Computing.Net > Forums > Security and Virus > Symantec flaw hits 30 products

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Symantec flaw hits 30 products

Reply to Message Icon

Name: IronMan
Date: February 11, 2005 at 18:44:37 Pacific
OS: XP Pro
CPU/Ram: P4 512MB
Comment:


A cross-platform flaw affecting many Symantec security products - both consumer and enterprise - has been discovered. Users of Symantec's Norton SystemWorks 2004, Norton SystemWorks 2004 (both Mac and Windows), Norton AntiVirus 2004, corporate anti-virus apps and Brightmail anti-spam software (among others) all need to apply patches following the discovery of the "highly critical" security bug. In all 30 packages are affected.

Story



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: JackG
Date: February 11, 2005 at 21:26:31 Pacific
Reply:

A related Critical problem has also been found by ISS in F-Secure products, but related to the AJR archive format instead of UPX. They have hotfixes in place for current products that are automatically being destributed. Older products need to install the hotfixes or upgrade.



0

Response Number 2
Name: SallyG
Date: February 11, 2005 at 23:30:44 Pacific
Reply:

I knew that Norton was just a farce....they package it in PC deals and make people believe that they are a necessity....NOT! McAfee is another and then lets bring in AOL...Great way to jam things down a new buyers throat.

There are freebies on-line that outperform most of the so-called PAY FOR utilities, I know, because I use them.


0

Response Number 3
Name: Atlantic
Date: February 12, 2005 at 00:54:12 Pacific
Reply:

SallyG makes a good point. New PC users assume (wrongly for the most part) that if a free trial version from a major software vendor is already installed, it must be good. Especially if the software is installed on a major brand (HP, Dell, etc.) computer.

That said, all utilities are not the same, and even the best ones change--for better or worse--over time. In that sense, a trial version is valuable. A good example would be over a year ago, when Zone Alarm released firewall 5.0. Both the free and Pro (shareware) versions were riddled with flaws, subsequently fixed. Of course, there's always the risk that a trial version, should you not like it, will not uninstall properly--or worse.

IronMan's posting for Symantec's problems is a valuable heads-up, but I got rid of Norton years ago for other reasons (many documented here at Computing.net by the hundreds). McAfee too; their technical support can only be called, charitably, piss-poor. After trying several other antivirus utilities, I finally settled on Nod32, and then only after I'd researched the product in the major trades. It received uniformly good reviews, so I installed the 30-day free trial. A month later, I gladly payed for a year's subscription.

This isn't a commericial for Nod32, just an example that, sometimes, one has to pay (and rightly so) for a quality product. Also, I don't presume my words will benefit the already experienced PC user.

But for those new to the game, explore the online trade magazines for reviews. Ask questions of other forum members here at Computing.net for their experiences. In short: research. You'll save yourself time, grief, and (if freeware's not available) money.


0

Response Number 4
Name: Atlantic
Date: February 12, 2005 at 01:31:57 Pacific
Reply:

PS I didn't address SallyG's main point, which was the high quality of some freeware itself (not just free trial versions of shareware).

Good examples of freeware abound: RegSeeker, SpywareBlaster, CrapCleaner, the freeware version of Sygate personal firewall; just to mention a few.

I've not found this to be true with free AV software. Of course, this is only my own opinion and experience. AVG7, Avast, Anti-Vir have all left me wanting more, for various reasons. Actually, it came down to a choice between Nod32 and Hauri, but I found Hauri too greedy with resources, when Nod32 could accomplish the same protection with fewer CPU cycles.


0

Response Number 5
Name: Snooker
Date: February 12, 2005 at 08:33:14 Pacific
Reply:

Hi everyone ... Just before I read this post I just purchase NOD32 , but I'm curious how it works ? Do you download first the trial version until they sent the rest of the info in a email ?? Reason as to why I am asking is because its now been a day and a half without hearing from them , Again I'm thinking its because of the weekend and they are not open at this time , Any idea or help ?? Thanks


0

Related Posts

See More



Response Number 6
Name: Internet
Date: February 12, 2005 at 08:51:02 Pacific
Reply:

Downloading the trial version first is not necessary. The weekend may have something to due with the delay.

More likely, however, is a delay caused because a credit card was used for payment; your card is perfectly valid, but there's a problem with the company's server that issued the card. It shouldn't matter, but remember that Nod32 is in Australia. There are many intermidiary servers between you, Nod32, and the credit card's bank. :)


0

Response Number 7
Name: Snooker
Date: February 12, 2005 at 12:31:17 Pacific
Reply:

Hi Internet ... Its funny just as I was to post this post I did one last email check , Guess what ? I recieve my info from them , They say the problem was the person who was responsible for sending out this info got my email incorrect and this is why I couldn't recieve the data that I needed , I'm okay now ... Thanks for your info though ...


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

SSl128 bit -iexpl cant lo... ABTrusion inquiry



Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Security and Virus Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Symantec flaw hits 30 products

PayPal SCAM=VIRUS www.computing.net/answers/security/paypal-scamvirus/7481.html

Antivirus for Windows 2000 Server www.computing.net/answers/security/antivirus-for-windows-2000-server/988.html

Jammjb can't open your post www.computing.net/answers/security/jammjb-cant-open-your-post/21605.html