Computing.Net > Forums > Windows 95/98 > Safe Mode CD-Rom and Networking...

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Safe Mode CD-Rom and Networking...

Reply to Message Icon

Name: roamer_1
Date: August 9, 2005 at 11:54:19 Pacific
OS: 98SE
CPU/Ram: varies, multi
Comment:

Hi all,

I have built a little utility that allows CDROM and disk-caching in safe mode by using VIDE_CDD.SYS, SHSUCDX.COM, and SMARTCDX.exe. It simply loads these DOS drivers before calling WIN /d:m.

It got me thinking, and I am surely not the first...

Has anyone tried to get networking in 9x safe mode by loading DOS networking in the same fashion??

Surely WIN would inherit the drivers... Just wondered if anyone ever tried it to save me the time beating this dead horse??

Bruce



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: Rimfire
Date: August 9, 2005 at 17:04:56 Pacific
Reply:

The question is, why would you want to?

The idea of safe mode is to run windows with a minimal setup so that if windows cannot boot, you can still access the desktop without loading the programs or services that are causing the problem. You still have tools such as msconfig to isolate the problem when booting to normal mode.

A standard win98 startup disk with the addition of network drivers might be an easier way to achieve what you want, albeit without the convenience of a browser.


0

Response Number 2
Name: jboy
Date: August 9, 2005 at 17:05:49 Pacific
Reply:

The CD thing has been done before - DOS networking is a tad bit thornier, and the drivers aren't as generic. DOS network drivers are usually enormous memory hogs as well.

There is such a thing (already) as 'Safe Mode with Network Support'

Computers in the future may have only 1,000 vacuum tubes and perhaps only weigh 1 1/2 tons.


- Popular Mechanics, 1949


0

Response Number 3
Name: roamer_1
Date: August 10, 2005 at 04:44:54 Pacific
Reply:

Hi, Rimfire...

As a service tech, I am often faced with boxes that are not working properly where it would be nice to just boot safe and pushh the client's data off to a server before rubbing the drive off.. or to access programs from my server to assist in fixing it for that matter...I know I can just pull the drive and shove it in a testbench, but anymore the transfers are gettin huge, and will tie up a bench for a long while...


PS: JBoy- Thanks for the thoughts... I know the real mode drivers are big, and I have DOS access, FWIW, and that is precisely why I am inquiring.

I am aware of the MSDOS.SYS tweak to enable network support in safe, but unfortunately, it doesn't seem to work... It is the same thing as WIN /D:N from a command line. Networking is not provided, however. No Login, no ping from a DOSBox. It isn't there. Perhaps there is a trick I missed. If so, let me know.

THX to all
Bruce


0

Response Number 4
Name: Rimfire
Date: August 10, 2005 at 06:08:32 Pacific
Reply:

It might be prudent to mention that I too am a service tech. Although as I am located in a rural community, much of my work is not computer related.

In order to access the server, you will need to load the network settings so that the client's pc can join your network.

If you are concerned about the transfer time hard disk to hard disk have you considdered the amount of time and network traffic that is involved to transfer in the way you propose. I feel that it is much better to tie up one computer for ten minutes rather than an entire network for three quarters of an hour.


0

Response Number 5
Name: jboy
Date: August 10, 2005 at 08:46:01 Pacific
Reply:

Yeah, I've never really investigated it, but the 'Safe Mode Networking' is an iffy proposition for sure.

One thing you might try is Knoppix - I was running a new machine from the CD for a few days, prior to even installing any HDDs. It picked up the (high speed) internet connection just fine, would've been a lifesaver if I'd encountered any driver problems from Windows (although I didn't)

Computers in the future may have only 1,000 vacuum tubes and perhaps only weigh 1 1/2 tons.


- Popular Mechanics, 1949


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: roamer_1
Date: August 12, 2005 at 16:20:29 Pacific
Reply:

Rimfire:

>>Rimfire wrote: "In order to access the server, you will need to load the network settings so that the client's pc can join your network."

Relatively easy to do with batch if dos drivers can be employed (just speculating..).

>>Rimfire wrote: "If you are concerned about the transfer time hard disk to hard disk have you considdered the amount of time and network traffic that is involved to transfer in the way you propose."

Yes, I know it is heavy on the network, but I can usually get two machines pushing to the server at once and still get surfing and reasonable single file transfers, printing etc across my local LAN.. I suppose I could sub-route that server and the repair workgroup and not effect my wider LAN at all..

This all started because I put in a pre-service bench to scan incoming boxes for viruses and to handle mundane transfers... The bench has 4 stations side-by-side working off of a KVM switch (one MON & KB).

I have been using a DOS/MINI98 CDROM of my own creation to boot to in each box to run AV and Diags from. While this works very well, it inevitably falls shy of what it COULD do...

If I was using the box's own reg I could easily clean the reg of spyware, bad keys & etc... Hence the thought of using safe mode rather than my MINI98 in some circumstances...

It would be AWESOME to be able to install Adaware, SpyBot, AV of choice, update em all, and run them right from safe mode...

As far as transfers go, I only have two testbenches and two guest benches (other than the four station pre-service bench I mentioned...)

They are always busy as can be doing the more intricate or hands-on stuff, most of which requires little network interaction anymore due to having already been on the pre-service bench.

That's why I built the pre-service bench in the first place... to take the load off of the test benches...

It really did increase my production by a TON as scanning and transfers are about the biggest bottlenecks on time that I have...

RGDS.
Bruce



0

Response Number 7
Name: roamer_1
Date: August 12, 2005 at 16:46:33 Pacific
Reply:

JBoy:

Ahh, Knoppix is a joy to have in the old kit bag. I do respect Linux, and I am not far from having a full time Linux server, but for a boot CD I still much prefer a MINI98 or BART disk.

AFAIK, Linux still has moderate trouble writing to NTFS. While super for file transfer, it is not as good for killing bugs.

I will probably always use DOS to diagnose hardware.

The mini98 booted from cd tends to be my favorite... boots quick, can exit the boot and go to DOS, Paragon NTFS drivers work great in the miniwin (r/w). It will often read things that an NT machine will not.

The BART is nice if on an NT box because of the ability to access the NT reg.

Knoppix has it's place, but I am afraid I am too long a DOS dog to be comfy on a bash line. Besides, all the slashes run the wrong way... it makes me dizzy... ;)

As I explained to Rimfire above: As good as a BootCD can be, it sure would be nice to be using the box's own reg when possible, which is why I am looking to use Safe Mode in this way. Automated boot to safe, Look for needed software, if not found install it, update it, auto-scan, auto-fix... ZOOM! Large file transfer to the server is just a plus.

Regds,
Bruce



0

Response Number 8
Name: Rimfire
Date: August 13, 2005 at 01:55:22 Pacific
Reply:

I think that I might be a little out of my depth here and one of my 'floaties' is going flat!

Depending on your programming skills, it might be better to write a routine that queries the registry and loads the installed drivers from the box's files. As I already hinted, this is beyond my skills.

If you get this working, be sure to make a version that will work with XP. I'd recon there would be quite a niche market for that.


0

Response Number 9
Name: roamer_1
Date: August 13, 2005 at 11:42:55 Pacific
Reply:

Rimfire,

XP= Yuk. Unlikely too, as I doubt XP would allow the DOS drivers... I can fix NT all day long, but I much prefer WIN98... or even WIN3x over their NT cousins.

It is probably an insult to Programmers to use the term "programming skill" when talking about me, but I am pretty good with a batch.

I think I will give it a whirl. Thx for the chat.

Bruce


0

Response Number 10
Name: roamer_1
Date: August 14, 2005 at 18:02:14 Pacific
Reply:

FWIW: It won't work, at least not with MS Net Client 3.0.

The DOS networking requires a different ifshlp.sys (won't work with the win9x version. So Safe Mode cannot be attained :(


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows 95/98 Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Safe Mode CD-Rom and Networking...

This is driving me crazy??????? cd-rom and D.C.M. www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/this-is-driving-me-crazy-cdrom-and-dcm/24896.html

CD-Rom AND CD-RW Problems www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/cdrom-and-cdrw-problems/73255.html

CD Rom and IDE controller problem www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/cd-rom-and-ide-controller-problem/122839.html