Computing.Net > Forums > Windows 95/98 > 638k Conventional Memory, NO VIRUS?

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

638k Conventional Memory, NO VIRUS?

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Weird Al Jr
Date: November 13, 2002 at 15:06:27 Pacific
OS: DOS/95/98/ALL
CPU/Ram: ANY Dosen't matter.
Comment:

I am a tech, I see alot of customer computers daily, and yet again I have another one that has only 638k of total conventional memory. Im sure you all know all IBM compatable systems should have 640k total conventional memory. Most of the time a virus will cause a system to show up at 636 or 638k total memory, because they hide in that top few kilobytes of memory. In my cases no viruses could be present, the system even reports 638k with no hard drive attatched and booting off a clean write protected floppy disk. I have had this problem multiple times with many systems, can anyone recommend a solution for me or a possible reason the other 2k is missing. Please any reasonable info will be appreciated. Thanks.



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: DAVEINCAPS
Date: November 13, 2002 at 20:09:16 Pacific
Reply:

It's only reporting 638 during post or the OS is reporting 638 total, as in the MEM command? I assume you've tried swapping the memory.

I've seen older systems report less that 640 on post. I assumed it was because that memory was being cached or reserved for something and wasn't being reported.

It could also be a flaw in the bios similar to the way the cpu speed is sometimes reported wrong in the post process. I remember some old MBs that would show 125 mhz for a 133 cpu.


0

Response Number 2
Name: vtech
Date: November 13, 2002 at 22:22:05 Pacific
Reply:

638k is very good. Check the autoexec/config.sys for items.
Some can be remarked LH load high.
There is nothing to worry about 638K


0

Response Number 3
Name: Weird Al Jr
Date: November 13, 2002 at 23:26:43 Pacific
Reply:

DAVEINCAPS: I hear what your saying, but it is reported by the OS, mem in particular, but other memory utilities such as chkdsk will also report the same missing memory.

vtech: thanks for trying, but you misunderstand... you are thinking of free memory not total memory. All systems should have 640k total memory not free memory. Programs loading in config.sys & autoexec.bat will lowwer your free memory amount, but can't effect your total memory.

Keep em comming guys... :) and thanks.


0

Response Number 4
Name: DAVEINCAPS
Date: November 14, 2002 at 00:40:00 Pacific
Reply:

In some older systems you could change the conventional memory in cmos down to 512. Of course that's not what's wrong since 638 wasn't an option. But I have to think it's in cmos somewhere. Did you try loading bios defaults or changing any memory options?


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Related Posts

See More







Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows 95/98 Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: 638k Conventional Memory, NO VIRUS?

Conventional Memory Problem Win98SE www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/conventional-memory-problem-win98se/100783.html

Nogt enough conventional memory... www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/nogt-enough-conventional-memory/162283.html

Another conventional memory snag www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/another-conventional-memory-snag/168169.html