using a hub vs. a switch
|
Original Message
|
Name: es445
Date: January 25, 2005 at 10:33:28 Pacific
Subject: using a hub vs. a switchOS: OSXv10.2.8CPU/Ram: ? |
Comment: Are there any differences in using a hub or a switch to network our computers? Or are those just two names for the same piece of equipment . Thanks
Report Offensive Message For Removal
|
|
Response Number 1
|
Name: ClydeB
Date: January 25, 2005 at 11:09:15 Pacific
Subject: using a hub vs. a switch |
Reply: (edit)A switch is smart vs a hub which is just a connecting point. If you have internet sharing in mind a router should be included in your equipment mix as well.
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 2
|
Name: StuartS
Date: January 25, 2005 at 11:33:02 Pacific
Subject: using a hub vs. a switch |
Reply: (edit)A hub is dumb piece of equipment. It takes data in at one port and spews it out to all the others with no consideration as to where it came from of where is going to. Plus that only work at 10 Mps Half Duplex. A switch on the other hand looks as the data as it comes in and only sends it out the port that its destination is connected to, buffering data if required thus reducing collisions. A collision is when two computers try to send data over the network at the same time. They work at 100Mbs full duplex. So get a switch. The price difference is negligible. If you have Internet sharing in mind a router is essential unless you intend to use Internet Connection Sharing via software which is unreliable at best. Most routers for home use have a four port switch built in. You cannot share an Internet connection with a switch or a hub. Stuart
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 3
|
Name: kev100
Date: January 25, 2005 at 17:53:11 Pacific
Subject: using a hub vs. a switch |
Reply: (edit)Is there any situation where a hub is preferrable/required...or is a hub just older pre-switch technology which is still hanging around (kinda like ISA drive adapter cards)?
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 4
|
Name: StuartS
Date: January 25, 2005 at 18:02:26 Pacific
Subject: using a hub vs. a switch |
Reply: (edit)Not really. There was a time when switches, being more complex, were considerably more expensive than hubs. Therefor a hub were used for economical reasons. They both do pretty much the same job but a hub is simpler and therefore cheaper. These days there is not a lot to chose between the two so switches tend to be more used and the more they are used the cheaper they become relative to hubs. Stuart
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 5
|
Name: FishMonger
Date: January 25, 2005 at 22:44:30 Pacific
Subject: using a hub vs. a switch |
Reply: (edit)>> Plus that [hub] only work at 10 Mps Half Duplex. A slight error. Hubs can work at 10MBps, 100MBps, and 1000MBps. For example, Cisco Catalyst WSG5483 is a 1000 MBps - 1000 Base TX - Wireless Gigabit Ethernet HUB
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 6
|
Name: JackG
Date: January 26, 2005 at 13:38:04 Pacific
Subject: using a hub vs. a switch |
Reply: (edit)One valid use of a hub is if you want to monitor traffic on a link. You can put a hub between a modem and a router, connect a second system to the hub and use packet trace software to monitor the flow between the modem and router. You can also do this to monitor packets to/from a specific system. Not something the normal user would every be doing, but a network administrator or tech might do trying to track down a problem.
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 7
|
Name: OrionCA
Date: January 26, 2005 at 15:25:07 Pacific
Subject: using a hub vs. a switch |
Reply: (edit)If there's only one client to the hub it works a bit faster than a switch in the same configuration. You might use one as a "repeater" station to extend the distance a packet can travel in a network. If you have a client 400m from the server, put a hub between them @200m to refresh the packets, that sort of thing.
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 8
|
Name: wanderer
Date: January 27, 2005 at 12:45:27 Pacific
Subject: using a hub vs. a switch |
Reply: (edit)The Cisco Catalyst WS G5483 appears to be a gbic module not a hub. http://www.insight.ca/apps/productpresentation/index.php?product_id=CIS262619 http://www.critechsystems.com/WS-G5483/
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
Use following form to reply to current message: