Computing.Net > Forums > Windows NT > Windows NT or Unix?

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Windows NT or Unix?

Reply to Message Icon

Name: wures6
Date: April 16, 2004 at 00:05:14 Pacific
OS: Windows XP
CPU/Ram: Athlon XP 3000
Comment:

Hello. I have a scenario. Suppose I am recommending to management either of these packages to implement for our network. I would like to know the pros and cons of each.

This is what I think I know so far. Please correct me if I have anything in the wrong place and add anything that may be helpful.

UNIX
Pros: Supports multi-users, cheaper or free package, multitasking, faster processing speeds.

Cons: Steep learning curve, less software support, smaller userbase.


WINDOWS NT
Pros: Easier to use, multitasking, more software support, bigger userbase, classic Windows interface.

Cons: No multi-user support, more expensive package, slower processing speeds.



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: uli_glueck
Date: April 16, 2004 at 01:27:04 Pacific
Reply:


First of all I´m administrating a Network with NT clients and now I´m learning linux cause of changing the os.
So I have experience with NT and know the problems. From (unix based ) Linux only theory and testing, but no practise. Sorry.


here some NT cons:
no usb support
no fire wire support

no Support from Microsoft for NT any more.

problems with new Chipsets. (they can be really big)

unix:

for unix you have to check which applications you need.
for the user it is not more difficult to use then NT. Also windows desktops available.
The Admins have to do more "homework" to learn unix.

pro:
if you only need office applications
open office is fine.
It can what microsoft office can.
The admins have much more possibilitis then with windows.

con:
no autocad...
no Adobe Products.

hope this helps a little.

greetings
uli


0

Response Number 2
Name: El-Trucha
Date: April 18, 2004 at 17:02:54 Pacific
Reply:

I think UNIX doesn't have a user interface...that's what my cousin says, but Linux is very good!! I have tried it before...
And I also tried WinNT4 before, and it's like Win95, but with more things...

El-Trucha


0

Response Number 3
Name: butzabear
Date: April 23, 2004 at 03:20:36 Pacific
Reply:

Have you considered Windows 2003 Server? WinNT is not a good way to go now. As mentioned in previous post, there is no more support.


0

Response Number 4
Name: El-Trucha
Date: April 23, 2004 at 07:47:28 Pacific
Reply:

WINDOWS 2003 SERVER SUX!!!
I ordered the demo from Microsoft last year, and it doesn't have NOTHING!!! NOT EVEN PAINT!!!!!

El-Trucha


0

Response Number 5
Name: Malx
Date: May 2, 2004 at 19:12:20 Pacific
Reply:

Windows NT does have (limited) Multiuser capabilities.

UNIX has plenty of software. Commercial UNIXes do have UIs (although ugly) and Linux has some quite nice ones. But in a server context, there are lots of servers and they're all *free*. No CALs, no server licencing. Web, Mail, News, IRC, Proxies, File and Print, the lot.

(my contribution: free SOCKS: http://yallara.cs.rmit.edu.au/~malsmith/products/antinat/ )
- M


0

Related Posts

See More



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows NT Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Windows NT or Unix?

Windows NT vs. Unix www.computing.net/answers/windows-nt/windows-nt-vs-unix/6769.html

NT vs Unix www.computing.net/answers/windows-nt/nt-vs-unix/1003.html

IDE RAID with Windows NT or 2000 www.computing.net/answers/windows-nt/ide-raid-with-windows-nt-or-2000/19285.html