Computing.Net > Forums > Windows XP > HDD isnt faster then old drive

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

HDD isnt faster then old drive

Reply to Message Icon

Name: chupacabra31
Date: January 3, 2007 at 13:42:00 Pacific
OS: WinXp sp2
CPU/Ram: AMD 3500+/1 Gig Corsair R
Product: Home built
Comment:

I thought a Sata 300mbs 8meg casche hdd would be faster then a 6 year old ide 7200rpm drive. But it seems like they are the same. I mean the os performs the same as it did, games are the same. Do I maybe not have something setup exactly right?

Thanks for any input!



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: per
Date: January 3, 2007 at 13:59:49 Pacific
Reply:

Lots of info with a 3 second google search.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...


0

Response Number 2
Name: Zenith
Date: January 3, 2007 at 14:36:04 Pacific
Reply:

You're talking maybe 5 to 10 MB/sec ??

Not sure if this would very apparent to the end user in general use.

Search Engines Are Your Friends ☺
Morpheus: There is a difference between
knowing the path and walking the path. "The Matrix"


0

Response Number 3
Name: Sabertooth
Date: January 3, 2007 at 14:43:11 Pacific
Reply:

"Do I maybe not have something setup exactly right?"

While the disk may seem slow simply because of your desired expectations. Fact is - your (SATA 3Gb/s) drive's sustainable tranfer speed isn't any faster than the manufacturer expects it to be, advertised burst speed for the most part is never achieved - but it helps to move the merchandise ;-)

Practically there's hardly any impressionable speed difference nor performance disparity between similar PATA & SATA disks. However, you could have gotten a SATA disk with twice the cache or even a 10,000RPM is you really wanted something faster.



0

Response Number 4
Name: Tubesandwires
Date: January 3, 2007 at 19:46:40 Pacific
Reply:

How old is the mboard? Mboards that support SATA-2 at 300mb/sec haven't been around for all that long.
E.g. If the max IDE burst data transfer rate is 133mb/sec, and the max SATA burst data transfer rate is 150mb/sec on that mboard, you're not going to see much difference, as Zenith said.
That applies even if you use a SATA card capable of 300mb/sec to connect the new drive to - the 150mb/sec (or less)is a limit built into the mboard chipset.
And that's at the rarely achieved max burst rate - the maximum sustained data transfer rate is about a third of that and hasn't changed much in the intervening 6 years.

If you had less ram, you would probably see a small difference because the cache on the new drive is probably larger, but with your 1gb of ram the cache on the hard drive isn't used as much as it would be with less ram.


0

Response Number 5
Name: chupacabra31
Date: January 3, 2007 at 21:05:53 Pacific
Reply:

Ahh okay thanks for the 411!!

This is my motherboard

Gigabyte GA-K8NSC-939
I went to their website and it says up to 150MB/s data transfer rate


0

Related Posts

See More



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows XP Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: HDD isnt faster then old drive

formatting old drive after clone www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/formatting-old-drive-after-clone/158994.html

Why Can't Burn a CD faster then 8X www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/why-cant-burn-a-cd-faster-then-8x/158590.html

Make new Drive master Old Drive Slave www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/make-new-drive-master-old-drive-slave/29353.html