Specialty Forums
Security and Virus
General Hardware
CPUs/Overclocking
Networking
Digital Photo/Video
Office Software
PC Gaming
Console Gaming
Programming
Database
Web Development
Digital Home

General Forums
Windows XP
Windows Vista
Windows 95/98
Windows Me
Windows NT
Windows 2000
Win Server 2008
Win Server 2003
Windows 3.1
Linux
PDAs
BeOS
Novell Netware
OpenVMS
Solaris
Disk Op. System
Unix
Mac
OS/2

Drivers
Driver Scan
Driver Forum

Software
Automatic Updates

BIOS Updates

My Computing.Net

Solution Center

Free IT eBook

Howtos

Site Search

Message Find

RSS Feeds

Install Guides

Data Recovery

About

Home
Reply to Message Icon Go to Main Page Icon

having 3.x shell in NT 5.x

Original Message
Name: pikachu
Date: March 19, 2005 at 11:21:31 Pacific
Subject: having 3.x shell in NT 5.x
OS: Server 2003
CPU/Ram: P3 1.4/512mb pc 100
Comment:
Is there anyway of getting the old shell onto Windows XP or Server 2003? I would like it so when I minimize a window it will become an icon. Thanks!

Program Manager you say? Lose the IE shell and become secure with Program Manager!


Report Offensive Message For Removal


Response Number 1
Name: rogerashley
Date: March 19, 2005 at 11:30:02 Pacific
Subject: having 3.x shell in NT 5.x
Reply: (edit)
NT5 what has this got to do with W3 ???
they are ten years apart..........



Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 2
Name: pikachu
Date: March 19, 2005 at 12:18:11 Pacific
Subject: having 3.x shell in NT 5.x
Reply: (edit)
Well, people who know a lot about 3.x would know a lot about its fetaures, no? So, posting a question abotu a 3.x interface on diffrent windows platforms would know about this. So, a question like this would be best geared towards the 3.x boards ;-)

Program Manager you say? Lose the IE shell and become secure with Program Manager!



Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 3
Name: rogerashley
Date: March 19, 2005 at 13:05:01 Pacific
Subject: having 3.x shell in NT 5.x
Reply: (edit)
Window 3 is a GUI on top of MS DOS O/S, NT is
based on OS/2 which is a intregrated O/S
therefore it would take a developer who
understands NT to be able to use W3 GUI.

This is the same as asking Virtual PC run
on Windows XP questions here, no relevence.

YOUR O/S IS THE NT FAMILY AND THESE FORUMS HAVE SEPERATE
O/S FORUMS FOR THEIR RELATED QUESTIONS

TRY THE MAC FORUM???



Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 4
Name: jboy
Date: March 19, 2005 at 13:31:24 Pacific
Subject: having 3.x shell in NT 5.x
Reply: (edit)
Yeah, "Sabrina" (or is it "Pikachu"?) that's pretty flawed thinking, to say the least.

Thank you for further diluting the ever thinning gruel that this particular forum has become. By comparison, the DOS forum is a veritable beehive of activity (and WinME seems populated by scholars)

Questions even remotely concerned with Win3x here are rare indeed - most of those turn out to be DOS or hardware problems, or else could be answered in 5 seconds using Google.


Give me ambiguity or give me something else


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 5
Name: Sandman
Date: March 22, 2005 at 10:59:46 Pacific
Subject: having 3.x shell in NT 5.x
Reply: (edit)
Progman is still included with Xp & WinS2k3 so try running Program from the run box. On some machines this will open Progman and on others it will open an explorer window. I don't know why it acts this way but if it opens progman your good to go. You just need to change one registy key to set progman as your shell.

To change the shell to progman open regedit and navigate to
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon
change explorer.exe to progman.exe then reboot. You should now have WinNT looking more like Win3 :)

Hope this helps,
Sandman


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal


Response Number 6
Name: Glitchman
Date: March 22, 2005 at 14:28:57 Pacific
Subject: having 3.x shell in NT 5.x
Reply: (edit)
Bear in mind as you do this that XP may not have winfile.exe (File Manager) included, although progman.exe does exist, oddly enough. You will want to copy winfile.exe and winfile.hlp from a previous version of NT (preferably NT 4, maybe 3.51) if you want a functioning File Manager capable of handling long file names. I do NOT recommend using File Manager from Windows 3.x / 9x as they do not natively handle long file names (and could cause other issues!)

Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 7
Name: pikachu
Date: March 23, 2005 at 20:58:01 Pacific
Subject: having 3.x shell in NT 5.x
Reply: (edit)
Thanks all for your help! Yes sandman, I've changed the dumb explorer into progman.exe, but the interesting thing is SP2 or Server 2k3 had Progman.exe disabled. I've did some reserach, but the only thing I got was a topic of a conference with the SP2 team and somebody asked to why they done this. They only said "This was a last minute change, when you double click on it this is suppost to happen". Well, with such an odd answer, this leaves you in the dust.

Glitchman I do have the file manager from NT4. You would need to obtain NT SP6a and extract the files within it. There is the offical file manager .exe which runs very smoothly.

But the only thing to make this 3.11 interface complete is the dang features where you minimize a window and it would turn into an icon.. X-( Also, when you explore for files within program, they come up with the more recent explorer when fidning a file.

Anywho, thanks are for the little chat and if you guys have any info about these issues please send me a eMail ro reply. Thanks!

Program Manager you say? Lose the IE shell and become secure with Program Manager!


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 8
Name: Hmmm
Date: April 1, 2005 at 23:05:52 Pacific
Subject: having 3.x shell in NT 5.x
Reply: (edit)
Apart from the blathering about Sabrina going somewhere else this has been an interesting thread. Also it's seems some expect google to reveal all. I'd be interested if you manage to get minimixed proggies as icons. Maybe it's as just a simple matter of replacing a DLL. your thoughts?

Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 9
Name: alexanrs
Date: April 24, 2005 at 08:55:14 Pacific
Subject: having 3.x shell in NT 5.x
Reply: (edit)
Have yoy ever tried to replace USER.EXE and USER32.DLL with WinNT 3.51 SP1 ones? it should do the trick. If some DLLs start complaining after this replace them too (the most likely to do such a thing is SHELL32.DLL, i think).
BACKUP FIRST!!!
* note: some dlls needs to be registered after been replaced (user32.dll don't, at least when i replaced my win98 with a winME one). If this is the case. Enter "regsvr32 file.dll" in the safe mode command prompt, replacing file.dll with the dll name, and then rebooting.

Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal



Use following form to reply to current message:

   Name: From My Computing.Net Settings
 E-Mail: From My Computing.Net Settings

Subject: having 3.x shell in NT 5.x

Comments:

 
  Homepage URL (*): 
Homepage Title (*): 
         Image URL: 
 


Data Recovery Software




My PC has been hijacked!

Lexmark 2600 Printer Issues

btk1w1 infected start here post

Unwanted message remians on screen

Slow boot time


The information on Computing.Net is the opinions of its users. Such opinions may not be accurate and they are to be used at your own risk. Computing.Net cannot verify the validity of the statements made on this site. Computing.Net and Computing.Net, LLC hereby disclaim all responsibility and liability for the content of Computing.Net and its accuracy.
PLEASE READ THE FULL DISCLAIMER AND LEGAL TERMS BY CLICKING HERE

All content ©1996-2007 Computing.Net, LLC