Hi all, What would you say is better for professional website design

ASP.Net 2.0 - version 3.0 when it is released or PHP 4/5

Thanks in Advance

i know nothing about asp but LOVE php

serge

SEO Resources

Target the right Keywords

FREE SEO Report

me knows nothing about ASP too

But I think .NET is better for large applications, even the current version one. But of course it'll cost you more.

> For professional website design

If we talk about layout design then the valid XHTML and CSS will do. For dynamic pages, PHP will do well on small to medium-large applications.

---

and here's a (probably) related reading:
Web 2.0

---
Fubar

Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

I don't know asp, (my preference is Perl) but I do know a little php and between php and asp, php is better partly because it's platform independent and from what I've seen of asp, php is a cleaner and more consise language.

I have worked with both. Personally I think the platform you choose will depend upon your target audience AND what type of work you will be doing.

I would say that the more your products lean towards real web-based applications the more you should consider ASP. Whereas PHP is a great choice for site that just need some variable content. You can get pretty sofisticated with PHP, but ASP is the winner when dealing with real applications.

As for your customer base, ASP would be preferred by larger organizations. They typically run IIS and ASP because it is MS and because they can get support - although it costs a lot. PHP is free but has no support. However, it makes up over 60% of web servers on the internet, so it is the most ubiquitous.

Michael J

I do ASP.NET professionally, and PHP and Perl for side projects. Earlier posts were right on...ASP.NET scales much better than PHP or classic ASP does, but it costs more to host on account if it needing to run on a windows server. Microsoft has free IDEs for beginning ASP.NET developers...You don't need to pony up the $500 for Visual Studio.

I think ASP.NET is favored by large organizations because the extra money they spend on infrastructure is nothing compared to how much they save in developer costs because ASP.NET is much, much faster to develop large applications in than PHP.

PHP is definitely more clean and concise than classic ASP (with vbscript or javascript), but it's a mess compared to C#, J#, or even VB.NET, which are the common languages used for ASP.NET apps.

For quick and dirty sites that don't need a ton of code, PHP is the better choice (which is why it's so popular...most sites don't need ASP.NET scalability.) I love PHP and am actually almost into beta testing with a PHP IDE I've been working on for the last year or so (ironically written using .NET). I'm trying to solve some of the scalability problems that make it inferior to ASP.NET for large projects.

It's also worth noting that professionally, the job market is better in quantity and dollars for ASP.NET developers. The best offer I've ever received doing PHP was under $40k per year, but it's not too tough to get into the six figures as a .NET developer.

I haven't looked into ASP.NET 3 (since 2 is only a year old), but I doubt it will be leaps and bounds over v2.0.

Good luck!
-SN