Computing.Net > Forums > Windows 95/98 > IDE vs. EIDE vs. SCSI

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

IDE vs. EIDE vs. SCSI

Reply to Message Icon

Name: remedy7
Date: February 17, 2001 at 14:08:09 Pacific
Comment:

Help!!! I just bought a computer with 2 IDE ports
and I'd like to add a CD-RW. What is the
difference between IDE, EIDE, and SCSI?
Basically, am I limited to buying an IDE drive
for this system?



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: BuggeralL
Date: February 17, 2001 at 14:46:20 Pacific
Reply:

i'd recommend you stick to IDE it's the easiest to work with :)


EIDE Enhanced Integrated Drive Electronics
IDE Integrated Drive Electronics
SCSI Small Computer System Interface aka (System Can't See It :)


0

Response Number 2
Name:
Date: February 17, 2001 at 15:32:26 Pacific
Reply:

I agree! Stick with IDE. Scsi is much more expensive and only needed by power users.


0

Response Number 3
Name: DAVEINCAPS
Date: February 17, 2001 at 15:42:56 Pacific
Reply:

Originally IDE was limited to 1024 cylinders on the hard drive. EIDE, among other things, removed that limitation. Nowadays IDE and EIDE mean the same thing. Unless your computer has an on-board SCSI connector or card avoid it.


0

Response Number 4
Name: doug
Date: February 17, 2001 at 22:37:52 Pacific
Reply:

ok - here's the scoop-- if your computer is new - yo have EIDE which supports HD's over 2 gig's ( the Old computers had IDE - supporting up to 2 gig drives and most mfg's continue to use the terms IDE but really mean EIDE -- now SCSI - if you are going to copy CD's whether Audio or Data (i.e. games) you REQUIRE scsi as EIDE(IDE) CDR drives cannot support Diskcopying - SCSI is also much more reliable - If your not going to copy CD's then EIDE is fine - Adaptec's CDCOPIER which womes with their Adaptec 3.x & 4.x software does not support anything but scsi CDR/w drives


0

Response Number 5
Name: DAVEINCAPS
Date: February 17, 2001 at 22:57:25 Pacific
Reply:

Ignore Doug's "scoop". Adaptec's CDcopier works just fine on my IDE burner. I copy cd to cd (from a second IDE cd rom) and music. You don't need SCSI to do any of that.


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: AZZ1
Date: February 18, 2001 at 07:44:38 Pacific
Reply:

DAVENINCAPS is right. I use the same software with mt ide cdrw. no problem.


0

Response Number 7
Name: chappie
Date: February 18, 2001 at 09:23:48 Pacific
Reply:

the IDE cd-rom and IDE burners will now do every thing that SCSI can do - and with the price difference - go with IDE.
The main advantage of scsi used to be that they were capable of higher data transfer rates, so you had fewer buffer under-runs


0

Response Number 8
Name: ajay
Date: February 20, 2001 at 23:28:51 Pacific
Reply:

go daveincaps, doug's statement is completely false


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows 95/98 Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: IDE vs. EIDE vs. SCSI

IDE RAID vs SCSI www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/ide-raid-vs-scsi/11941.html

CD-RW -- EIDE or SCSI? www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/cdrw-eide-or-scsi/11551.html

EIDE vs. SCSI hard drive www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/eide-vs-scsi-hard-drive/49293.html