Computing.Net > Forums > Windows Server 2003 > windows 2003 server

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

windows 2003 server

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Barry Daniels
Date: October 8, 2003 at 08:02:16 Pacific
OS: windows 2003
CPU/Ram: 2 x p700
Comment:

i am planning to use a windows 2003 terminal server to run a acucorp acucobol application.
I will be connecting using thin client boxes, w95, w98, w2000 and XP machines.
Apart from having to buy CAL's are there any other issue's ?
I would stick to win2000 & citrix otherwise.




Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: Glen
Date: October 10, 2003 at 11:39:46 Pacific
Reply:

Windows 2000 and Citrix is certainly a good choice. Depending on your needs, Citrix might actually be a better answer.

Win2k3 will give you a few more options but not a lot. It will give you full color instead of just 256 colors for example but Citrix already gives you that in w2k.

As much as I like w2k3, if w2k and Citrix is working, you might consider staying there.


0
Reply to Message Icon

Related Posts

See More







Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows Server 2003 Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: windows 2003 server

Start the windows 2003 server www.computing.net/answers/windows-2003/start-the-windows-2003-server/3806.html

Windows 2003 Server and Windows XP www.computing.net/answers/windows-2003/windows-2003-server-and-windows-xp/180.html

Windows 2003 Server and JetAdmin www.computing.net/answers/windows-2003/windows-2003-server-and-jetadmin/4374.html