Computing.Net > Forums > Windows XP > FAT32 or NTFS?

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

FAT32 or NTFS?

Reply to Message Icon

Name: philowar
Date: February 25, 2004 at 01:48:10 Pacific
OS: WinXP
CPU/Ram: Athlon XP 2600/256mb
Comment:

I am running WinXP on a 60gb IDE drive. Which filesystem would give me overall faster performance (disk access, speed, etc): FAT32 or NTFS? I'm using FAT32 right now and don't know if I should convert. Are the benefits substantial? And if I do convert the disk, will the partition be "dirty" or degraded because I didn't format using NTFS and install clean?




Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: -Bryan-
Date: February 25, 2004 at 01:59:44 Pacific
Reply:

Hello.

One of the nicest things about computing.net is the most excellent search feature in the top-right corner of every page. FAT32 vs. NTFS has been discussed in overwhelming detail. This should keep you busy for a while. =)

http://www.computing.net/windowsxp/wwwboard/forum/47201.html

http://www.computing.net/windowsxp/wwwboard/forum/5643.html

http://www.computing.net/windowsxp/wwwboard/forum/28684.html

http://www.computing.net/windowsxp/wwwboard/forum/29038.html

http://www.computing.net/windowsxp/wwwboard/forum/96280.html

http://www.computing.net/windowsxp/wwwboard/forum/13481.html

http://www.computing.net/windowsxp/wwwboard/forum/48033.html

http://www.computing.net/windowsxp/wwwboard/forum/52043.html

http://www.computing.net/windowsxp/wwwboard/forum/72543.html

http://www.computing.net/windowsxp/wwwboard/forum/64237.html

http://www.computing.net/windowsxp/wwwboard/forum/62845.html

http://www.computing.net/windowsxp/wwwboard/forum/39270.html

http://www.computing.net/windowsxp/wwwboard/forum/39445.html

http://www.computing.net/windowsxp/wwwboard/forum/1219.html

http://www.computing.net/windowsxp/wwwboard/forum/5727.html

http://www.computing.net/windowsxp/wwwboard/forum/52031.html

http://www.computing.net/windowsxp/wwwboard/forum/40873.html


0

Response Number 2
Name: chrisman7 (by chrisman.7)
Date: February 25, 2004 at 07:08:36 Pacific
Reply:

i had a dual boot system with both and ntfs was defenitely faster
in my opinion


0

Response Number 3
Name: Tbird4point6LX97
Date: February 25, 2004 at 07:48:38 Pacific
Reply:

i disagree...
going by the sandra file system benchmark:
i have a western digital raptor serial ata hard drive and my score under fat 32 was 40,000, after converting to ntfs it went down 25% to 30,000......i then fdisk/reformatted to get fat32 back and i gained 1,000 points to bring me up to 41,000

check disk and defrag took longer, also

in my opinion, ntfs decreases performance...it may be good in other areas, though


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Related Posts

See More


Japanese to English OS editing the registry



Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows XP Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: FAT32 or NTFS?

fat32 or ntfs www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/fat32-or-ntfs/81918.html

FAT32 or NTFS? www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/fat32-or-ntfs/76174.html

FAT32 or NTFS?? www.computing.net/answers/windows-xp/fat32-or-ntfs/14221.html