Computing.Net > Forums > Networking > Server virtualization data center & ISCSI SAN

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Server virtualization data center & ISCSI SAN

Reply to Message Icon

Name: chris30
Date: August 6, 2009 at 18:08:25 Pacific
OS: NA
CPU/Ram: NA
Product: N/a / NA
Subcategory: Servers
Comment:

I currently work as the single network administrator for a medium size business. We currently have 10 servers that run many different network services and apps. I am considering implementing server virtualization; however, I am a little confused about the infrastructure design necessities. My main reason to implement server virtualization is create much better disaster recovery and a failover solutions for network apps (especially mission critical apps), especially for a very small IT staff (me). My quesition is, is an ISCSI SAN really necessary for server virtualization? I was considering running two high end, beefed up servers running Xenserver (w/ Xenserver essentials) and creating a HA and failover infrastructure using that method. Other than offering more disk storage space, is an ISCSI SAN really necessary to create a virtural data center that offers HA and failover?



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: jefro
Date: August 6, 2009 at 19:44:30 Pacific
Reply:

Might look at Sun's offering. They have most or all of that.

Otherwise you can run a linux system like that.

If you want that on MS get out the check book.

"Best Practices", Event viewer, host file, perfmon, antivirus, anti-spyware, Live CD's, backups, Make an autorun.inf folder on all usb drives.


0

Response Number 2
Name: wanderer
Date: August 7, 2009 at 08:20:21 Pacific
Reply:

chris30 you are mixing clustering with virtualization.

A cluster requires a SAN since there needs to be shared storage so if one cpu goes down the other still provides the path to the data.

Virtualization is where you host other OS's/Apps on the same box.

You can combine the two but at that point you need to go to blade servers. If the company can only afford you they can't afford blades.

There are a number of standard strategies for system failover. What you choose lands somewhere between what is acceptable downtime and cost of failover.

First level is mirrored/raided drives with hot spares
Then there is a regular backup that is tested after each backup.
Next is spare system replacement hardware or a vendor maintenance contract that replaces failed hardware in 4 hours.

After these basics you get into all sorts of different scenerios. Even virtualization requires those basics to be met.

So what business is the company in what is an acceptable level of downtime?


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Related Posts

See More


Internet Cuts out on all ... Can't Access XP Pro Share...



Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Networking Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Server virtualization data center & ISCSI SAN

SAN storage medium www.computing.net/answers/networking/san-storage-medium/32853.html

Need advice/assistance for LAN/SAN www.computing.net/answers/networking/need-adviceassistance-for-lansan/34454.html

Server Suggestions www.computing.net/answers/networking/server-suggestions/35772.html