Tom's Guide | Tom's Hardware | Tom's Games
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
I have a 3-story building with DSL on the first floor. I want to hardwire an ethernet cable to the third floor because wireless does not reach (we tried boosters). I was thinking DSL modem to a 4-port router. Then one ethernet cable to 3rd floor (PC) then one ethernet cable to 1st floor (Mac). 1st Floor has an Apple Airport Express that ethernet cable goes into for wireless network. 3rd floor has another router (also wireless) so that they can have both a wirless network and cable (which is desired). Is there any problems with two routers wired like this? Is this the best way to do this? I really want the third floor to have a hirewire to have the most flexiblity. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

That setup should work fine. Just go from the router on the 1st floor to the wan port of the router on the 3rd floor.

The below diagram gives you the recommended router to router config.
http://kbserver.netgear.com/kb_web_files/N101236.asp
Understand you need to have some security concerns.
1. going to allow anyone in the neighborhood to attach wirelessly?
2. all pcs will be in the same ip subnetRecommendation is do ip address reservations in the router so only the matching pcs mac address can go thru the router. This also will allow for static ip assignments using dhcp from the router.
I would also recommend loading Zonealarm on the pcs and then configuring them not to trust the other ip addresses so there is not chance of someone in the apt complex from getting to some other apts pcs/mac
Give a person a fish, they eat for a day. Suggest they internet search and they learn a skill for a lifetime.

additional recommendation: on small networks have the minimum number of routers you can. Each router adds complexity.
You've got one already. You should have another one for the Mac's (I assume? - Mac experts out there...?) But the wireless device for the PCs need only be an access point. That's all those 3rd floor PC's are doing - accessing a wired LAN and router. They are not needing routing to another network. Access Points are cheaper and much simpler.

actually, access points are more expensive than wireless routers.
no extra router required for the mac or airportGive a person a fish you feed them for a day.
Ask a person to internet search and they learn a skill for a lifetime.

UPDATE:
I ran out of time last night, but this is the hook-up so far. Modem to router (Linksys Model No. WRT54G, 2.4 GHz 802.11g Wireless-G Broadband Router). Then one ethernet to 3rd floor, and a second to an Apple Airport Express for the 1st floor. I changed the router name and password, but no security. Modem is DCHP. Everything works.
Firehawk335 suggested I connect into the WAN port of the second router (note, same Linksys model, was planning on using it as a wireless station for the 3rd floor), however there is no WAN port on the Linksys router. My friend, who bought the equpiment at a local computer store, said the sales person noted two routers would not work together and he should buy a switch which has an uplink port. So currently, I have one opened router working and another router and a switch in sealed boxes. Not sure how to proceed.
One last thought. I could put the modem and wireless Linksys router on the 3rd floor and run an ethernet cable down to the 1st floor to the Airport. The wire is already there.
Security is also a concern. I know I can turn on 128-bit encryption on the Airport. But what if encryption is turned on the router? Will it see the Airport?
Thanks in advance.

The airporter has nothing to do with your router. Its security won't effect the routers security.
If the 2nd router is the same as the first whatever port you have the modem connected to the router is the wan port on both.
Personally I would return the router and switch and get a managed switch with vlan support. Vlans allow you to securely divide the different floors from each other but still allow all internet access.
Give a person a fish, they eat for a day. Suggest they internet search and they learn a skill for a lifetime.

Looks good so far. In terms of "not being able to hook to routers together", that is wrong. You can certainly hook two routers together. However, going with a switch is another way to proceed. I would love to talk to that sales person and ask him if two routers can't be hooked together, how does he think the internet works? In terms of getting a managed switch with vlan support, that is probably quite pricey for your situation.
In terms of the security and airport, they can work securely with each other. You are basically creating a wireless bridge between the two units.
You can put the switch or router on your network where ever you need it and just hook to the uplink/wan port (it would be the same port in use between the 1st router and the modem). Or you can install the switch via the uplink port if there is one. If the switch has autonegotiation, you can use any port as an uplink port.

do you want separate IP LANs or not? As I wrote, minimize your routers. switch with vlan segregation seems to suit your needs best, as Wanderer suggested.
You have to get the following question straight in your mind: do you want to just provide access, or (also) organize access?
From your original post it seemed you just wanted to provide access. In that case, simple layer two devices, e.g. switches, are the way to go.
"If we don't succeed, we run the risk of failure." - BILL CLINTON

![]() |
wireless connects but can...
|
Wan vpn os x database
|

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.
| Ads by Google |