Remote Access
|
Original Message
|
Name: knockem
Date: November 22, 2005 at 14:45:16 Pacific
Subject: Remote AccessOS: xpCPU/Ram: intel 512mb |
Comment: Is there any good/recommended Remote Desktop software? Ones which is good enough to get through NAT security when trying to access a PC via ADSL connection. -- For remote support purpose. Thank You!
Report Offensive Message For Removal
|
|
Response Number 2
|
Name: heropsycho2177
Date: November 22, 2005 at 16:57:47 Pacific
Subject: Remote Access |
Reply: (edit)If you have XP Pro, it has Remote Desktop (formerly known as Terminal Services) built in. Just forward port 3389 to the PC you want to control in your router. Please help survivors of Hurricane Katrina.www.redcross.org
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 3
|
Name: heropsycho2177
Date: November 22, 2005 at 16:59:03 Pacific
Subject: Remote Access |
Reply: (edit)http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/mobility/getstarted/remoteintro.mspx Please help survivors of Hurricane Katrina.www.redcross.org
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 6
|
Name: heropsycho2177
Date: November 22, 2005 at 18:40:16 Pacific
Subject: Remote Access |
Reply: (edit)http://www.computing.net/networking/wwwboard/forum/27132.html Exhaustive discussion with some bickering, but it does show why RDP is the better way to go with Windows machines. VNC is a major security risk, especially if not used with SSH. Please help survivors of Hurricane Katrina!www.redcross.org
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 7
|
Name: knockem
Date: November 22, 2005 at 19:28:27 Pacific
Subject: Remote Access |
Reply: (edit)thanks guys! where can I find a copy of RDP? is it the same as the windows xp's remote desktop? if it is, I'm not sure if it can bypass firewall and NAT if the modem/router supports NAT.
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 8
|
Name: heropsycho2177
Date: November 22, 2005 at 20:20:54 Pacific
Subject: Remote Access |
Reply: (edit)Forward port 3389. And again, read this... http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/mobility/getstarted/remoteintro.mspx Please help survivors of Hurricane Katrina!www.redcross.org
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 10
|
Name: heropsycho2177
Date: November 22, 2005 at 22:22:39 Pacific
Subject: Remote Access |
Reply: (edit)A textbook example of statistical drift if I've ever seen one... Please help survivors of Hurricane Katrina!www.redcross.org
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 11
|
Name: Bryco
Date: November 23, 2005 at 04:47:27 Pacific
Subject: Remote Access |
Reply: (edit)If you don't have control over the NAT then you will not find a remote desktop program that can bypass it. The NAT/router is a hardware firewall and that is what they do; block intrusions. They must be configured to allow the passthrough for the remote desktop. Bryan
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 12
|
Name: heropsycho2177
Date: November 23, 2005 at 06:35:12 Pacific
Subject: Remote Access |
Reply: (edit)The only way it could conceivably work is if the computer being controlled initiated the connection attempt to some central computer (kinda like a chat client). Not only do I not know of a remote access that does that, I wouldn't want remote access to do this. Please help survivors of Hurricane Katrina!www.redcross.org
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
Use following form to reply to current message: