to send him the "Please do not spam me" if it's only a legal effort in assuring that something might be done about any further e-mails this guy might plan on sending me, no?

===========================

I then submitted the IP address (202.163.199.197) to the WhoIs site (http://www.whatsmyip.org/whois/) by entering the IP address in right side dialog box ( that had a default entry of "IP Address") and this's the resulting info that it came up with....

adsl-199-197.info.com.ph

..apparrentl;y this is the domain name for the person's e-mail server? And as I'm uncertain which and/or if both searches revealed useful info in my quest to try and do whatever I can about this malicious person.

============================

I suspect that the "HELO lizette7.com" might be the e-mail server of the malicious person and I need to figure out if this's true or if not, who the server is so I can get the spammer's website shutdown, right?

Any expertise in getting this guy shut down and/or even prosecuted would be nice.

Thanks in advance for any help.

Regards and hap-e-trails, Steve Hopper



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: capt
Date: February 24, 2006 at 15:13:02 Pacific
Reply:

I doubt that the address you have is the one that the bad guy has. He has probably spoofed the address. Just sit back, relax and do not seek revenge and take care!


0

Response Number 2
Name: FJ
Date: February 24, 2006 at 15:20:46 Pacific
Reply:

Start using MailWasher Pro to screen your mail.

Looking for revenge is a waste of life. Finding revenge -- is life.

Lete him come to you. MailWasher will allow you to see who is sending what, without allowing the damage. Over time if he is kind enough to countinue to send you data, you will be able to nail him.


Tomorrow the Stars!


0

Response Number 3
Name: Steve Hopper
Date: February 24, 2006 at 16:47:14 Pacific
Reply:

Obviously the right person hasn't yet read this post. The two reasons being, there is enough info here to identify the computer and originating server, plus doing the right thing is not revenge, it is the right thing and that is to take the time and report the computer and notify the origiating server.

As WhoIs clearly shows the computer is in the Philippines, even his e-mail address is pretty assuredly alva@netasia.net, and the server is one or all of these: NS1.APNIC.NET, NS3.APNIC.NET, NS4.APNIC.NET, TINNIE.ARIN.NET, NS-SEC.RIPE.NET and DNS1.TELSTRA.NET.

As for the current replies, thanks but seeking to disuade me from acting responsibly and wishing me well at the same time, is not what's needed here.

This is a serious matter and is criminal behaviour requiring that whatever can be done, is done. This is not revenge.

Revenge would be if I were to go and find this person and do to him what might be done by a third world countryman.

This person's computer is traceable and so is the originating server, no?

I'm certain someone reading this post (who is knowledgible) will see that there's enough info to go beyond merely asking Yahoo to 'pretend' to take action on chelo_rayo@yahoo.com

Regards and hap-e-trails, Steve Hopper


0

Response Number 4
Name: capt
Date: February 24, 2006 at 17:00:47 Pacific
Reply:

Steve, just a question, since you are so knowledgeable, and have all the necessary information to take the appropriate action, why did you waste your time posting? Go ahead a do whatever you want. Please let us know the details of what to happens the individual when justice occurs. I suggest you take a look at what Steve Gibson had to do to track down the culprit in a denial of service attack that happened to him. Trust me, WHOIS was not how he solved the case. Just in case you do not know who Steve Gibson is, he is the president of Gibson Research. The website that provides us all with Shields Up, and other security support and help.


0

Response Number 5
Name: Derek
Date: February 24, 2006 at 17:35:34 Pacific
Reply:

Even if you manage it then the sender is likely to seek revenge on you too. He is probably clever enough to make a very good job of it and spam you to death.

The best thing to do is report it.

It's just a bit sickening when someone asks for help and then proceeds to insult those who respond. It is not the best way to get results.

DerekW


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: rwn
Date: February 25, 2006 at 01:50:54 Pacific
Reply:

I can understand the frustration Steve has, but the fact that the "originating" ip resides in the philippines is usually a good indication that the address is spoofed(could be wrong tho). But for all you know it could be your next door neighbor. Plus alot of isps don't use static ips so that certain ip could belong to a number of computers at different times not to even mention proxies (notice how sometimes even your own ip changes?). So the only offensive for a homeuser/novice is to use a good firewall antivirus combo, and reporting the ip to your email provider (most have spam filters). And sorry for repeating this, but most spammers are usually tech savy so if you get back at them, they WILL get back at you, usually alot worse than you expected, think id theft, dos, etc... The thing is not to take spamming that personally it happens to everyone at some point. This is not a defitist attitude but you usually have to learn alot before you can even get back at them which just doesn't rest well with most people unless they're really interested. In case you really are just google computer security.

Truth can become lie, but if lies become truth we're in trouble.



0

Response Number 7
Name: Bryco
Date: February 25, 2006 at 06:36:10 Pacific
Reply:

Just say:

"God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference."

or go with:

Count your blessings instead of your crosses;
Count your gains instead of your losses.

Count your joys instead of your woes;
Count your friends instead of your foes.

Count your smiles instead of your tears;
Count your courage instead of your fears.

Count your full years instead of your lean;
Count your kind deeds instead of your mean.

Count your health instead of your wealth;
Love your neighbor as much as yourself.

The best way to get back at the purp is to get smarter with using your computer which is or can be an open doorway into your home.

I am highly confident that the attack was not personally against you as that is how these things work. Some people just get their jollies trying to mess with as many people as they can.

Feel sorry for them instead of yourself.

Regards,
Bryan
(not the preacher I appear to be right now)


0

Response Number 8
Name: Derek
Date: February 25, 2006 at 11:48:21 Pacific
Reply:

Yep, and at the end of the day the top experts of all countries are already well into this stuff.

Anyone can look at Message source. The spammers are well aware of this fact when they do their dirty deeds.

Sadly it takes far more than a few guys/gals on a forum to make any headway with expert criminals.

DerekW


0

Response Number 9
Name: A Certain TH
Date: February 25, 2006 at 15:04:36 Pacific
Reply:

In response number 3, you make a huge point of saying this is not revenge, as if anyone suggesting you might be doing just that had completely missed your very much more superior standpoint. But the title of your post is "How do I get back at virus spammer?".

Bit of a cryptic title if you specifically meant not revenge. But maybe thats just your cleverness showing through...


I have no clue how to help you, but I do know a little about international legal disputes. Are you sure that this is actually a crime in the Phillipines?



0

Response Number 10
Name: Steve Hopper
Date: February 25, 2006 at 15:47:23 Pacific
Reply:

Hi Everybody,

I appreciate each and every string. I do not flame any effort to share your experiences. And in our professions, we are sorely aware of those who seek revenge as opposed to changing their ways. But if we do not ourselves do the right thing, what can we expect from those who do not?

As spam is illegal in Europe and yet not in west, that fact alone tells us we accept it.

Until servers are forced to do the right thing as opposed to denying us service, they will continue to get away with their support of crime.

Change will not happen unless we assume the responsibility that our governments are ignoring.

Collectively, we as individuals have the power to bring about change. So why not get together and try to do it?

Now please, back to the issue. What can 'we' at least try to do here?

Regards and hap-e-trails, Steve Hopper



0

Response Number 11
Name: Bryco
Date: February 25, 2006 at 16:02:58 Pacific
Reply:

Steve,

The problem does not lie within the email that effected you.

There is the lieklyhood that that fact that you were sucked into it may very well result in you sending it to everyone in your address book.

Should those recipients try to "get back at you"? Of course not. The originator of your plight is long since forgotten.

Their best defense or cure to the problem is through education. Teach people not to buy into spam. Teach them to scrutinize each and every piece of email that comes their way. And, most importantly, get some antivirus software. It is such a problem that the ISPs are giving AV software away because they are paying for the carriage of these emails.

If you walk accross the superhighway and get hit then you can not rightfully blame the individual that hit you as it is your own fault for venturing beyond your limits.

(I swear it is the AV software makers that that invent these viruses.)

Bryan


0

Response Number 12
Name: Derek
Date: February 25, 2006 at 17:09:33 Pacific
Reply:

Re #10 last line.

I think the point has been very clearly made, several times. "About zilch" from just a common or garden Message Source paste on here, which is sure to have been spoofed up to the eyeballs and/or sent on by an infected machine.

There are many leading lights already well into this sort of thing (Steve Gibson was mentioned). They have access to far better data, yet are finding the going tough.

Bryco has summed it up nicely.

DerekW


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows XP Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: How do I get back at virus spammer?

How do I get my ip back, thanks www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/how-do-i-get-my-ip-back-thanks/155057.html

How do I get pop ups back www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/how-do-i-get-pop-ups-back/67590.html

How do I get my boot.ini file read www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/how-do-i-get-my-bootini-file-read/80385.html