Computing.Net > Forums > Programming > Visual Studio and Visual Studio .NE

Computing.Net: Over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to sign up now, it's free!

Visual Studio and Visual Studio .NE

Reply to Message Icon

Original Message
Name: rjb03001
Date: June 28, 2004 at 19:54:03 Pacific
Subject: Visual Studio and Visual Studio .NE
OS: Windows XP
CPU/Ram: 512 MB RAM
Comment:

Hello Fellow programmers....

I am a programmer myself, but I program calculators... anyways, I have a question please: I would like to know "What is the difference between Microsoft Visual Studio [Standard/Professional/Enterprise...Doesn't matter] and Microsoft Visual Studio .NET

Besides the obvious that one of them is expensive, what is the major difference(s)?

Please help me out.

thanks in advance.

-Ghooooost


Report Offensive Message For Removal


Response Number 1
Name: Don Arnett
Date: June 29, 2004 at 09:38:57 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

You are comparing apples to oranges.

Standard, Professional, and Enterprise are different levels that MS uses to describe many of their products. For example, MS Office is available in Standard and Professional version (not sure about Enterprise). MS Visual Studio 6.0 is/was available in Standard, Professional and Enterprise versions. MS Visual Studio .NET is available in Standard, Professional, and Enterprise versions. The generic difference between the three versions is that Standard is the cheapest and has the fewest features, while Enterprise is the most expensive and has the most features. You can look at the MS website for a comparison of features between the versions.

MS Visual Studio .NET can be considered MS Visual Studio 7.0. It is the next major upgrade from MS Visual Studio 6.0. It includes C/C++, C#, Java, VB and some other minor stuff. C# and I believe Java are new to MS VS since 6.0



Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 2
Name: Infinite Recursion
Date: June 29, 2004 at 18:25:32 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

On a side note. Visual Studio 6.0 had J++.
Visual Studio .NET has C#. Don't forget that .NET has most, if not all, of the features that were available in 6.0. The main thing here is the .NET framework which
may be the technology that MS applications will be centered around in the future. I personally have both, but I have turned a cold shoulder to 6.0 after using .NET.

Definitely, check out the .NET framework white papers... to see if it is even worth the time/effort in your implementation.

IR


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 3
Name: Sanjaya Sugiarto (by Sanjaya)
Date: June 29, 2004 at 23:25:08 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

MS has included its owned Java in .NET plattform calles J#. Although the grammatic of J# is very close to Java, I would say not to use this language, because it is included some classes (or packages) that are not compatible with the real Java (http://java.sun.com). Therefore the famous Java magic words "write once, run anywhere", wouldnt be run under J#. If you want to programm Java than just use standard Java from Sun. If you want programm under .NET plattform than use c# or VB.Net (C# is a very interesting language which is close to Java, VB.Net is easier to learn)

San


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal







Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Programming Forum Home








Do you have your own blog?

Yes
No
I did before
I will soon


View Results

Poll Finishes In 4 Days.
Discuss in The Lounge
Poll History




Data Recovery Software