Tom's Guide | Tom's Hardware | Tom's Games
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Hello,
Forgive my low level of knowledge on Exchange etc.
I would need some suggestions or advice regarding installing potentially Exchange on a small network. Here are the facts.
Main office has about 25 users. All are for the moment on a POP mail server. They have a local server for filesharing etc they do not use AD. They just opened a bransch office with 3 users.They do not have a dedicated IT person, the IT is run by a non experienced office worker and they do really not want to hire one either, just for the initial installation but not for daily maininance.
Is really Exchange the best option for this setting? What is the Small Office Edition?
VERY thankful for ANY input.
Thanks!
Annie

You haven't mentioned what functionality they're looking for. Without that, it's impossible to know if Exchange is even necessary.
There is no Exchange "small office edition". There is a Windows 2003 Small Business Server. That is basically Windows 2003, Active Directory, and Exchange, and you also get SQL and ISA Server built in if you get the Premium version. This all runs on one server, and it is limited up to 75 users.
http://www.microsoft.com/WindowsSer...
"Enough, enough bowing down to disillusion!
Hats off & applause to rogues & evolution!
The ripple effect is too good not to mention.
If you’re not affected, you’re not paying attention!"

The main function is just to be a mail system to get all the mails stored on a central server instead of POP as they today store on the local PC. They already have other SW for calendar, scheduling and what not. Thanks.

I am in the same boat. But I want to go the other way. I have 40 exchange users I want to take off and put on POP3. I see no reason to invest $10,000 in a Server, Exchange, Server License, CALS, and administration. Nor do I know much about Exchange.
Right now, all our email goes threw a filter for SPAM and Virus protection that we pay for on each email.
Having someone like GoDaddy host 100 usable emails for $30/year including virus and SPAM protection seems like the better option.
This is $.30 per email per month VS about $10 per email per month to go with an exchange setup.
For backup, set each Client to archive to the server once a day.

Keep in mind there are other advantages to Exchange, such as leveraging Active Directory as a directory service if you already have it.
Other considerations could be possible industry regulation compliance, use of mobile devices for email, etc. Perhaps you need availability of intra-office messaging should internet connectivity go down, etc.
To throw another option out there, you can also have Exchange services provided to you just as godaddy can provide you plain old email. This is called Exchange Managed Services.
If you were going to run your own messaging server, I would highly recommend SBS2003, especially in light of gained functionality you get with Active Directory anyway, such as centralized account storage, single sign on, managing your other servers and desktops with Group Policy, etc. SBS2003 also is geared for non-IT to be able to easily accomplish common tasks such as managing accounts, etc.
But no, it's not cheap. Make sure you get someone competent to set it up properly with the right security precautions, such as antivirus/antispam for incoming email, etc.
"Enough, enough bowing down to disillusion!
Hats off & applause to rogues & evolution!
The ripple effect is too good not to mention.
If you’re not affected, you’re not paying attention!"

That said, the cost is a BIG factor. Also, to learn how to administer it is another. Installing Exchange alone is half the battle. Now dealing with mailboxes growing to big, policies, and dealing with recovery when something goes wrong, can be cumbersome.
If your not using all the calendar sharing, task lists sharing, and OWA. Then why using it for 40 and less emails?
Something like GoDaddy provides you with SPAM filters, Virus filters, webmail, remote administration, next to %100 uptimes, and somewhere for your email to go incase your personal web link goes down.
I admit, you can't administer all the mailboxes from one centralized exchange server, automatically set up mailboxes threw active directory, and have all your policies (which I don't use (or change) in this small company) and passwords tied to AD. But I think that is a small price compared to the cost and time an exchange server takes for 40 and under clients.
Loosing interoffice email is the only thing I would hate to happen. But how many times has my Internet gone down in a year? Maybe once for about 1 hour.
Piece of mind not worrying about a big cumbersome exchange server is worth the switch to hosted email.

I'm not going to debate you on this. What works well for your business works well for your business. Cost is a big deal for you, but it may not be a big deal to someone else. They may find the added functionality gained from Exchange to be well worth it.
I will say that you are grossly blowing out of proportion what it takes to manage an Exchange server. If implemented correctly, Exchange is easy to manage, especially within Small Business Server. If you don't want to learn how to deploy it, hire a competent consultant to do it.
Managing Exchange is not half the battle. Implementing Exchange correctly is 90% of the battle. If it is poorly planned and poorly deployed, it's a disaster waiting to happen. That's why it is far more important to hire someone competent to deploy it for you than finding the cheapest person to deploy it for you.
"Enough, enough bowing down to disillusion!
Hats off & applause to rogues & evolution!
The ripple effect is too good not to mention.
If you’re not affected, you’re not paying attention!"

I understand. I am only talking myself threw why or why not to drop my exchange server and try to simplify this small IT department down to nill hardware, software, administration, and administration know how.
And hearing your thoughts or anyone elses helps! So thank you.

What specifically is causing you issues with Exchange?
If I were you, I'd be considering the fact that I already bought the server and software to run Exchange. If there's a specific difficulty I'm having, what would it take to remedy that cost wise compared to switching. Exchange to you right now is a sunk cost.
"Enough, enough bowing down to disillusion!
Hats off & applause to rogues & evolution!
The ripple effect is too good not to mention.
If you’re not affected, you’re not paying attention!"

I would wait for exchange 2007 before doing anything. If you can hold out for another few months i think that would be your best bet.
Exchange can be expencive, but its a great system. You can run exchange easly on a $2000 server, $1000 software, $2000 licences for 25 ish users.
This is with exchange 2003, asooming you have AD already inplace.
Exchange is a great tool, most people only use a fraction of its capabilitys

We had a sale of company and as a result, we will be loosing our exchange server in a couple months. So instead of purchasing a new server, Microsoft Server license, Microsoft exchange, and Microsoft Exchange CALs, I figure moving everyone, 30-40 users, to POP3 would be cheaper.
No one here uses calendar sharing, task list sharing, or any folder sharing.
We would loose a centralized contacts list, but I am working on a fix for this.
I would need to set up each machine to back up their inboxes to the server share. One time setting.
Online mailboxes already support excellent SPAM and Virus protection. This is good because it is done even before the chance of getting to the company. I would still keep a corporate client virus protection running on each machine.
As goes for all the rest, we don't use any of the fancy customizations exchange has to offer anyways. In the past, we have set up and exchange box and left it running at the out of the box settings.
The reason I am questioning this is because we used to have 100+ people on an exchange box across 4 divisions. It made sense then. Now, one company division and 30-40 users with little money and knowledge in the exchange world... Is it worth it??

it is cheaper!
is your email a part of your business?
where is your data?
are there ROI elements that may be impacted?
are there employee retention elements that may be impacted?
knowledge or tacit knowledge harvesting thru enhanced use of sbs and it's sharepoint suite?
consider more angles than just expense, can you make money or improve business processes using other tools within the sbs suite? What are the values they provide?
If you are cash constrained, those things don't matter until you can pay for them. If you have a good idea of many of your elements, you can calculate both direct and indirect roi for an sbs environment.
if you only want to know about the money... then it is much cheaper to use the ISP as described....
X CTO that is back (thankfully) to being a techie...

![]() |
![]() |
![]() |

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.
| Ads by Google |