Computing.Net > Forums > Web Development > check accessiblity of this site.

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

check accessiblity of this site.

Reply to Message Icon

Name: pmkdatabase
Date: August 24, 2005 at 03:23:49 Pacific
OS: XP- W2K server
CPU/Ram: 2.8 mhz 2 GB
Comment:

Hi,

We've started hosting our own site in Thailand rather than using a service in the USA. I need to know how accessible it is, would and appreciate it if anyone would browse over to http://pmci.net or http://wwww.pmci.net and let me know on a scale of 1-5 how fast it loads and where you are located.

If you cannot connect, please confirm the name resolves to 203.156.190.81 but don't try to access the site by IP.

Thanks,

Peter



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: Sci-Guy
Date: August 24, 2005 at 05:56:11 Pacific
Reply:

I'm in Australia and the site loaded quickly. On a scale of 1 - 5, I'd have to say 5.

The domain does resolve to 203.156.109.81.

Please let us know if you found someone's advice to be helpful.


0

Response Number 2
Name: RandyH1959
Date: August 24, 2005 at 09:23:35 Pacific
Reply:

I am in Florida, U.S.A and the site took about 30 seconds to load. I tried it a couple of times with the same result. When it first loads, most of the images are not showing up. I clicked page refresh and they all appeared. I closed my browser and tried again and the same thing happened.


0

Response Number 3
Name: Michael J (by mjdamato)
Date: August 24, 2005 at 10:19:48 Pacific
Reply:

Wichita, KS USA on corporate T1 connection.

Took about 10 seconds for first page to load. Subsequent pages took 1-3 seconds each.

Michael J


0

Response Number 4
Name: -Bryan-
Date: August 24, 2005 at 12:58:41 Pacific
Reply:

Southern California. I'd say a 4 on the load time. 5.5mbit connection.

Pinging 203.156.190.81 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 203.156.190.81: bytes=32 time=309ms TTL=234
Reply from 203.156.190.81: bytes=32 time=307ms TTL=234
Reply from 203.156.190.81: bytes=32 time=306ms TTL=234
Reply from 203.156.190.81: bytes=32 time=310ms TTL=234

Ping statistics for 203.156.190.81:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 306ms, Maximum = 310ms, Average = 308ms


0

Response Number 5
Name: FishMonger
Date: August 24, 2005 at 13:48:56 Pacific
Reply:

I'd give it a 3 on the initial load time. 10 seconds for initial load, under 3 seconds for most of the links.

San Jose, Calif
T1 connection

C:\>ping www.pmci.net

Pinging pmci.net [203.156.190.81] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 203.156.190.81: bytes=32 time=271ms TTL=233
Reply from 203.156.190.81: bytes=32 time=264ms TTL=233
Reply from 203.156.190.81: bytes=32 time=261ms TTL=233
Reply from 203.156.190.81: bytes=32 time=267ms TTL=233

Ping statistics for 203.156.190.81:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 261ms, Maximum = 271ms, Average = 265ms

C:\>ping computing.net

Pinging computing.net [69.93.141.100] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 69.93.141.100: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=42
Reply from 69.93.141.100: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=42
Reply from 69.93.141.100: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=42
Reply from 69.93.141.100: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=42

Ping statistics for 69.93.141.100:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 50ms, Maximum = 51ms, Average = 50ms

C:\>ping www.google.com

Pinging www.l.google.com [66.102.7.99] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.102.7.99: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=240
Reply from 66.102.7.99: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=240
Reply from 66.102.7.99: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=240
Reply from 66.102.7.99: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=240

Ping statistics for 66.102.7.99:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 5ms, Maximum = 6ms, Average = 5ms


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: bmeek
Date: August 24, 2005 at 14:29:04 Pacific
Reply:

Ohio here. I give it 4 on initial load and 5 on the links.


0

Response Number 7
Name: tau_titan
Date: August 25, 2005 at 11:18:52 Pacific
Reply:

Good old England here... 2mbit connection took 8 seconds to load initial page and about 2-3 for the others. 3 for the homepage and 5 for the others.

Matt

www.bbcomputing.co.uk

matt@bbcomputing.co.uk


0

Response Number 8
Name: pmkdatabase
Date: August 25, 2005 at 22:02:09 Pacific
Reply:

Thanks a lot, guys. I appreciate it.

Peter


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon






Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Web Development Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: check accessiblity of this site.

what do you think of my site? www.computing.net/answers/webdevel/what-do-you-think-of-my-site/3173.html

KNOWN probs loading CitiCards.com?? www.computing.net/answers/webdevel/known-probs-loading-citicardscom/826.html

Evaluation... ;) www.computing.net/answers/webdevel/evaluation-/904.html