Computing.Net > Forums > Unix > Unix and Linux

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Unix and Linux

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Jperro
Date: January 29, 2002 at 10:17:49 Pacific
Comment:

Can you guys tell me the difference between Unix and Linux. I'm a Mac OsX user.



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: Beaker
Date: January 29, 2002 at 12:18:29 Pacific
Reply:

The answer to this could easily expand to thesis-size, however some basic differences you might be interested in are:

- Linux uses Linus Torvalds's kernel ; other UNIXes & UNIX-like OSes use other kernels. The kernel is the heart of the operating system and controls the hardware, while the "distribution" - ie Redhat, Caldera, etc) is the operating system's "coating" containing commands, drivers, utilities, etc. This coating is the interface between you and the kernel. This is why you'll occasionally see "GNU/Linux" or "Debian/Linux" as the OS discription. BTW, its my understanding that Mac OSX is basically "Aqua" - Apple's GUI - with a Free/NetBSD-derived kernel.

- "Linux" development is more distributed than other UNIXes in that the kernel and the "distributions" are developed by separate groups: Most other UNIX/UNIX-like OSes have centralized development of the entire OS. There are pros and cons to both strategies: distributed development can be faster but lead to OS instability and software incompatabilies; centralized development can be slower but often results in fewer instabilites, etc.

- "Linux" distributions and the kernel are governed by the GNU Public License (GPL) which stipulates that you can freely modify & sell (for profit) the software as long as all changes are made freely available. This is why you can freely download most any flavor of "Linux". Other UNIX/UNIX-like OSes vary as to the governing license: SUN Solaris is freely available for non-commercial/non-modifiable use but without the source code. Alternately, Free/Open/NetBSD are governed by the BSD license and are freely available for ANY use - source code included - WITHOUT the stipluation that you publicly release any modifications you make. This makes them more attactive then Linux to developers of embedded applications.

I'm sure others could elaborate - extensively - on this answer, but I think this highlights the differences most end users would be interested in.
Cheers,
Beaker


0

Response Number 2
Name: bigbang780
Date: February 1, 2002 at 16:11:09 Pacific
Reply:

to keep things simple, Linux is the free version of Unix


0

Response Number 3
Name: javier
Date: July 15, 2002 at 12:54:55 Pacific
Reply:

could anyone tell me whats difference between a UNIX\UNIX like OSes and a linux one


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Related Posts

See More







Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Unix Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Unix and Linux

Unix or Linux? www.computing.net/answers/unix/unix-or-linux/2849.html

A question about Unix and Linux www.computing.net/answers/unix/a-question-about-unix-and-linux/3264.html

Diff between linux and unix? www.computing.net/answers/unix/diff-between-linux-and-unix/1737.html