Computing.Net > Forums > Windows 95/98 > Master Slave and Ribbons

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Master Slave and Ribbons

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Bryco
Date: February 20, 2003 at 18:27:18 Pacific
OS: Win98FE
CPU/Ram: 800mhz/384mb
Comment:

I have two hard drives and a CD/DVD player presently.

Primary Master: Hard drive - 12gb
Primary Slave : DVD 12x
Secondary Master: Hard drive - 20gb

Actually note sure if DVD is on Primary or Secondary (Is there a way to check without removing the case cover?)

I am wanting to connect a CDR/RW drive. 52x24x52

In the past it was my understanding that it was best to have the two hard drives on the separate ribbons as I now have them.

Now, the documentation for the CR/RW says to have the drives on the PriMaster and PriSlave and then have the DVD as SecMaster and CD/RW as SecSlave.

Can anyone offer info to the correct way to set this up? Please share opinions and/or knowledge.

I searched this site but only found a couple of older responses.

Thanks,
Bryan



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: jer...
Date: February 20, 2003 at 18:37:41 Pacific
Reply:

If you watch as the machine boots it might be visible to see it say Primary Master = HD, Primary Slave = CD, Secondary Master = HD, Secondary Slave = CD or some such.

I would go with that sort of setup.


0

Response Number 2
Name: Bryco
Date: February 20, 2003 at 19:22:36 Pacific
Reply:

jer...
You were correct, thank you.

I found:
Pri. Master Disk : LBA, UDMA, 2, 12+gb
Pri. Slave Disk : None
Sec. Master Disk : LBA, UDMA, 2, 20+gb
Sec. Slave Disk : CDROM, UDMA, 2

The CDRW's Manual (BusLink 52XCD-RW Drive) is suggesting the following:
Pri. Master Disk : LBA, UDMA, 2, 12+gb
Pri. Slave Disk : LBA, UDMA, 2, 20+gb
Sec. Master Disk : CDROM, UDMA, 2
Sec. Slave Disk : CDRW...

Does anyone/everyone agree that this would be the best setup?

Bryan


0

Response Number 3
Name: papa2
Date: February 20, 2003 at 20:15:30 Pacific
Reply:

It all depends on what you do most. Having the hard drives on the same channel slows down HD to HD copies. Having the CD drives on the same channel slows down CD to CD copies.


0

Response Number 4
Name: ding
Date: February 21, 2003 at 02:47:03 Pacific
Reply:

my burner documentation proved to be totally wrong in advising the configuration. If you use Nero burning software, it will do a search and give an error message if the drives and disks are attached the wrong way. So don't rely on the manual...

my situation: two hard disk connected to primary, cdrom and cdrom burner connected to secundary runs without problem and without remarks from Nero


0

Response Number 5
Name: mesich
Date: February 21, 2003 at 04:55:07 Pacific
Reply:

Hi Bryco,

I have many set up just as Ding.

Hard drives on the Primary and others on the Secondary.

Mesich


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: possum
Date: February 21, 2003 at 13:51:07 Pacific
Reply:

If you have two devices of different speeds on one IDE channel both devices will run at the speed of the slower device, so you should have the hard drives on the primary channel and CD drives on the secondary.


0

Response Number 7
Name: mesich
Date: February 21, 2003 at 14:49:37 Pacific
Reply:

Hi Possum,

I agree with you on the setup and that two devices connected on the same IDE will only run at the speed of the slower device, however this is only true if you are using both of the devices at the same time.

For example: If I have a hard drive that is ATA 66 and another that is ATA 100 the limitation is only when copying files and such from one hard drive to the other. In other words both drives are being used at the same time.

If the ATA100 is the Master then it is not limited in speed by the the slower drive when performing task in which the slower drive is not being used.

Mesich


0

Response Number 8
Name: Bryco
Date: February 21, 2003 at 21:46:40 Pacific
Reply:

Then that is what I will do.
2 HD on Primary and the CD-ROM as Sec.Master with the CR-RW as Sec. Slave.
Thank you.

Mesich I am glad you mentioned the ATA factors.

I bought and returned the 40gb HD because it would not work on my machine due to the 32gb limit and my particular BIOS (Award 4.51) but I also noted that it was ATA133.

If I did not have the 32gb limit would this ATA133 work on my machine but just not at the ATA133 rate. I realize that I could get an ATA adapter card to use it at the 133 but again not feasable per Intel for the 440bx chipset I am running on a Biostar M6TBA MOBO.

I ask becasue I can find a 30gb ATA133 Maxtor.

Will it work if I simply install it?

Bryan


0

Response Number 9
Name: mesich
Date: February 22, 2003 at 11:56:29 Pacific
Reply:

Hi Bryco,

Sorry it took so long to respond. My high speed internet connection is down and I just go the old dial-up 56K modem going.

Simply, yes you can just hook up the ATA 133
hard drive to your computer.

It will run at the speed of the ATA 100.

Take Care,
Mesich


0

Response Number 10
Name: Bryco
Date: February 23, 2003 at 09:56:05 Pacific
Reply:

ATA = Advanced Technology Attachment.

ATA rate is determined by the motherboard.

How can I tell what ATA rating my PC is using or set at?

I have completed the successful installation of the CD-RW device.
It was quite the process as I performed it.
I used Partition Magic and Norton Ghost along with a lot of WinME Defrag.

My 20GB HD is now C: and E: as Master at ~10GB each requiring a change in cluster size from 4kb to 8kb (on all partitions). I had to merge and then reallocate the free space on each.
My 13GB HD is now D: and F: as Slave on the Primary controller.

My CD-RW is Master and the CD-ROM is Slave on the Secondary controller.

Through this process I have had to read every manual involving my PC. In none of them did I see any mention of the ATA numbers involved with each or any of these devices or motherboard. Nor can I difinitively determine if I have an AT or ATX case.

It there a direct association between UDMA and ATA?
I believe the original 13GB hard drive is UDMA33 whereas the 20GB is definately Ultra ATA 100 (It says so on the box).

The M6TBA System Board manual states: "The mainboard, a Pentium II micro-processor based PC/ATX system..."

Under Features:
- Supports 33MHZ PCI bus speed
- Supports 66MHZ / 133MHZ AGP Bus

Under PCI Enhanced IDE Built-in On Board:
- Supports four IDE hard disk drives
- Supports Ultra DMA/33, Bus Master Mode
- Supports high capacity hard disk drives
- Supports LBA mode

Under Dimensions(ATX form-factor)
- 30.5 cm X 20 cm

So after reading the exerpted info above I suspect it is saying that it is ATA33 but will support ATA133.

ATX - It powers off by itself after going to Start, Shutdown, Shutdown so I suspect it is ATX and not AT.

Am I even close to being correct?

Thanks for staying with me on this.
Bryan


0

Response Number 11
Name: mesich
Date: February 23, 2003 at 10:26:32 Pacific
Reply:

Just wanted to let you know I am still following the post. I have just downloaded the manual for your motherboard and will post back after checking it out.

Mesich


0

Response Number 12
Name: mesich
Date: February 23, 2003 at 11:04:21 Pacific
Reply:

Hi Bryan,

Enter you bios setup.

Select the Integrated Peripherals Setup Menu.

You will see 8 settings for PIO and DMA for the different Primary and Secondary IDEs.

Ensure all of them are set to Auto.

Save the changes and exit.

After Windows loads restart the computer.

When you see the Bios Configuration Screen during the boot press the Pause Key.

Look for your hard drives. This will show whether the drives are using PIO Mode or DMA Mode

It will list one of the following:
PIO 0
PIO 1
PIO 2
PIO 3
PIO 4
DMA 0
DMA 1
DMA 2

It should also show whether it is ATA 33, 66, 100 or 133.

Post back with the info.

Take Care,
Mesich


0

Response Number 13
Name: Bryco
Date: February 23, 2003 at 16:44:20 Pacific
Reply:

"You will see 8 settings for PIO and DMA for the different Primary and Secondary IDEs.

Ensure all of them are set to Auto."

They are all set to Auto.

"Look for your hard drives. This will show whether the drives are using PIO Mode or DMA Mode "

It does not show this information. I thought perhaps the info is above the visible screen area so I used TweakUI to bypass the Windows Welcome screen and the info is not displayed anywhere that I can see.

Bryan


0

Response Number 14
Name: mesich
Date: February 23, 2003 at 18:22:57 Pacific
Reply:

Hi again Bryan,

To answer your questions in response #10.

Your board is ATX.

You bios supports UDMA33.

Your PCI slots will support up to a 33Mhz bus speed. Expansion slots for your modems, Nics ect...

The AGP slot for your Video if used will support 133Mhz bus speed.

Since you have set all the DMA and PIO settings to Auto in the bios is should, most of the time does, detect the best settings for the hardware connected to the IDEs.

Try doing a Benchmark on your computer from
PC Pitstop and see what it says about the hard drive speeds.

PC PitStop

Post back.

Mesich


0

Response Number 15
Name: Bryco
Date: February 23, 2003 at 20:21:59 Pacific
Reply:

I did not see a specific 'Benchmark test' but I ran the 'Full Test'

Here are the results although the formatting to this post is not so friendly:

Overall: This is a fast system that should meet all your computing needs.

Subsystem Description Performance Configuration
System Intel Pentium III, 800MHz
Memory 384MB RAM
Disk Drives C, D, E, F
Video Intel740 Win9x PV4.0 with Video Capture

Internet MSIE 6.0; T312461
Windows Windows 98
Security
Your Score:
355
There were no tips for anything but Security because I am not using Restricted Zones in Outlook or IE,


For the Disks I got:
Disk Drive Letters


These are drive letters associated with hard disk drives. This list does not include drive letters for floppy disks or other removable media such as CD-ROM, DVD, Zip or Jaz drives.

Description Drive C Drive D Drive E Drive F
Partition format FAT32 FAT32 FAT32 FAT32
Cluster size 8 KB 8 KB 8 KB 8 KB
Drive label PC-S875 BGFT1ST MAX 2ND BGFT2ND
Size 9756 MB 6120 MB 9756 MB 6104 MB
Free space 4854 MB (50%) 6013 MB (98%) 4801 MB (49%) 5371 MB (88%)
Drive health OK OK OK OK
Last scan Sat Feb 22 2003 Sat Feb 22 2003 Sat Feb 22 2003 Sat Feb 22 2003
Data fragmentation 2% 0% 0% 0%
File fragmentation 0% 0% 0% 0%
Last defrag Sat Feb 22 2003 Sat Feb 22 2003 Sat Feb 22 2003 Sat Feb 22 2003
Junk files 1 MB (0%) 0 MB (0%) 0 MB (0%) 0 MB (0%)

Cached speed 125.84 MB/s (95%) 129.06 MB/s (97%) 128.17 MB/s (96%) 130.01 MB/s (98%)

Uncached speed 5.1 MB/s (142%) 2.6 MB/s (73%) 3.93 MB/s (110%) 2.66 MB/s (74%)

Drives C: and E: are the newer ATA100 and D: and F: are the older UDMA33 drive.

There was no mention anywhere about ATA factors. I looked at everypage.

Bryan


0

Response Number 16
Name: mesich
Date: February 23, 2003 at 21:48:35 Pacific
Reply:

Your bios has made the correct settings for your hard drive.

Notice the speeds you listed for cached:
C:125.84 MB/s (95%) New Drive
D:129.06 MB/s (97%) Old Drive
E:128.17 MB/s (96%) New Drive
F:130.01 MB/s (98%) Old Drive

I'm sure you have already noticed the difference is not much between the new and the old drive.

Now lets look at the uncached speeds:
5.1 MB/s (142%) New Drive
2.6 MB/s (73%) Old Drive
3.93 MB/s (110%) New Drive
2.66 MB/s (74%) Old Drive

About twice the transfer rate of your old drive which shows the bios has setup the drive correctly.

Your Primary Master is actually 142% faster than that of others with the same type of computer you are using. That doesn't surprise me much as I am well aware of your vast knowlege and know you perform the many tasks in keeping the computer "cleaned up".

It looks as though the bios has set the old hard drive as PIO-0 which the fastest data rate is 3.3Mb/sec and set the new drive as PIO-1 in which the fastest data rate is 5.2Mb/sec.

The bios probably doesn't support PIO-3 or PIO-4. You could change this by flashing the bios. I DON'T recommend this as you are probably running quite well as it is.

Another nice little tweak is to Enable DMA in the Device Manager for your New hard drive. You new hard drive will support it but I am not sure on your older drive so I wouldn't try it with that one.

Run PC Pitstop again after doing such and see the difference in transfer rate. Most see the difference in just starting up the computer and opening applications.

Mesich


0

Response Number 17
Name: Bryco
Date: February 24, 2003 at 17:33:42 Pacific
Reply:

Mesich,
Thank you again as usual. I truely appreciate your valuable input.

Both drives remain with the DMA selected in Device Manager.

What is your confidence level that a 30gb ATA133 drive will work as good as the drives I have now? If it will work I want to get one even if I do not install it now. I would like to get one before they are no longer available.

The one at Staples that is available is a 7200 rpm drive. The two I have now are both 5400 rpm.

What do you think? Go for it?

Bryan


0

Response Number 18
Name: mesich
Date: February 25, 2003 at 05:19:52 Pacific
Reply:

Hi Bryan,

It will work fine. I would go ahead and get it. I've built computers for people who do not have much money and searched for some 10Gb hard drives trying to save them a few nickels. Cannot get them locally anymore.
I wish I would have bought a closet full while they were still available at a resonable price. I as you believe the 30Gb drives are headed in the same direction. Get it while you can and at a good price.

Take Care,
Mesich


0

Response Number 19
Name: Bryco
Date: February 25, 2003 at 16:16:02 Pacific
Reply:

Mesich,

Thank you very much.

Bryan


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows 95/98 Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Master Slave and Ribbons

ATA 100 master/slave question www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/ata-100-masterslave-question/111280.html

WD HD Master/Slave www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/wd-hd-masterslave/147221.html

master/slave www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/masterslave/49352.html