Computing.Net > Forums > Windows 95/98 > 98 install cannot read C: on reboot

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

98 install cannot read C: on reboot

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Brett Walker
Date: December 8, 1998 at 23:17:16 Pacific
Comment:

Trying to build a Christmas gift for kids and having trouble. Please assist if possible.

Built machine w/ AMD K6 chip. After installing W98 it reboots and then freezes up not able to access the C drive. After awhile it says, "While initializing device SHELL: Could not find or load KRNL386.exe." Then after a few minutes I get the error about accessing the C drive.

Using a PC100 Mainboard Super Socket 7 #M590 w/ a AMD K6 3D - 300 Mhz chip and have tried 1 Western Digital 5.1 Gig drives. Getting the same error in the same place during the install.

HELP me Please.
Brett



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: milleneum
Date: December 8, 1998 at 23:47:19 Pacific
Reply:

Here is a suggestion. Try a different CPU, preferably an Intel. A long shot but if you have another CPU you can test with, at least you can eliminate if it is a bad CPU causing the problem.

Make double sure that all BIOS settings are correct. Set the BIOS settings to run at the default settings if that option is available.

It sure sounds like a missing file however. Maybe try a fresh reinstall of Win98 if you haven't already.


0

Response Number 2
Name: lee
Date: December 9, 1998 at 07:11:21 Pacific
Reply:

First check the CMOS setup for your hard drive. If possible use auto-detection. Then boot the system with a bootable floppy disk made from win98. Fdisk then format HD before installing 98.


0

Response Number 3
Name: Marc Lattemann
Date: July 1, 1999 at 07:29:03 Pacific
Reply:

I got the same problem with the same Board (M590) and the AMDK6-350. THis Board is realy bugy, i think. Since i put the new cpu on the socket !nothing! runs propably and many, many error occure. I don't know what to do...i leeched the new Bios-Update from www.pcchips.com but more problems came on me. Is there another fix?!


0

Response Number 4
Name: David Thibeault
Date: July 26, 1999 at 20:32:07 Pacific
Reply:

Try disabeling the external cache in the Bios setup.


0

Response Number 5
Name: Kevin Johns
Date: September 3, 1999 at 05:20:22 Pacific
Reply:

I have the same board with an AMD K6-2/350, and solved these problems by reducing the bus speed to 66MHZ. This means running the CPU at 333MHZ, but solves the crashing in WIN98. Before doing this I could not even get WIN98 to do a complete install without crashing! I have sent an E-mail to PCChips on this matter, several weeks ago, but have not yet received a reply. Will post another message if and when I get more info.


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: Tom
Date: November 1, 1999 at 09:01:23 Pacific
Reply:

I have a pc100 m590 and have tried tirelessly running it at 100mhz, 83, mhz and 66mhz etc...basically this motherboard is good but I "heard someone say" that pc100 overspecified the speeds it could reliably run at. even trying different drivers etc this board does not want to run above 333mhz at whatever bus speed reliably. In fact I dont think this is a good board at all. I am in the process of setting up a website of all the things you could do to a m590 to pay it back for mountainous frustration and some extreemly long nights. I hate this board more than I have hated anything or anyone in my life and I should be able to make the damn thin work as I have worked on pc's and in hardware support for 3 years...Tell your friends tell everyone you know this board is a direct attempt by Satan to introduce more hatred and upstet into the world...please comment....ujamaflip@hotmail.com


0

Response Number 7
Name: John
Date: February 7, 2000 at 23:02:04 Pacific
Reply:

I couldn't have said it better myself, it's a *&%$# board that drives you crazy with crashes every hour or so and sends my phone bills and blood pressure through the roof, and all the garentees on the board were worthless in getting it fixed or your money back. You know, it's the softwares fault. Only my board is a n M577 with an IBM cyrix base when it was supposed to be a celleron. Carpetbaggers return.


0

Response Number 8
Name: Tom
Date: February 23, 2000 at 10:04:39 Pacific
Reply:

one of those funny things in life sent to test us I think. Since I have been running a pc100 m590 with a k6-2 400 for over a year now including ....189 crashes I consider myself experienced and versed in m590 speak....it's KAK !!!!!!!!!!!!!! however this will make a reader smile. I overclocked it on the 75mhz bus setting and 5.5x with 2.4v core and it runs delightfully with far fewer crashes.. I'm still going to get a dual Abit though asap.....


0

Response Number 9
Name: Gary
Date: June 24, 2000 at 17:31:27 Pacific
Reply:

I found this on a search for BIOS info on the pcchips m577, as I was wondering if I could use a faster k6-2 chip with this motherboard. I know that the CPU voltage has to be set up right when clocking the bus and multipliers, or it will result in crashes or unstable activity. The K6-2's run at 2.2v from about 266 mhz up to the 400's, then goes up to 2.4v for the 450's and 475's, then back down to 2.2 for the 500's and 533's, then up to 2.3 for the 550's. If the voltage is set too high or too low, it will result in system crashes, errors, and/or won't boot. All kinds of crazy things can and will happen. Also, make sure your system has adequate case/cpu cooling, since the computer will crash or run unstable if it gets too hot (but might run fine for a while until it overheats). Another thing is that the drivers for the m577 are for windows 95, and there's an issue with the IDE channels not working unless there's two IDE devices on the same channel, i.e., a master/slave setup such as the HD and cdrom being on the same cable. It won't boot up at all if you just have the HD on one and the cdrom on the other. Crazy, but that's the way it works.

Hope this helps.


0

Response Number 10
Name: Mac
Date: July 30, 2000 at 10:58:19 Pacific
Reply:

hello I have a Pc100 mainboard version m598 and I have to say that things are not getting better. I can install win98 and have done so many times. The problem is when it finishes it always comes up with a register problem. I have tried different power supplies different versions, windows, cpu's, ram you name it. If anyone have a solution please e-mail me at d_macd@hotmail.com.


0

Response Number 11
Name: EB
Date: August 13, 2000 at 20:44:33 Pacific
Reply:

I have had the PCChips M590 since last August. Perhaps I was lucky but I can count the number of times this thing has crashed on one hand, most of which were when trying to pull off my overclock. First thing I did after getting the board was get the December 1998 BIOS release for it. The version of this board I have has the 8MB onboard AGP video. After that I immediately set it to 90x5 on my K6-2 400, a 50mhz overclock. That worked fine, and I installed Win98 without hassle. For RAM at the time I have 48MB of generic PC100 SDRAM, currently I have 256MB both of which are Siemens PC100 DIMMs. In January I decided to clock it at 495mhz 90x5.5. I had a few crashes doing this until I upped the CPU voltage to 2.7 volts. I cannot see any one component that would cause any unstability in the board that I would recommend anyone avoid, my guess would be to use good RAM and remember the 100mhz setting of the M590 is actually 90mhz, so set your multipliers accordingly to achieve the proper speed for the CPU.


0

Response Number 12
Name: Niek
Date: October 17, 2000 at 19:09:42 Pacific
Reply:

Similar problem. I installed an AMD k6-2-550mhz (in a Windows ME environment). Clock speed 100 mhz and multiplier of 5.5. This resulted in continuous crashes. Once I reduced the mutliplier to 5, with the resulting 500 Mhz, all was fine. This may also be because the voltage is then closer to what AMD specifies: AMD specieis 2.3V for the 550Mhz cpu, with a lower and upper limit of 2.2 and 2.4V respectively. AMD only allows you to run the board at 2.2V - the lower setting. There is no 2.4V setting and that may eb the reason as well why the cpu and board get out of sync. I have had this problem before with motherboards outfitted at their maximum specs (e.g. fastest combination of bus speed and multiplier).Of course I paid for a 550 Mhz cpu, not for a 500 Mhz, and I expected to get the 550 Mhz improvement. Then agian, a 500 Mhz might have to be installed at 400 Mhz, who knows?


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows 95/98 Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: 98 install cannot read C: on reboot

Windows 98 installation problems www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/windows-98-installation-problems/161320.html

Windows 98 install difficulties www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/windows-98-install-difficulties/168903.html

Tools to fix Sector reading error on C:\ www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/tools-to-fix-sector-reading-error-on-c/115347.html