|
| Computing.Net: Over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to sign up now, it's free! |
Installing 2000
|
Original Message
|
Name: jlmclean
Date: November 16, 2006 at 15:33:43 Pacific
Subject: Installing 2000OS: 2000 proCPU/Ram: Pent II/32MBModel/Manufacturer: IBM/300 GL |
Comment: How do you load 2000 Pro? It tells me that "setup" won't run from DOS.
Report Offensive Message For Removal
|
|
Response Number 1
|
Name: jboy
Date: November 16, 2006 at 16:16:50 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)Boot. from. the. CD. If necessary, configure your CMOS setup so that the CD drive is ahead of the hard drive in the boot order 32Mb is below the recommended minimum RAM (64Mb+) If I know the answer I'll tell you the answer, and if I don't, I'll just respond, cleverly--Donald Rumsfeld
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 3
|
Name: trvlr
Date: November 16, 2006 at 22:23:01 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)Trailing in after Jeffiner... 32Meg RAM is inadquate for W2K; I doubt it will even install with that amount... But if you increase it somewhat... then with at least 128Meg it will run OK, albeit a little slowly... I have (an elderly Dell) P-2/233 that handles W2K just fine; initially with only 128Meg RAM it was a little slow... but with 320Meg it's fine... Incidentally if no CD boot allowed (and I think all of that generation of kit allows it), then use the 4 W2K boot-floppies (+ CD) to install W2K.
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 4
|
Name: jboy
Date: November 16, 2006 at 23:22:50 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)... it'll run 'ok' with 64Mb (and some services disabled) - although just 'idling', the pagefile is around 75Mb A "GL" should support CD booting (of course, that only works if it's actually, y'know, tried) As above - don't even bother until there's more memory If I know the answer I'll tell you the answer, and if I don't, I'll just respond, cleverly--Donald Rumsfeld
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 5
|
Name: Mechanix2Go
Date: November 17, 2006 at 02:17:32 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)If you get enough RAM... The "setup" for w2k is \i386\winnt.exe ===================================== If at first you don't succeed, you're about average.M2
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 6
|
Name: trvlr
Date: November 17, 2006 at 05:09:23 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)but if run from a dos boot (typically via a '98SE bootdisk) ... t'will also need to have smartdrv.exe installed/running too; otherwise 't'will take for ever and ever and ever... and e v e r. . . . .
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 9
|
Name: Bob587819
Date: November 17, 2006 at 08:23:56 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)After all that, we still have about 100 IBM 300GL's which we upgraded to 256Mb memory, loaded Win2000, SP4 and they make adequate workstations running office apps. We built just one, added all the apps and "ghosted" it. We can build a complete machine in 20 minutes so it's probably worth the effort if the Boss doesn't want to buy new PC's. That is the biggest fool thing we have ever done. The Atomic bomb will never go off, and I speak as an expert in explosives. - Admiral William Leahy
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 10
|
Name: jlmclean
Date: November 21, 2006 at 16:03:29 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)Thanks Everyone!! I really appreciate all the help. I did get 2000 loaded with the 32MB but I didn't install smartdrv.exe (If someone wants to describe how that's done, I'd really appreciate that also) and like you said, it took for ever and ever and ever and ever. I think about 4-5 hours. I did get another 64MB memory which brought me up to 96MB. I have some 128's on order and hope they will make a big difference. All I want this computer for is to run a CAD program and I think it will do that good enough for me, I'm kinda slow anyway. Thanks again and everyone have a GREAT and HAPPY THANKSGIVING.
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|

Post Locked
This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.
Go to Windows 2000 Forum Home
|
|
|