Computing.Net > Forums > Windows 2000 > Triple boot (Me, Win2000, 98)

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Triple boot (Me, Win2000, 98)

Reply to Message Icon

Name: master
Date: September 25, 2000 at 19:07:19 Pacific
Comment:

Hi

I have Me (C Drive) & Win2000(Drive)on my Primary HD.

I also have 98 on slave Drive alone.

When I start the computer, I can only choose Win200 & Me from Win2K loader, but not 98 from slave.

How can I add 98 to the boot loader without using 3rd part software?
Is that right I modify boot.ini will do?, If so, how??



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: Call Me Crazy
Date: September 25, 2000 at 20:09:00 Pacific
Reply:

I searched high and low in my c:\ to no avail. The NTLDR is now a superhidden file. I can not see anyway to modify a file that I can't find. Ahh a little different than booting Win98 and 2K


0

Response Number 2
Name: lm-s
Date: September 25, 2000 at 21:00:41 Pacific
Reply:

You might try adding the line:

d:\="Microsoft Windows"

to your boot.ini

Put it at the bottom of the list of installed OS's...

This presumes that your '98 HD (HD-2) has a Primary Partition and it is/will be d: and this is where '98 resides...

If you have only an Extended Partition on HD-2 then its drive letter assignment will (probably) be e: (as the Extended partition on HD-1 will be d: ). Consequently you would change the above entry to reflect that letter assignment...

Before you edit the boot.ini - make the ERD for your current W2K installation. Keep it safe/handy - just in case...

Also copy the boot.ini to a floppy, and have it handy. This way you can restore the current boot.ini if need be. You could (instead) copy the boot.ini to another location (not in the c: system partition/root-directory) on the C: drive. Again this will allow you to restore it if need-be, via boot-disk...

I haven't tried a triple-boot with '98/ME/NT so I can't guarrantee this will work... (avoiding ME...); ME is essentially another version of '98... But it's worth a try? And you can always revert to the current boot.ini if it doesn't...


0

Response Number 3
Name: lm-s
Date: September 25, 2000 at 21:09:51 Pacific
Reply:

Also it might not hurt to clearly identify that '98 entry with something indicating it's '98...


0

Response Number 4
Name: CrackedUp
Date: September 26, 2000 at 08:15:46 Pacific
Reply:

Uh I could be wrong but the bootstrap has been changed when used in conjunction with ME. A search for boot.ini and for the NTLDR yelded no results!!Difficult to edit files that you can't see. I belive that M$ has moved the B.L. to zero track for security.


0

Response Number 5
Name: master
Date: September 26, 2000 at 09:35:49 Pacific
Reply:

thanks for info.

My 2nd HD was format as a C: and was a master with win98. So according to lm-s, looks like I have to refomat my 2nd HD to F: (since my 1st HD format as C: - Win Me, D: - junk files, E: - Win 2000)

Then I should add a line as F:\="Microsoft Windows 98" to the end of boot.ini

Is that correct?


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: lm-s
Date: September 26, 2000 at 19:09:58 Pacific
Reply:

I’m a little confused about how your HD’s are configured etc.

Presuming initially with one HD…

HD-1: (Single HD)
Primary c: ME
Extended d: = ‘junk’; e: = W2K

You add a second HD… (SLAVE)
If configured with both Primary and Extended partitions, it will become:
Primary d:
Extended g: (then h: and so on if two or more logical drives present…)

And HD-1 (now made to be MASTER with SLAVE) will become:
Primary c:
Extended e: = junk; f: = W2K (Note the drive letter assignments have changed…)

If you configure HD-2 (SLAVE) with Extended partition only it will be f:
and HD-1 will remain: (MASTER with SLAVE)
Primary c: ME
Extended d: = ‘junk’; e: = W2K (No change in drive letter assignments…)

So in order to avoid ‘screwing up all the registry entries for W2K… configure HD-2 with an Extended partition (NO Primary). It can be a single partition or broken up into logical-drives. Either way the first letter/drive assignment will be f: and the drive letter assignments on HD-1 will be unchanged.

Install ’98 into ‘f: ‘

Add entry to boot.ini as suggested… (f: \=”microsoft windows 98”)

I wouldn’t mess with HD-1 and make it the SLAVE to HD-2 as MASTER… HD-1 works OK with the dual-boot and has the boot-loader etc. installed on the C: (ME) system partition. Leave HD-1 alone… Keep HD-2 as the SLAVE.. Doing it this way means that if you cannot get ’98 to triple-boot you can still at least revert to the original ME/W2K system (HD-1). As before make a copy of the ME/W2K boot.ini somewhere safe…

And as I said earlier, I haven’t tried this but can’t see why it won’t work… I do not know if ’98 will upset the ME boot/start-up files residing in the C: system partition, or if you will (successfully) have both ME and ’98 (boot/start-up) files there alongside W2K’s (boot/start-up) files. If ’98 replaces ME’s boot files, then I guess you can’t have both ’98 and ME going the above route… and to recover ME you would have to re-install ME (i.e. overwrite the current ME installation); and thus lose ’98. If this is the case, then you will have to use a third-party boot-manager (PM5x comes with one…). In some ways I’d be inclined to consider this latter option – but it won’t hurt to try the above as long as you leave HD-1 the MASTER… (and make the ERD for W2K before starting out…)

“For Cracked up…”

The ntldr, ntdetect.com files are ‘hidden by default… which is why they don’t show up in Explorer or are indicated in Find Files’, unless you enable ‘show all files’ in View/options… I can't see why this should be any different in a dual/multi-boot with ME...? I've seen no reference to this effect anywhere else...


"master" - post back how this works out? It's useful for others to know about regardless?


0

Response Number 7
Name: master
Date: September 27, 2000 at 07:25:10 Pacific
Reply:

thanks, l-ms, your suggestion is very helpful. I was unable to try last night as some files in the slave (2-HD) had not backed up by my sister yet. Will try tonight.

To tell more about my situation, here is my config.

HD-1: 15G, Quantum LM, ATA66
HD-2: 2.1G, NEC DES-2100A, ATA33

Before any upgrade to Me & Win2000, I had 2 copies of Win 98, one on HD-1(master), primary partition; another one on HD-2(slave), primary partition.

Ofcourse, I was unable to boot the slave in normal situation, so I found one 3rd party utility called "OS Loader 2000", it is small in size and works great so far. I can had a menu and choose which drive to boot up, either a:, HD-1 or HD-2, no problem at all.

But once I mess around the HD-1, which means I delete everthing without formally uninstall the 3rd party boot utility, I cannot boot HD-2(slave), although Win98 in priamry partition of HD-2, which is c: of Hd-2. I believe the OS loader 2000 had overwrite something and it was my mistake of not unistall the program properly.

So last night, I had to reinstall a fresh copy of Win98 and installed OSLoader 2000 (which actually use DOS, that's why I had to install win98 again, Me does not use any DOS now). OS Loader recoginzed HD-2(slave) and able to pick the infomation up and displayed on its menu, that means I can boot to HD-2 again!

Now, lm-s, I have a few questions:

1. Let say I clean up everything in HD-1 & HD-2, I format as follow (like what you suggest):

Hd-1 (master): Primary partition: 'Me' (C:)
Extendend: 'Junk' (D:)
'2000' (E:)
HD-2 (slave): Extended: 'win98' (F:)

Will I be able to boot to HD-2 (f:) if I make HD-2 as master and physically discconnect HD-1. Which means the system now only has HD-2 as master?

2. What if I had done something stupid to HD-1 and cannot boot, how can I retreive the data in HD-2?

3. Which file makes Win98 to boot up? I tried to use a floppy boot disk to boot Win98, it went to dos okay, but as I type 'win' at c:\windows prompt, it says HiMEM.SYS is missing, I checked the windows directory, HIMEM.SYS is in the directory, why cannot go into Win98?

I really appreciate your advice since I am not an expert in this area. Also, sorry for my english if that confuse you.


0

Response Number 8
Name: CrackedUp
Date: September 27, 2000 at 08:13:56 Pacific
Reply:

OK..I was rite and so was lm-s, there is a second setting in folder views and it controls the view of "SUPER HIDDEN" files. OK than what is ARCLDR???


0

Response Number 9
Name: lm-s
Date: September 27, 2000 at 18:49:16 Pacific
Reply:

Answering your questions about reconfiguring your HD’s…

If there is only an Extended partition on a HD then you cannot boot from it… To allow a HD to be bootable you must have the Primary partition, and also the system files for an OS installed there, and it must betive’…

If you make HD-2 with an Extended partition only, then it will only be accessible via another bootable drive – either another HD (e.g. your present HD-1) with an installed OS (and one that can ‘see’ FAT32) or a boot-floppy. So if you were to lose your present HD-1, you would need a ’98 boot-disk to access the Extended (only) partitioned HD-2; it will have to a ’98 disk (or ‘95 OSR2b or c) as these are the boot-disks disks that can read FAT32…

If you wished to be able to lose/remove HD-1 and be able to access HD-2, then it would be wiser to install ’98 on on HD-2 with HD-2 set as the SINGLE Master (NO Slave). There would need to be either a single Primary partition on HD-2, or both a Primary and an Extended area; then install ’98 into the Primary partition; or the Extended area. If you chose to put ’98 into the Extended area, then the ’98 boot/start-up files would automatically go into the Primary partition (active primary) on the HD-2; this would would happen if HD-2 was the only HD present (or the MASTER/bootable HD), when you ran ’98 set-up routine. ’98 would automatically install its boot/start-up files into the C: primary partition, and put the system (OS itself) files into the Extended area when you told it to… If you opted to install ’98 into the C: Primary area then both the boot/start-up files and the system files (the OS itself) would be in that partition.

If you then rearranged both HD’s so that HD-1 (the ME system…) was back as MASTER WITH SLAVE, and HD-2 was now reset to SLAVE, you would still need to re-install ’98 on HD-2 (in effect do an overwrite) so as to establish the ’98 boot/start-up files within the c: system (active primary) partition on HD-1; thus allowing NT/W2K’s boot-loader to know about the presence and location of ’98 on HD-2

Whichever HD is the MASTER, all installed OS’s have to be installed through that HD’s C; system partition; so as to install all OS boot/start-up files there…

If you had only an Extended partition on HD-2 and lost HD-1, then as long as you have ’98 boot-disk, you can access the data on HD-2. If HD-2 had a Primary partition and ’98 was installed as outlined above (into either the Primary or Extended area), then by resetting HD-2 to be a MASTER HD you could boot to it and run/access ’98…

If you examine the contents of a boot-disk you will see a selection of files there. Fdisk, Format, Delete; and a few other files including: IO.sys; Config.sys: MSDOS.sys; Command.com; probably Command.dos and IO.dos and maybe Autoexec.bat.

If I remember correctly… the critcial files are: command.com; IO.sys; MSDOS.sys; Config.sys. But I stand to be corrected on this bit – I don’t have my manuals to hand to confirm which files are which for the boot sequence…

http://support.microsoft.com/support/windows/readme/98/W98setuptxt.asp

http://support.microsoft.com/support/windows/readme/Win98se/w98sesetuptxt.asp

may be useful items to read from M$ Knowledge Base…They include how to install/load HiMEM.sys which is what’s missing from your boot-disk instructions…

If no-one comes through with more specifici information on the boot-disk issue I’ll dig into my manuals at home and see what’s there – you could do the same???

Your English is just fine!

Good luck…


0

Response Number 10
Name: Mike
Date: September 29, 2000 at 06:34:34 Pacific
Reply:

I would simply buy System Commander and not risk wasting time trying to do manually what is easily done automatically.


0

Response Number 11
Name: master
Date: September 29, 2000 at 11:24:27 Pacific
Reply:

No luck at all!

Cannot do a triple boot. I need 3rd party program. I tried OS Loader 2000, free to download and somehow I cannot see my ext.partition in HD-1, I send am email to the author and hopes he can help me.

That means I have to go back Win98 since the OSLoader works for DOS.


0

Response Number 12
Name: bobw
Date: October 1, 2000 at 05:32:48 Pacific
Reply:

folks are going to think i get a commission here but i dont.... www.masterboot.com up to 12 os's 19 bucks nothing very easy to use


0

Response Number 13
Name: Ravendon
Date: December 3, 2000 at 09:20:41 Pacific
Reply:

Go to c:\, type attrib -h -r -s boot.ini.
You can do this from windows 2000 from command.com.
Then you can type edit, hit alt, f, o, then navigate to your boot.ini file and open it and modify it.

"Response Number 4
Name: CrackedUp
Date: September 26, 2000 at 08:15:46
Subject: Triple boot (Me, Win2000, 98)

Reply:
Uh I could be wrong but the bootstrap has been changed when used in conjunction with ME. A search for boot.ini and for the NTLDR yelded no results!!Difficult to edit files that you can't see. I belive that M$ has moved the B.L. to zero track for security."


Go to http://www.winplanet.com/winplanet/tutorials/737/1/

"Response Number 11
Name: master
Date: September 29, 2000 at 11:24:27
Subject: Triple boot (Me, Win2000, 98)

Reply:
No luck at all!
Cannot do a triple boot. I need 3rd party program. I tried OS Loader 2000, free to download and somehow I cannot see my ext.partition in HD-1, I send am email to the author and hopes he can help me.

That means I have to go back Win98 since the OSLoader works for DOS."




0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows 2000 Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Triple boot (Me, Win2000, 98)

Triple Boot NT4.0, 98, W2k with Boot Manager www.computing.net/answers/windows-2000/triple-boot-nt40-98-w2k-with-boot-manager/5848.html

Triple Boot 98/2k/Nt Server, Help www.computing.net/answers/windows-2000/triple-boot-982knt-server-help/4226.html

Triple booting Win2000 www.computing.net/answers/windows-2000/triple-booting-win2000/2201.html