Computing.Net > Forums > Windows 95/98 > Taking ownership of drive

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Taking ownership of drive

Reply to Message Icon

Name: bonifieddaytona1969
Date: January 24, 2005 at 12:25:41 Pacific
OS: 95
CPU/Ram: 64
Comment:

We installed a second hard drive in our system from another system. When we try to access that drive we get an error stating something to the effect that we don't have permission. This drive is formatted with windows 95 and i can access it in the old system. In 95, how do we take ownership of that drive so we can access it?

Thanks.



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: jboy
Date: January 24, 2005 at 12:31:49 Pacific
Reply:

What is the actual error message?

I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?


0

Response Number 2
Name: bonifieddaytona1969
Date: January 24, 2005 at 12:41:20 Pacific
Reply:

Error message is "drive is not formatted",(remember drive works fine in other system) it also shows the drive to be full and empty at the same time.

Bon


0

Response Number 3
Name: jboy
Date: January 24, 2005 at 12:51:28 Pacific
Reply:

You say the drive was used in a Win95 system - is the system it's installed in now also Win95?

"it also shows the drive to be full and empty at the same time."

... right - you may want to explain that.

From a DOS prompt, run fdisk and report on the slave drive's status - select (5) to change drives and (4) to report

I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?


0

Response Number 4
Name: bonifieddaytona1969
Date: January 24, 2005 at 13:04:06 Pacific
Reply:

Did you read my post? I said i am using win 95.
And as for
"it also shows the drive to be full and empty at the same time." Im just stating what I see, if I could explain it I would not be here right now....right? And, why would i want to run fdisk when i know the disk runs fine in another system. It is also set on slave with the boot drive set to master and both are on seperate cables. I've seen this same error before on an xp system, it was a matter of taking ownership of the drive . It also showed the drive to be full and empty at the same time. So..that said, i'll go back to the original question...In 95, how do we take ownership of that drive so we can access it?

Bon.


0

Response Number 5
Name: jboy
Date: January 24, 2005 at 13:11:51 Pacific
Reply:

Yes, I did indeed read your post.

95 is not XP - there is no 'taking ownership' - the error you've reported is 'drive not formatted'

You seem to have things all figured out, so I'll leave you to it

I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: bonifieddaytona1969
Date: January 24, 2005 at 13:15:31 Pacific
Reply:

Thanks for nothing...


0

Response Number 7
Name: jboy
Date: January 24, 2005 at 13:21:30 Pacific
Reply:

Likewise

Garbage in = garbage out.


I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?


0

Response Number 8
Name: Tryan
Date: January 24, 2005 at 13:23:59 Pacific
Reply:

"It is also set on slave with the boot drive set to master and both are on seperate cables."

If they're on separate cables perhaps you could try setting both to master. The bootable drive should be on the primary cable and be Primary Master in the BIOS and the other drive should be on the second cable and should be Secondary Master. Both drives would be positioned on the very end slots of the cable.

Does that make sense?


Windows 98SE
HP Pavillion
Celeron 533MHz
HDD 10GB + 4GB
64MB RAM
Antiquated & Poor Quality
Runs like a dream.


0

Response Number 9
Name: Tryan
Date: January 24, 2005 at 13:26:55 Pacific
Reply:

Alternatively you can have both on the same cable with the bootable on the very end as Master and the other one in the middle as Slave.

Windows 98SE
HP Pavillion
Celeron 533MHz
HDD 10GB + 4GB
64MB RAM
Antiquated & Poor Quality
Runs like a dream.


0

Response Number 10
Name: bonifieddaytona1969
Date: January 24, 2005 at 13:33:54 Pacific
Reply:

"Likewise

Garbage in = garbage out". So..I guess that would make you a garbage can jboy?

Tyran,
Tried that too. Doesn't help...If the files were password protected is it possible that the problem lies in that area?

Bon


0

Response Number 11
Name: jboy
Date: January 24, 2005 at 13:37:44 Pacific
Reply:

Trying to solve your problem based on the cryptic and misleading information you've posted is hardly worth the effort.

Whatever desire to help there was has been quickly dispelled by your idiocy & ignorance


I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?


0

Response Number 12
Name: DAVEINCAPS
Date: January 24, 2005 at 13:46:23 Pacific
Reply:

Awh, you kids and your XP. If 9x was good enough for my pappy and grandpappy, it's good enough for me. Us rubes here don't understand all that XP stuff.

If the drive works OK in one computer but is seen as not formatted in another it's probably because the bios is seeing it differently. Put the drive back in the old computer, boot up, go into cmos and see how it's identfied there. See what it says for cylinders, heads and sectors. Then enter those values in the cmos in the new computer.

Either that or the cable is bad or loose.


0

Response Number 13
Name: Death
Date: January 24, 2005 at 13:49:58 Pacific
Reply:

You formatted the drive. Was it as fat 16. And the PC you are trying to use it in is 95 but fat 32. Could be this is why it wont let you access it.


0

Response Number 14
Name: bonifieddaytona1969
Date: January 24, 2005 at 13:50:03 Pacific
Reply:

Again...garbage in garbage out...I don't want your help...help? By the way that last post was written, your the type of person that needs a good swift kick in the behind. I guess we're all not as smart as you eh?
Thanks again for wasting my time and have a very nice day!
Bon.



0

Response Number 15
Name: Tryan
Date: January 24, 2005 at 13:51:00 Pacific
Reply:

I would have thought that if the files were password protected they wouldn't have been accessible while installed in the original computer either...

Hopefully somebody else can help further - I'm pretty much a beginner myself...

If nobody could come up with a better idea and you really need the files you could try putting the drive back in the original computer as master along with the good bootable you're using now as slave and copying the files over that way... After that you could try re-partitioning and formatting the drive and using it for extra storage...

All depends what you're trying to accomplish.

Best of Luck
Tracey

Windows 98SE
HP Pavillion
Celeron 533MHz
HDD 10GB + 4GB
64MB RAM
Antiquated & Poor Quality
Runs like a dream.


0

Response Number 16
Name: Death
Date: January 24, 2005 at 13:53:22 Pacific
Reply:

leave the drive in the pc you are going to use it in. Then use a startup floppy disk and reformat the slave drive from there. Then restart the pc and see if you can access it then.


0

Response Number 17
Name: jboy
Date: January 24, 2005 at 13:54:33 Pacific
Reply:

"I guess we're all not as smart as you eh? "

Heh - it would sure seem that you're not, anyways.

Things progress more smoothly here if you work with the folks offering suggestions, not argue with them.


I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?


0

Response Number 18
Name: bonifieddaytona1969
Date: January 24, 2005 at 14:04:16 Pacific
Reply:

Death, I don't want to format the drive , I want to access the information that is there now. Also, even if it was fat16, will it not be seen by fat 32?

DAVEINCAPS, values are the same. I wrote the information down from original bios before removing it.

Tryan, never thought of that, may have to go about it this way. It may work, I just thought there may be an easier way to go about it. This
drive was on a network so I'm assuming there was a password...

Bon.


0

Response Number 19
Name: bonifieddaytona1969
Date: January 24, 2005 at 14:06:55 Pacific
Reply:

Jboy...The only one i'm arguing with is you so...can you go somewhere else? I want to figure out this problem. Thanks


As always, with much sympathy,
Bon


0

Response Number 20
Name: Tryan
Date: January 24, 2005 at 14:09:13 Pacific
Reply:

"I just thought there may be an easier way to go about it."

I can't tell you how many "five minute jobs" I have set out to do that have turned into five hour ordeals and I swear and mutter to myself that "this should be SIMPLE!". Perhaps with time and practice I will have more joy.

Keep us posted on your progress.

Tracey

Windows 98SE
HP Pavillion
Celeron 533MHz
HDD 10GB + 4GB
64MB RAM
Antiquated & Poor Quality
Runs like a dream.


0

Response Number 21
Name: jboy
Date: January 24, 2005 at 14:10:01 Pacific
Reply:

Well, good luck - apparently you'll need it.


Your 'sympathy' notwithstanding, a little work on your social skill seems to be in order

I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?


0

Response Number 22
Name: bonifieddaytona1969
Date: January 24, 2005 at 14:12:23 Pacific
Reply:

Tryan,

I know exactly what your talking about...i've responded to your post about the conexant modem...went through the same thing last week, so if I can help you with this I will try my best!

Bon


0

Response Number 23
Name: Death
Date: January 24, 2005 at 14:19:08 Pacific
Reply:

Not sure if FAT 16 will be seen by FAT 32. But just had a thought. Can you access the drive if you boot into safe mode? Hit F5 at boot up before you see the windows splash screen to get into safe mode. Not saying it will work but worth a go.


0

Response Number 24
Name: bonifieddaytona1969
Date: January 24, 2005 at 14:21:18 Pacific
Reply:

Jboy, you just don't get it do you?
I DON'T WANT YOUR QUIPS, QUOTES OR BELLIGERENT TONE! AGAIN, LEAVE ME ALONE PLEASE.

Hmmm, maybe you need the help...

Bon


0

Response Number 25
Name: Jennifer SUMN
Date: January 24, 2005 at 14:46:30 Pacific
Reply:

Where's Justin when we need a grown-up?


0

Response Number 26
Name: DAVEINCAPS
Date: January 24, 2005 at 15:15:50 Pacific
Reply:

If the drive is partitoned fat32 and the 95 version you're running on the system now is an older one that doesn't see fat32, that may be the problem.

Does it have a drive overlay on it?

Run fdisk, Y to large disk support, then use option 5 to go to the questionable drive. Then option 4. Exactly what does it say?


0

Response Number 27
Name: SkipCox
Date: January 24, 2005 at 15:20:06 Pacific
Reply:

Good question Jennifer...

FAT32 will read FAT32, FAT16 and FAT12.

Assuming that drive works in the machine it came out of, it's either misconfigured or misinstalled. Without knowing exactly how it is installed and jumpered, it's anyone's guess. Some machines want master/slave configurations and some want cable select.

How about details of the system it came out of, details about the system it wont work in, how you have it connected and how you have it jumpered?

We have absolutely zero information from you at this point and you take offense at the garbage in...garbage out comment?

You're gonna run off anyone who wants to help you with this attitude. You might want to start over.

Skip


0

Response Number 28
Name: Dave357
Date: January 24, 2005 at 16:06:57 Pacific
Reply:

Bon, Jboy is one of the more knowledgeable and well-respected contributors on this Win9x forum and several others as well. It is you who is out of line here.

Why do you continue to resist efforts to help? Go into fdisk, check the drive, and report the information back here, as you have already been asked to do by two contributors. Also, what is the EXACT operating system installed on your boot drive? Win95 came in four major distributions...Win95 Original, Win95A, Win95B, and Win95C. Win95 Original Release and Win95A were not capable of recognizing FAT32 partitions. Large disc support was only added in Win95B and Win95C. This is probably the cause of your problems, but with you being so unwilling to supply any additional information, it's a bit of a "mind-reading" exercise.

Garbage in--garbage out.

Drop the attitude & post back the additional information.

We'll be happy to help you sort this out.

HTH

Dave

If a Man is talking in the forest and there is no woman there to hear him, is he still wrong?


0

Response Number 29
Name: Dave357
Date: January 24, 2005 at 16:23:06 Pacific
Reply:

>it also shows the drive to be full and empty at the same time.

As Jboy replied...

>... right - you may want to explain that.

Where, exactly is the drive being reported as full & empty. In fdisk, Windows Explorer, My Computer, or...???

Dave


0

Response Number 30
Name: Bryco
Date: January 24, 2005 at 17:19:18 Pacific
Reply:

"full and empty at the same time."

I too, would like to have that explained a little more.
Are there two entries for the drive in Windows Explorer where one entry shows as Zero used and zero free and the other shows some data?

I woke up this morning and I didn't know what time it was. My wife said, "look at the clock". I said, "mind your own business and keep your attitide to yourself".
The funeral is tomorrow.

Jboy is a good helper.

Some people; huh?

Bryan


0

Response Number 31
Name: bonifieddaytona1969
Date: January 24, 2005 at 17:36:55 Pacific
Reply:

Thanks guys, I'll figure it out myself.

Bon


0

Response Number 32
Name: Dave357
Date: January 24, 2005 at 17:49:29 Pacific
Reply:

That's the smartest thing you've said.


0

Response Number 33
Name: Derek
Date: January 24, 2005 at 18:59:35 Pacific
Reply:

Yet another of those posters that kinda thinks he half knows the answer, so refuses to accept anything else.

I see no reason to argue, for example, with the harmless use of fdisk in order to gain information in order to help diagnose the problem. If the poster thought (wrongly) this would loose data then he could have asked that question.

The use of "this" drive and "that" drive in the original post was a masterpiece of how not to convey information. Rudely suggesting that jboy hadn't read the post properly is no way to behave when seeking help.

I think some posters imagine this is a free service paid from taxes, rather than folks from all over the world pitching in to try and help them for free.

Post #32 was spot on.

Derek.W


0

Response Number 34
Name: Mechanix2Go
Date: January 25, 2005 at 00:12:12 Pacific
Reply:

If clear expression is an indicator of clear thinking, guess what blithering indicates.

The OP has managed toalienate jboy; and that ain't easy.

I think the early / late 95 is about right.

Bon, as far as I know there's no "ownership" in 9x. Keep in mind that winders picks one of a number of canned msgs to respond to any given situation. And sometimes gets it wrong.

As far as "full and empty"...That pretty much defies comment.

While we're at it, the siplest way to get partition info, rather than talking the owner through the fdisk menus is:

fdisk /status

and it eliminates the possibilities of getting it wrong inside fdisk. Not to mention avoiding the chance of an uninformed user hosing up existing partitions.

Derek,

Everything back to normal in merry 'ol England?

Tracey,

I though I was the only one who turns five minute deals into five hour fiascos.

;)

M2


0

Response Number 35
Name: Tryan
Date: January 25, 2005 at 01:51:30 Pacific
Reply:

lol, I guess it's a more common ailment than I thought :)


0

Response Number 36
Name: anenefan
Date: January 25, 2005 at 02:59:29 Pacific
Reply:

Hi

First what are both drives and what system have you installed them in.

As a quick test, drop the troublesome drive in as master. Hopefully it wasn't from an older Compaq or the like.

You will need to run Fdisk to sort that out, if that's the case.

Next - its a help forum, but those who use a sharp barbed tounge should expect a reaction every now and again. Some people are sensitive, more than usual, when things have "exploded on the benchtop".

In this case, I think it was very unfair that jboy got yelled at. But then, once you have a reputation, those sort of things tend to happen.

In jboys defence, one expects a member to have looked though a few sample questions, and worked out actual error messages are important. Simple tests/diagnostics are important. No-one cares for the Psychic Diagnostic Method, wheather in the same room or half way around the world.

" also shows the drive to be full and empty at the same time." Importantly, what indicated this. Is it a graph or...



0

Response Number 37
Name: Jennifer SUMN
Date: January 25, 2005 at 06:21:40 Pacific
Reply:

"And, why would i want to run fdisk when i know the disk runs fine in another system." That statement makes me wonder if Daytona even knows the function of fdisk and/or how to use it.


0

Response Number 38
Name: dj3642
Date: January 25, 2005 at 07:28:06 Pacific
Reply:

this may sound stupid. wont be the first time i have done that LOL. but what happens if you take the win 95 drive,.and put it into the second PC by ITSELF.. with no other drive in it.. will it boot up so you are able to read it then??..if youa re. then obviously it has to do with the 2 HD together.. just a suggestion..


0

Response Number 39
Name: Derek
Date: February 25, 2005 at 16:10:30 Pacific
Reply:

Ignore this folks. Just trying an idea to get an automatic red signature (well, at least it makes this wasted post of some value).

Congrats welcome if my "Guess your way through HTML" actually works.

Derek.W


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Com Port 3 Win 98 Bootup Problem



Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows 95/98 Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Taking ownership of drive

How long does it take to format drive C www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/how-long-does-it-take-to-format-drive-c/121472.html

integrity of drive www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/integrity-of-drive/126191.html

How can I monitor a shared disk www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/how-can-i-monitor-a-shared-disk/83297.html