Computing.Net > Forums > Windows 2000 > Humor Me!

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Humor Me!

Reply to Message Icon

Name: John OS
Date: April 17, 2002 at 01:02:36 Pacific
Comment:

ok is windows ME(melinium)(turn of the centery year 2000) the same as windows 2000!(turn of the centery year 2000)

explain this to me, why did microsoft name two OS'es, basically Technically the same?



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: jacko
Date: April 17, 2002 at 02:01:09 Pacific
Reply:

There is no comparison! Me is a bloated win98 system running on fat16 or 32 and win2k is built on the nt kernel which can run on ntfs for more file security.
Me was windows earlier attempt at XP.


0

Response Number 2
Name: Harold de Vries
Date: April 17, 2002 at 03:23:18 Pacific
Reply:

They are definitely NOT the same. I have both OS'es on my computer (P3-500, 512 MB). You should see the difference in performance. 2000 runs very fast, ME runs slow.

Harry


0

Response Number 3
Name: Dave C
Date: April 17, 2002 at 05:18:40 Pacific
Reply:

Windows ME, as Jacko said, was the next step in the Windows 95-98 line, but was quickly overshadowed by XP Home edition.

Windows 2000 is the latest version of Windows NT, which is more targeted to business use.

-Dave C


0

Response Number 4
Name: 666
Date: April 17, 2002 at 15:01:26 Pacific
Reply:

XP is the Latest in the Windows NT line. The Windows 9x line died with ME.


0

Response Number 5
Name: John OS
Date: April 18, 2002 at 01:29:46 Pacific
Reply:

no no I'm talking about the NAME of the operating systems, not the "build" of the systems!


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: Joe
Date: April 18, 2002 at 01:58:59 Pacific
Reply:

The turn of the century is 2001, not 2000, so ME and 2000 are not the same name.


0

Response Number 7
Name: ShutMeUpOrDown:)
Date: April 18, 2002 at 02:50:23 Pacific
Reply:

Whats been keeping me up at night.......

Home: 95-98-98se and then ME
Pro: NT and then 2000?

Why did MS decide to swap the naming process?
Me should have been 2000 and 2000 should have been ME :).

They fixed that mistake by naming them both XP.

Now i can sleep.



0

Response Number 8
Name: what the...
Date: April 18, 2002 at 09:04:10 Pacific
Reply:

who cares.


0

Response Number 9
Name: John OS
Date: April 18, 2002 at 12:00:06 Pacific
Reply:

so Joe your saying windows ME is a newer operating system than y2k2000?

Technically the new centery begins in 2001 cause 0 has no value!

But why did we celebrate the millinium on the 2000 new year? Shouldn't it be 2001?

This still leaves the question "up in the air"


0

Response Number 10
Name: Derek
Date: April 18, 2002 at 13:47:46 Pacific
Reply:

Yes JohnOS

Of-course the new Millenium really started in Jan 01, because there was no year 0.

Why did we celebrate it early? Dunno, for some reason us humans just love lot's of noughts.

.... BUT what about all those Emperors who monkied with the calander. Maybe the new Millenium went years before, or is due any time....

.... BUT suppose we had been blessed with 12 fingers (or some other number) and our numbering system had therefore been different....


0

Response Number 11
Name: Derek
Date: April 18, 2002 at 13:51:32 Pacific
Reply:

... and what if I'd spelt Millennium right.


0

Response Number 12
Name: sourcer3
Date: April 22, 2002 at 18:36:27 Pacific
Reply:

If you notice when you try to put win 2k on over win ME it won't work. Win ME considers it to be a down grade I believe. So wouldn't it be that windows 2k should have came out before ME?

God dawm microsoft is confusing me
"Computers are like air conditionners, they stop working properly when you open windows"


0

Response Number 13
Name: Derek
Date: April 22, 2002 at 19:20:31 Pacific
Reply:

Too blooming true!


0

Response Number 14
Name: shanna
Date: May 1, 2002 at 11:31:25 Pacific
Reply:

sourcer3....when i installed win2k on my comp OVER me, it said that win2k was a newer version....did not consider it a downgrade....


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

ECS D6VAA motherboard...o... NT/W2K login script query



Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows 2000 Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Humor Me!

HELP ME...I'm trying to re install windows 95 www.computing.net/answers/windows-2000/help-meim-trying-to-re-install-windows-95/4597.html

pls help me! www.computing.net/answers/windows-2000/pls-help-me/54036.html

A very hard problem(for me) www.computing.net/answers/windows-2000/a-very-hard-problemfor-me/42551.html