Computing.Net > Forums > Windows Vista > Grafics card sucks?

Grafics card sucks?

Reply to Message Icon

Original Message
Name: Cody (by codyrichter)
Date: July 25, 2007 at 09:23:57 Pacific
Subject: Grafics card sucks?
OS: vista
CPU/Ram: quad core/2gigs ddr2
Model/Manufacturer: Acer/myself
Comment:

Hi guys,
Just built a gaming rig, installed the video card drivers and all, but the grafics suck for game play and vista is only rating it a "1.0"...its a Radeon x1650. Any ideas what could be causeing such horible grafics or is the card really a junky card?
thanks

Always back up...I JUST LOST 287 gigs entertainment!


Report Offensive Message For Removal


Response Number 1
Name: Sabertooth
Date: July 25, 2007 at 10:13:00 Pacific
Subject: Grafics card sucks?
Reply: (edit)

There's quite a few flavors of that card, there's the DDR2 & DDR3 version, there's X1650 Vanilla, there's Pro & there's XT. Regardless, even the fastest flavor is not what I would equip a newly built "gaming" machine with.

If you happen to have the lowest performing version of the card .... then there's your problem. So, what do you have & what games are you having problems with?


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 2
Name: The Faz
Date: July 25, 2007 at 16:06:05 Pacific
Subject: Grafics card sucks?
Reply: (edit)

Even my laptop's GMA 950 scores a 3.0!
If memory serves me well, that card should be at around 4.0.

Stupid question, but after installing the drivers, did you refresh the score? It doesn't update by itself after installing new hardware/drivers.


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 3
Name: Cody (by codyrichter)
Date: July 25, 2007 at 19:20:48 Pacific
Subject: Grafics card sucks?
Reply: (edit)

ok, i'm stupid....YES I REFRESHED TEH SCORE lol....i forgot to install direct x, after in stalling that my comp now scores a 6 on video and the hd only scores 5.6


Always back up...I JUST LOST 287 gigs entertainment!


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 4
Name: Sabertooth
Date: July 26, 2007 at 06:52:00 Pacific
Subject: Grafics card sucks?
Reply: (edit)

Vista by default comes with DX 10 & you shouldn't have needed to do anything on your part to fully implement it, I am also not even sure just how you installed it. Either way, the X1650 is a sub-par card for a gaming system with a quad-core CPU.



Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 5
Name: Cody (by codyrichter)
Date: July 26, 2007 at 11:56:08 Pacific
Subject: Grafics card sucks?
Reply: (edit)

i dloded direct x from microsoft...idk why, but it made it work. Games run pretty good now even though thte cards not great. HL2, Call of duty, GTA san andrais , hl2 all run great...pluss video editing just got tons faster. It is a sub par card, and i plan on upgrading, but i ran out of money after getting the quad core, i figgured i could always upgrade the video later, and that card only cost me 90 bucks. Any recomendations of a gaming vid card <300 bucks?

Always back up...I JUST LOST 287 gigs entertainment!


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal


Response Number 6
Name: Sabertooth
Date: July 27, 2007 at 06:31:31 Pacific
Subject: Grafics card sucks?
Reply: (edit)

Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 7
Name: rossirep
Date: August 4, 2007 at 13:36:33 Pacific
Subject: Grafics card sucks?
Reply: (edit)

8800 gts 320mb - oc's superbly..

E2160 @ 2.8ghz - Abit AB9 Pro - DDR2 667 2gb @ 1:1 - BFG 8800GTS 320mb GPU


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal






Use following form to reply to current message:

   Name: From My Computing.Net Settings
 E-Mail: From My Computing.Net Settings

Subject: Grafics card sucks?

Comments:

 


  Homepage URL (*): 
Homepage Title (*): 
         Image URL: 
 
Data Recovery Software




How often do you use Computing.Net?

Every Day
Once a Week
Once a Month
This Is My First Time!


View Results

Poll Finishes In 3 Days.
Discuss in The Lounge