Computing.Net > Forums > Windows 95/98 > What's ChunkSize=512?

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

What's ChunkSize=512?

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Zbriegnew
Date: June 9, 2002 at 09:17:19 Pacific
Comment:

I found this line in the system.ini file under [vcache] as I tried to edit it for a higher amount of RAM:

ChunkSize=512

What's that?



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: sam
Date: June 9, 2002 at 11:29:15 Pacific
Reply:

Just a guess but ... that's the normal size of sectors on a hard drive.


0

Response Number 2
Name: Vito
Date: June 9, 2002 at 11:51:23 Pacific
Reply:

Hi Zbriegnew,

The Vcache in System.ini is relative to you RAM size and whether you manage virtual memory yourself. Personally i leave it up to Windows as it makes the entire unused area of the HD available for caching.

It will not be of any benefit to alter the chucksize. This should be set to 512. However, if you are managing your own virtual memory, you can set your MinFileCache and MaxFileCache here.

These should be set to around a quarter of your total RAM. IE, for 128MB RAM the setting would be ideal at 32768 and that applies for both Min and Max.


vito@supanet.com


0

Response Number 3
Name: Dan Penny
Date: June 9, 2002 at 12:59:44 Pacific
Reply:

"ChunkSize" specifies the size of each block of cache memory buffer.


0

Response Number 4
Name: Dan Penny
Date: June 9, 2002 at 13:03:00 Pacific
Reply:

Also look here;

http://www.rojakpot.com/Speed_Demonz/Chunksize_Optimization/Chunksize_Optimization_01.htm


0

Response Number 5
Name: rac
Date: June 9, 2002 at 13:29:12 Pacific
Reply:

Recommended for 128 or less RAM is no max or min VCache size -- let Windows do its thing. Tests have (apparently) shown that for RAM above 128MB, a max and min VCache (both the same) of no more than 70% of RAM may improve PC performance.


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: WhitPhil
Date: June 9, 2002 at 20:05:32 Pacific
Reply:

I agree with rac about the "let Windows 98 do it's thing".

BUT, you do not want to set a MIN on the cache.
If you do you are DEDICATING that amount of ram to the cache, whether it is needed or not.
If it is not required, windows can not use this ram for any other purpose, and if memory is required, it will resort to swapping.

The "70% rule" that is starting to appear is for the MaxFileCache setting. On some larger ram boxes (512 and under), there are reports that windows is slow to release the cache resulting in performance issues.
This parameter places an upper limit on what can be used.


vito: BTW, vcache has nothing to do with managing virtual memory. It is also not using the "entire unused area of the HD for caching". This is the File Cache and it is in memory (ram).


0

Response Number 7
Name: rac
Date: June 10, 2002 at 05:22:18 Pacific
Reply:

Whoops -- I misread the pen scratches that pass for "notes" in my tech file. Whitphil is (as usual)correct. The 70% is for the MAX value only.


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows 95/98 Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: What's ChunkSize=512?

NetZero... What's the story? www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/netzero-whats-the-story/62520.html

backup.reg what's it all about? www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/backupreg-whats-it-all-about/147837.html

What's this all mean? www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/whats-this-all-mean/162037.html