Computing.Net > Forums > Windows 3.1 > Running Win 3.x on DOSBox

Running Win 3.x on DOSBox

Reply to Message Icon

Original Message
Name: Mr, X (by Robin86)
Date: April 17, 2007 at 14:58:19 Pacific
Subject: Running Win 3.x on DOSBox
OS: Windows Vista Home Premiu
CPU/Ram: Athlon 64, 2GB RAM
Comment:

Hi,

I don't have a problem, but rather a tip for people who for some reason wants to run Windows 3.x.

I've tried using Virtual PC for running 3.x but in my experience there are a lot of issues when running applications on 3.x on VPC.

Then I happened to find a program called DOSBox when I was looking for a way to play DOS games on Vista.
So I looked in the official forums for that app to see if the games I wanted to play were supported and I stumbled upon a thread with instructions on how to run Win 3.x on DOSBox, which actually emulates a 386 and not just virtualizes your current CPU like VPC.
So I gave it a shot and installed it and it's much more stable now than on VPC and none of the issues I had with 3.x on VPC are there now.
It works flawlessly.

There are even high color graphics drivers and sound drivers available.
There is no network card emulated though but it says there will be in the future.

Here's DOSBox:
http://dosbox.sourceforge.net/downl...

And here's the Win 3.x tread:
http://vogons.zetafleet.com/viewtop...

Links to all the drivers are in the thread too.


Report Offensive Message For Removal

Response Number 1
Name: rkix
Date: April 19, 2007 at 17:25:19 Pacific
Subject: Running Win 3.x on DOSBox
Reply: (edit)

I wouldn't know why you had so many problems with VPC+Win31 though. I got everything to work under VPC with the exception of the network.

But nonetheless, that is cool and you can do a lot of useful stuff with it (Civilization II and Ski-Free, anyone).

I never used Dosbox though, but the fact that Windows 3.1 runs under it is interesting. There is a howto somewhere on the internet where you can install Win31 under QEMU with Sound Blaster support and 256 color support via Cirrus Logic drivers (I played Civilization II under it).

Your having more luck with Dosbox with Windows 3.1 than I'm having with the Ubuntu net upgrade right now, but that's a whole different story in itself.

Happy Computing =-)


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 2
Name: Intel 80486 (by meisinscotland)
Date: April 20, 2007 at 03:52:16 Pacific
Subject: Running Win 3.x on DOSBox
Reply: (edit)

You must have...
seen this, surely...

http://computing.net/windows31/wwwb...

I made that =]

and since then I run Windows XP With VPC (on the same machine, no problem) and am currently awaiting a RAM upgrade =]


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 3
Name: BobSongs
Date: May 20, 2007 at 20:44:44 Pacific
Subject: Running Win 3.x on DOSBox
Reply: (edit)

It's cool to see the interest in Windows 3.1 is still going! Wow. I mean: it's an O/S from 1991. 15 years.

Don't get me wrong: I have it on a bootable CD. Along with a CD with Win95, 98 and Me.

But I never thought I'd see the mention of the word Ubuntu in a Windows 3.1 thread. rkix, don't forget Ubuntu Forums for help with that.

No license agreement issues!


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal







Use following form to reply to current message:

   Name: From My Computing.Net Settings
 E-Mail: From My Computing.Net Settings

Subject: Running Win 3.x on DOSBox

Comments:

 


  Homepage URL (*): 
Homepage Title (*): 
         Image URL: 
 
Data Recovery Software