Computing.Net > Forums > Networking > Network Speed + Performance

Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.

Network Speed + Performance

Reply to Message Icon

Name: Saleh
Date: February 14, 2003 at 18:01:16 Pacific
OS: w2k
CPU/Ram: 1600,256
Comment:

Hi
we have 7 clients and 1 server running win2000 server
the server has a dual processors P3 1GHZ,1GB RAM and 3 SCSI HDD

when i try to copy files from the clients to the server or the other way round i get about 4mb the Maximum is 5mb per a second
even on the fastest client i get same speed

*All computers are connected on 100mb hub
*The distance been all the computers is less than 15 meters
*the data that i tried to copy from the server is located on Stripe Volume (2 HDDs as 1 drive) and this should improve writing performance

is the speed iam getting ok?

what is the maximum can you get from a network running on 100mb hub+NIC?

what do i need to get a better performance in terms of copying?

if the drive that content the data is compressed will it slow the copying speed?

Thanx 4 UR Help
Saleh



Sponsored Link
Ads by Google

Response Number 1
Name: brad_002
Date: February 14, 2003 at 21:26:38 Pacific
Reply:

Last question first: compression does slow reading as well as writing.

Network speed: keep in mind that a 100 mbit hub actually has a theoretical maximum speed of 100/8 = 12.5 megabytes/sec. One megabyte is actually 8 megabits, and they measure hard drive space and memory with megabytes, and network speed in bits. So if you're getting 5 megabytes/sec, that's almost 50% of the theoretical maximum (which can never actually be reached) and that's pretty darn good. I'd be happy with that. You might be able to get it going a little faster by uncompressing your data, but it really doesn't sound like that's necessary. You're getting good-average performance from your network, probably because of your short cable distance, your 100mbit hub. Afterthought: using a switch instead of a hub would reduce collisions to almost 0 and might speed it up a little, but it doesn't really sound like that's necessary because you're getting good speed and you only have 7 clients. At my high school we run 30-computer labs off one 100mbit hub and everything runs fine.


0

Response Number 2
Name: Trip
Date: February 15, 2003 at 21:08:49 Pacific
Reply:

Hub = shared bandwidth, collisions = slow network

Switch = point to point dedicated bandwidth, few if any collisions = fast network

Even though you run a small network a switch may still help out a bit. It would be more noticable as your network traffic increases from multiple computers. Brand/type of NICs can make a small but measurable difference too as well as high quality cabling.

If you really need a lot of bandwidth between computers then you may want to look into gigabit, if you have enough money for the investment.


0

Sponsored Link
Ads by Google
Reply to Message Icon

Related Posts

See More







Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Networking Forum Home


Sponsored links

Ads by Google


Results for: Network Speed + Performance

Network Speed www.computing.net/answers/networking/network-speed/23231.html

network speed www.computing.net/answers/networking/network-speed/8121.html

Slow network speeds www.computing.net/answers/networking/slow-network-speeds/6637.html