Computing.Net > Forums > Networking > USB Ethnet Adapter vs Ethnet card

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

USB Ethnet Adapter vs Ethnet card

Reply to Message Icon

Name: BWB
Date: March 13, 2007 at 10:45:15 Pacific
OS: Windows XP
CPU/Ram: 2.66 500M
Product: HP
Comment:

I am thinking of using a USB 10/100 Ethernet Adapter, as opposed to a traditional 10/100 Ethernet card for home networking.

If I did this, and assuming it is USB 2.0, then what kind of performance (throughput) could I expect – relative to a 10/100 Ethernet card?

Thanks,
Burke



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: jefro
Date: March 13, 2007 at 16:27:56 Pacific
Reply:

Faster than you would need it in most cases. While I agree there may or may not be a bit of overhead on a usb most people never use even a 10bT speed. See the taskmanager network graph or setup a performance monitor to see your current nic speeds.

Now if you had a server level card then you'd see a major speed improvement. They are designed to offload cpu resources and they cost more because of it.

I read it wrong and answer it wrong too. So get off my case you goober.


0

Response Number 2
Name: wanderer
Date: March 13, 2007 at 20:41:26 Pacific
Reply:

I don't think you would notice any difference in your internet access between the two.

Are you ready for where Microsoft wants you to go today?


0

Response Number 3
Name: SCX_Tyler
Date: March 14, 2007 at 03:21:47 Pacific
Reply:

10/100 internet adapter (usb or pci) would have a max data rate of 100mbps
usb has a max data rate of 480mbps
according to http://www.pcguide.com/ref/mbsys/bu...
pci has a max data rate of 130~mbps
so the only read difference is that the usb would be easy to swap from computer to computer but would also take up space outside the computer and the internal might cost less, but you gotta pop upen your computer and install it (wich would take only a miniute or so if you know what you are doing)


0

Response Number 4
Name: wanderer
Date: March 14, 2007 at 08:11:11 Pacific
Reply:

I would expect a bit of overhead with USB just because its the nature of the beast. But 100mb is 100mb so you should see no difference

Give a person a fish, they eat for a day. Suggest they internet search and they learn a skill for a lifetime.


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Related Posts

See More







Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Networking Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: USB Ethnet Adapter vs Ethnet card

Usb adapter vs network card www.computing.net/answers/networking/usb-adapter-vs-network-card/26946.html

Usb network adapter issue www.computing.net/answers/networking/usb-network-adapter-issue/13908.html

Onboard Netcard vs. Net Card www.computing.net/answers/networking/onboard-netcard-vs-net-card/23869.html