Computing.Net > Forums > Windows 95/98 > ScanDisk vs HDD Regenerator?

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

ScanDisk vs HDD Regenerator?

Reply to Message Icon

Name: pyro6enesis
Date: November 5, 2004 at 06:13:21 Pacific
OS: Win98SE
CPU/Ram: 128.0MB
Comment:

Hello, I searched high and low and can not find an answer, so here I am :)
I reinstalled Windows overtop the itself to straighten out some problems and it reported that I had NO bad sectors during the reinstallment. I ran scandisk and found that I had 581,632 Bytes in Bad Sectors to my surprise. I then used HDD Regenerator 1.41 to see if it could be fixed. HDD Regenerator repaired 6 bad sectors. I ran ScanDisk again and got the report as to having 581,626 bad sectors. I ran HDD Reg 1.41 again and it said everything was fine. Ran ScanDisk one more time and it still had the same report of 581,626 bad sectors. I don't know what to believe or what else I should try. Can anyone please help me with this problem? Thanks



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: jam
Date: November 5, 2004 at 06:29:05 Pacific
Reply:

Try using the software designed for your hard drive...go to the drive manufacturer's website & download their diagnostics program.

Or try here:

http://www.benchmarkhq.ru/english.html?/be_hdd2.html

Asus A7N8X-X
1800+ @8x210mhz
512mb PC3200
Ti4200/8X 128mb
WDC 60GB


0

Response Number 2
Name: anenefan
Date: November 5, 2004 at 06:34:10 Pacific
Reply:

Hi

The integrity of the starage surface can determined by a range of programs. Some will be lax and some are more through. How they can determine trouble can vay as well. (sorry - I don't have a proper answer for you)

Suggest you try the hard drive diagnostic generally available at the manufacture's website.


0

Response Number 3
Name: jubalsams
Date: November 5, 2004 at 07:59:34 Pacific
Reply:

You can force ScanDisk for Windows to retest bad clusters by modifying the value
for the following registry key:

HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Applets\Check Drive\Settings

This registry key will exist only if ScanDisk for Windows has already ran once.
To have ScanDisk test clusters that have been marked as bad, modify the Settings
value so that the last two digits are "04." For example, if the current value
for Settings is
B1 03 40 00

change it to read:
B1 03 40 04

Once you modify the value for Settings, ScanDisk for Windows will retest any
clusters marked as bad. This only lasts one time.

******************************************************************************


0

Response Number 4
Name: mosaddique
Date: November 5, 2004 at 08:16:22 Pacific
Reply:

I think you have to use the hard drive manufacturers utility to fill the hard drive with zeros (to create a factory clean hard drive) then format after partitioning. If HDD regenerator did clear some bad sectors then your report will now show fewer or no bad sectors.

I believe that once windows has recorded a sector as bad it will not put it back to clean. I could be wrong though.

___________________________________________
When everything else fails, read the instructions.


0

Response Number 5
Name: DAVEINCAPS
Date: November 5, 2004 at 12:30:28 Pacific
Reply:

Scandisk 'fixes' a bad sector by marking it bad so the OS won't use it. I'm not familiar with HDD regenerator but perhaps it does the same thing. Or maybe it retested the sectors marked bad and found that they were actually bad.

Occasionally spots get marked bad that are actually good but there's no way to repair a spot that really is bad.


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: pyro6enesis
Date: November 5, 2004 at 13:34:34 Pacific
Reply:

Good Afternoon,
I tried Jams links and found it of no use but thankyou Jam ;)the manufacturer of my computer has no diagnostic tools for my computer but does have for newer models.I saw a webpage somewhere just today about what jubalsams mentioned. I would like to know more about it first. My goal is to find out if my HD is really fixed or made to look fixed. I'd rather know for certain before deciding to do a full format. I hate full formats because it means reinstalling the screen calibration, modem drives to every other little detail etc. I've heard some say that HDD Regenerator is great but how do I know that those people are not working for a scam artist. How will I know that HDD Regenerator is a scam or not. wink!!! :) This is something I have to question because ScanDisk tells me a different story.


0

Response Number 7
Name: anenefan
Date: November 5, 2004 at 21:06:43 Pacific
Reply:

Hi

You could use a generic tester available from ontrack. Its a 30 day trial tool, but I've found it useful.

Scandisk can get it wrong in a few situations, but this generally involves scandisk being corrupted or a virus infection. That reminds me there was some method to remove the mapped bad sectors without going into the registry, but I'm coming up blank at the moment. Perhaps it was a batch file. During virus removal, something had to remap the drive , and free all the clusters which weren't really bad. I'm geting #$%# annoyed I can't remember the specifics - anyhow probably a sign I should sleep more.

On another note -- What is your hard drive --the brand and model.

I'd suggest you get another drive and ghost or image or just plain copy the drive across to the new one.

A lot of utilities cash in on this apparent cluster recovery.

There are a couple of things that can happen to the media surface.

Physical damage, which is common in most drives as they slowly wear out. Some of the diagnostics used to have utilities where you could shift in spare tracks. With high capacity drives these days, they may have realised its not worthwhile to do. Generally there is a underlying cause when the physical tracks are damaged. Remapping some spare cluster in, may be possible. However, you could not entirely trust the drive, not unless the physical damage was a result of a bump etc and was not likely to happen again.

The next -- From factory the surface media is not magnetically perfect. The drive leaves with a "defect list" from a factory scan. This is stored somewhere outside of the normal data area, eg. you can completely fill the drive from the first CHS (0,0.0) to the end of the drive and will not write over it. Its probably where the Drive ID is stored as well.

Over time, from this imperfection in the media surface, there can be what is called "growth".

I gathered from some reading some time back, this means the surface has trouble switching magnetic polarity meaning data would slowly become stuck - a semi-persistent resident magnetic field on the media. This can be fixed somewhat by writting zeros or 1's to the surface. I've had problem drives and zeroed it 10 or more times before it finally came good. I've also had a number that don't respond.

Some utilities would use this feature and you may actually recover a bad cluster. However there are some problems in doing that. Roughly speaking, a cluster is marked bad by a utility when it needs to be read more than an allocated number of times to retrieve the test data that was written. This means the cluster might be just making the grade.

If you worry about data loss, Scandisk /time -- marks any, slower than usual reads, as bad as well.



0

Response Number 8
Name: pyro6enesis
Date: November 6, 2004 at 13:20:05 Pacific
Reply:

anenefan
Could you tell me what program is under Ontrack? I tried to find it on the internet and am not sure which one you mentioned? Thankyou


0

Response Number 9
Name: anenefan
Date: November 6, 2004 at 18:30:09 Pacific
Reply:

Hi

You want dataadvisor ver 5 -- it works for 30 days. The program also installs a shortcut without asking, on your desktop. I winge about it, as if you were able to find them in the first place there is no real need for such a shortcut.

http://www.ontrack.com/freesoftware/

http://www.ontrack.com/dataadvisor/


0

Response Number 10
Name: anenefan
Date: November 6, 2004 at 19:45:00 Pacific
Reply:

Hi

I forgot to ask again, the Hard drive -- what brand and model. There may well be a diagnostic available.



0

Response Number 11
Name: pyro6enesis
Date: November 6, 2004 at 22:55:14 Pacific
Reply:

anenefan,

I'll checked it out anenefan, thankyou very much :)


0

Response Number 12
Name: pyro6enesis
Date: November 7, 2004 at 21:09:35 Pacific
Reply:

Hello anenefan,
I downloaded Data Advisor and passed all the tests. I'm going to check into some other things such as S.M.A.R.T. and try the other suggestion by jubalsams-Response Number 3.
I'll be back if I feel I need more help.
thankyou for your help, I really appreciate it
alot :)

-Pyro


0

Response Number 13
Name: pyro6enesis
Date: November 7, 2004 at 21:18:33 Pacific
Reply:

If anyone should take interest, I just found a link to S.M.A.R.T.(diagnostic-drive-hard-tool) here:

http://www.disk-utility.com/diagnostic-drive-hard-tool.html



0

Response Number 14
Name: anenefan
Date: November 8, 2004 at 03:55:45 Pacific
Reply:

Hi

Ontrack should test that (smart). Ontrack's tools were used by hard drive manufactures for quite a while.


Your link points to.
http://www.ariolic.com/activesmart/

I've tried this program a while back and it wasn't a pleasant experience uninstalling it,

Again Ontack data advisor should have tested that -- Smart..

If you havn't scanned for virii, do so. Use another version of scandisk or use the bootup dos version on the 98 install disk. The windows version is Scandskw.exe should you feel the need to use the system file checker (or just type in at Run the command SFC) to replace this file. (Only that file)

Don't use an earlier dos version of scandisk.

It would be an idea to get a second hard drive. Any laptop hard drive should be compatible so long as it does not exceed the bios hard drive size limitation.


0

Response Number 15
Name: pyro6enesis
Date: November 9, 2004 at 17:54:54 Pacific
Reply:

anenefan,

I got the results from SMART, my Hard Drive is
almost shot and my puter is showing it. I spent
my time backing up everything. I'm going to see about replacing the disk drive asap. Thank you for all your help

-Pyro


0

Response Number 16
Name: anenefan
Date: November 10, 2004 at 02:58:23 Pacific
Reply:

Hi

Very good you were able to back up. And wise to get another hard drive.

As to testing SMART -- ??? You stated it passed alll Ontracks tests.

Put it this way -- Ontrack have been about for a bit. Hard drive manufactures actually supplied a version of Ontracks diagnostics for a while there.

Chances are if it passed Ontracks SMART test then its OK.

If you have actually backed "all" fo the drive, including window and program dir -- I would do this.

Use Killdisk the free version to wipe your disk.
If you have bad clusters, I think you will have to select "skip" from time to time.

OK that done fire up the win98se install disk. Boot to dos with cd support.

OK go to the win98 dir [cd win98 ]

Try scandisk /surface

After that is done note how much was bad.

Now try scandisk /time

I'd be interested to see how much more of the disk is marked as bad.



0

Response Number 17
Name: ranfou
Date: December 11, 2004 at 20:13:51 Pacific
Reply:

Hey there,
HDD regenerator reports fixed sectors as still bad in scandisk unless you repartition the drive to update the marked sectors.

Here is what the website says:

Note HDD Regenerator does not change the logical structure of a hard disk drive. Therefore the file system may contain logical bad sectors marked earlier, and other disk utilities such as Scandisk will detect bad sectors even if the hard drive is successfully regenerated by HDD Regenerator. To remove non-existent bad sectors from the file table, repartition your hard disk drive or use PowerQuest PartitionMagic (Bad Sector Retest option)


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows 95/98 Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: ScanDisk vs HDD Regenerator?

HDD Regenerator v1.31 www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/hdd-regenerator-v131/153000.html

scandisk vs chkdsk www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/scandisk-vs-chkdsk/108597.html

DOS Scandisk vs. Windows Scandisk www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/dos-scandisk-vs-windows-scandisk/95542.html