Tom's Guide | Tom's Hardware | Tom's Games
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
I need some expert help in closing a security hole I have come across with Windows XP.
Couple of months back, I saw a guy 'work' his way around the security of Windows XP Pro. Whilst at a workstation logged in under a limited user account the guy called up the command prompt, entered a command to start an .exe file on a timer.
What he then did was setup explorer.exe to start within, say, 1 minute. He then did a ctrl+alt+del and under the processes tab ended explorer.exe
What this did was in effect kick him out of his current session as he had in effect shutdown Windows, only a blue screen was displayed - no login screen or anything. but 1 minute later, the command kicked in and Windows restarted.
When Windows re-started he was then "logged" in as an admin. There were no permissions or restrictions on anything.
Does anybody know where i can find the syntax for the command prompt so i can see exactly what is happening and then try to disable this workaround.
Obviously, since somebody has to login under a limited username/password first, before switching, it would be easy to determine the last user if any damage was done - however, I have no idea if it could be proven that said user performed the above 'cheat' and therefor caused the damage.
Thanks for your help with this.
D.

Cool trick but I think you missed observing something.
To schedule something you would use the AT command like AT \\machinename time /interactive "explorer.exe"
But a "user" can't run the command. They get access denied.
What you describe works under power user or admin status. Though I have as yet to verify what the rights status is since I was in as an admin when I did the procedure you describe and didn't see any differnece after the procedure.
Give a person a fish, they eat for a day. Suggest they internet search and they learn a skill for a lifetime.

![]() |
![]() |
![]() |

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.
| Ads by Google |