Computer Problems? Computing.Net has over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to start participating now! Also, be sure to check out the New User Guide.
Virus / Spyware immunity?
Name: ninja9578 Date: January 29, 2006 at 16:12:10 Pacific OS: XP CPU/Ram: centrino / 512
Comment:
I've heard a lot of claims that Macs are immune to viruses and spyware. From a programming standpoint I really don't understand how this is possible. Is it simply because Mac users are such a minority that no one writes spyware / viruses for them, or do they actually have some type of immunity. If so, please explain how it works.
Name: farkner66 Date: January 30, 2006 at 06:32:29 Pacific
Reply:
It's mainly because of the fact the userbase is a minority. Some Mac fanatics do write virri fro the platform but, I've never heard of it causing a major problem to a lot of users. There just aren't that many users who want to exploit the system; the fact that the Mac OS is radically different Windows also poses another factor in why the system is ocnsidered 'immune'. It isn't immune at all, really, it's just that people probably don't bother writing virii for Mac OS in the first place because they know it'll be easier and much more devistating to infect a Windows platform.
Afterall, let's face it, Windows has more security holes than the Mexico/USA border.
0
Response Number 2
Name: neo_9878 Date: February 1, 2006 at 01:05:40 Pacific
Reply:
I was woundering this myself. I'm barrowing a imac from a friend that wants to sell it, I'm kinda trying it out. So there is NO virus scanners for mac's? I kinda like that as I spend hours a month on slow dialup download updates for virus scanners on my window$ pc.
0
Response Number 3
Name: nephite Date: February 1, 2006 at 07:39:29 Pacific
Reply:
There were viruses for OS 9 but I am not aware of any for OS X. Studying Information Technology at college and managing a Macintosh Specialist store in Utah should have exposed me to any information contrary to this. Two main reasons for this are the UNIX foundation which is quite dissimilar from the Windows-DOS based format and the security implementations from Apple engineers. Not to say that there won't be one in the future but when Microsoft has to spend all their collective brain power creating a 300MB service pack to fix all their problems, is it no wonder that Windows Vista has been delayed for over two years now?
Summary: Ask a Mac user if a Mac is better, and he/she'll almost always say yes. I would suggest you keep asking questions and doing research. Here's my take, For one thing, Macs are immune to most, if not all...
Summary: Short explanation: pick either G5 or amd/intel. Long explanation: The G4 has been an antiquated processor since 2 years ago. It has hit a clock speed barrier, and will never go faster. Also, it runs o...
Summary: If you can afford it, I would say a Mac definately. It is rock solid, easy to use, and you don't spend your whole life maintaining/updating it and fighting off viruses/spyware. I am a Lan admin and...