Computing.Net > Forums > Windows Me > Another Swap file question

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Another Swap file question

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Scott Redmond
Date: March 25, 2003 at 06:42:08 Pacific
OS: Windows Me build 3000
CPU/Ram: AMD Duron 1002Mhz/256MB r
Comment:

What about setting youe second hard drive as the swap file with a minimum of 0 and a maximum equal to the size of the drive? I have a second hard drive on one of my computers that was not getting used so that is what I did to experiment. what do you think? 20GB swap file. :-)



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: WhitPhil
Date: March 25, 2003 at 10:32:46 Pacific
Reply:

Before even starting to muck with the swapfile, see how much you actually use it.
Run SYSMON, and monitor Swapfile in use, not size.
Then, if you find you do make extensive use of it, monitor swapfile Size and use that number (plus a few MBs of fudge factor) as your MIN setting.


0

Response Number 2
Name: RayMan
Date: March 25, 2003 at 13:06:00 Pacific
Reply:

I'm not sure how ME handles swap files but as a rule of thumb, a swap file need only be 2 and a half times the amount of RAM on your sustem. In W95 and W98 it was a good idea to point the swap file at a dedicated partition slightly larger than that. that way any defragging would leave it alone.


0

Response Number 3
Name: WhitPhil
Date: March 25, 2003 at 13:56:33 Pacific
Reply:

As a rule, the rule of 2x or 2.5 times is invalid.

A swapfile depends on the amount of ram installed and the applications that you run. There is no magic formula to calculate the required size.


0

Response Number 4
Name: TheGorx
Date: March 25, 2003 at 14:29:02 Pacific
Reply:

well, it depends on the drive
If it's a slow small drive slaved to your other hard drive it might not be very good.


If it's on a fast drive on a separate ide channel you might get better performance.

TheGorx - Windows Help


0

Response Number 5
Name: scootr
Date: March 25, 2003 at 14:47:52 Pacific
Reply:

it is always better to have the swapfile on a drive that is not accessed much. For instance... if you only have one drive, the programs AND swapfile are both being accessed and written too. If you have a second drive and use it solely for a swapfile drive.. access times to both drives would be more efficient. However, if the drive is a slow drive, slow access times...

I purchased a 10gb WD 7200 rpm drive and use it solely as a swapfile drive. System performance has increased noticeably.. espcially whenn playing games. (a good high speed ATA capable mother board will increase the performance also).

If you use the second drive as a swap drive, set it up as master drive on secondary IDE (as to not use same IDE channel for Swap and program access). Setup the swap file to "let windows manage"... much more efficient. Windows ME will adjust the size of the swap file to what it needs.

good luck
Scootr


0

Related Posts

See More



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows Me Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Another Swap file question

Swap File Questions... www.computing.net/answers/windows-me/swap-file-questions/20090.html

Swap File www.computing.net/answers/windows-me/swap-file/19090.html

swap file tweak www.computing.net/answers/windows-me/swap-file-tweak/9883.html