Recently I ran SiSoft SANDRA to test my system, one of the interesting suggestion from the software is to "Use a fixed-size swap file. This is faster than variable-size swap file." (Tip T2005) Is it true? If so what size should I set for the virtual Memory? Thanks in advance! EK

It depends on how much memory you have but 2 to 2 1/2 times your system memory seems about right. Then, you can use a utility like Norton to move the swap file to the beginning of the drive.

I could be wrong, but if memory serves me correctly that after you fix the VM settings and then run a defrag, it will automatically place it in the front of the drive. I personally steer away from any of the Norton/McAffee Utility progs because they seem to cause more problems than they fix. And as far as size goes I set the minimum to 2 times the ram and the max to 2 1/2 times the ram.   HopeThisHelps,   -me-

jFrOg, I'm not sure that you get the most benefit from using a difference in the two settings. This would still require windows to do a calculation to determine required size and I'm not sure if it would set it aside as a block because it does not know that the current size won't change. (If it sets aside the maximum size anyway, why use a smaller minimum setting?) Just a thought. I really don't know for sure. I think I've told you before, but, cool frog.

Thinking about it, I think you are right about that. I will have to make some adjustments.  Thanx for the compliment.   -me-

the fixed size swap file has two benefits - the cpu does not have constantly to recalculate the size of the swap file from the free space on your hd - if min=max then the swap file will not get fragmented(it takes much more time to access a diferent location on the harddrive than just continue reading/writing to the same location) ...regardless of amount of physical RAM you probably dont need more than 200 meg swap file... the rule of thumb 2.5 x physical memory was valied for small amounts of RAM couple years ago... it is easy to monitor how big the swap file gets for couple days and then round it reasonably higher and set the min and the max to the same value.... also your first partition might not be the fastest... i checked on pcpitstop my first partition with swap file on it and then my second partition with swap file on the second one... my second partition is faster because it is not fragmented at all and does not get fragmented even with the fixed swap file on it.. the fist partition has still some scathered system files around it that cant be moved easily... i would not use any nortons or mcafees to mess the swap file up The speed difference is anyhow not noticable... the only things that are noticable are much less hard drive thrashing and much faster defrag Regards

aaah sh##t, i gotta agree with miro, as much as it goes against the grain(lol). except for nortons utilities. those are ok if you do a custom install and use only windoctor,diskdoctor, speeddisk,optimizer and registry editor. anything else from nortons i leave right alone.