Computing.Net > Forums > Windows 2000 > Windows 2000 and MSDOS 6.2.2 on same com

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Click here to start participating now! Also, check out the New User Guide.

Windows 2000 and MSDOS 6.2.2 on same com

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Bob
Date: April 17, 2001 at 10:43:08 Pacific
Comment:

I am installing Wndows 2000 on a new hard drive and I need to have DOS available for one program. My research leads me to believe I cannot take advantage of the NTFS file system with a dual boot configuration. Can I put MSDOS 6.2.2 on a second hard drive and choose which drive I boot to?



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: lm-s
Date: April 17, 2001 at 15:03:59 Pacific
Reply:

DOS has to be on HD-1 - active Primary/system partition; installs as FAT16 into a max of 2Gig...

W2K can go 'anywhere'; but its boot/start-up files will go into the DOS partition (system/active Primary).

As your 'new' HD will be faster than the older one...

I suggest you create the DOS area on the new HD; Install DOS first; create a common (FAT16) data area as the first logical-drive on this new HD (perhaps more than one???); install W2K into a logical-drive on the new HD - after FAT16 data areas; (create all FAT32/NTFS areas after all FAT16 areas...).

Use HD-2 (the older HD) as additional data areas (with both Primary and Extended partition space).

Using older HD as HD-1 may/will reduce benefits of new HD speed-wise... W2K on faster HD will benefit...

You will have dual-boot system. W2K provides the boot-menu option.

Do not reformat the DOS area otherwise you lose access to W2K - until you do a little repair work...

Once it's all set up and running OK, make the ERD for W2K; keep safe/current.

http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q217/2/10.ASP

may also be if interest; it's modifiable to your needs...

I have seen M$ (and other Gurus) advise to install W2K at the end of a dual/multi-boot HD; with data areas in between itself and other OS's, and with FAT16 areas at the start of the Extended space, then FAT32, then NTFS...

HTH...


0

Response Number 2
Name: Bob
Date: April 17, 2001 at 19:12:11 Pacific
Reply:

lm-s,

Thanks so much for the input. I was hoping to use the smaller of the two drives (a bit older) for the dos os and the dos program, as I expect a windows version of the program in the near future. I only have to access the one dos program a few times per month, and was thinking I could do away with the msdos and program with ease, not having to reconfigure W2K again. Any more inoput before I start would be of great help. Thanks again for your input.


0

Response Number 3
Name: Bob
Date: April 19, 2001 at 15:00:33 Pacific
Reply:

Hey Bob, there are a couple of ways you can do this.

1. Get removable hard drive bays and then you can physicaly switch out which drive you want to use.

2. They make these neat hard drive switches that will let you choose which drive to boot to. Just put two drives in your system and put DOS on one and Win2k on the other.


0

Response Number 4
Name: Bob
Date: April 23, 2001 at 15:36:23 Pacific
Reply:

Thanks again for the help and input. I think I will take the switch advice, as it will allow me to deal with the DOS stuff w/o messing with the W2K configuration. Who makes the neat switches? Thanks again.


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Related Posts

See More


my microsoft office insta... Windows 2000 Stinks!



Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows 2000 Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Windows 2000 and MSDOS 6.2.2 on same com

WINDOWS 2000 AND AMD K6-2 500MHZ www.computing.net/answers/windows-2000/windows-2000-and-amd-k62-500mhz/6104.html

Windows 2000 and 98 in a Workgroup www.computing.net/answers/windows-2000/windows-2000-and-98-in-a-workgroup/53368.html

Dual Boot: Win 2000 and RedHat 6.2 (linux) www.computing.net/answers/windows-2000/dual-boot-win-2000-and-redhat-62-linux/4680.html