Computing.Net > Forums > Mac > Reply to post: Powerbook 170 (...

Reply to post: Powerbook 170 (...

Reply to Message Icon

Original Message
Name: Johan W
Date: September 24, 2005 at 09:25:59 Pacific
Subject: Reply to post: Powerbook 170 (...
OS: System 7.1.1, Mac OS 9.2,
CPU/Ram: 68030, G4, Pentium
Comment:

Hi,

I happened to stumble across this thread when using Google: http://www.computing.net/mac/wwwboard/forum/11028.html

As I belive I have an answer to the question, I wrote a reply, only to recieve this message:

"You are trying to post a reply to a message that was posted quite a long time ago, May 24, 2005 at 17:21:53. Odds are that this reply will not be read by someone that can further help you with your problem. Please go to the appropriate forum by clicking here and post your question at that location."

I haven't been to this forum before, and I admit I don't know around what principles it works, but this appears to be a completely meaningless feature of a forum, and I haven't seen it anywhere else. What in earth would be the problem of sending a reply that I've already written to someone who might benefit from it? Also, there does not seem to be much though behind the message as it first (correctly) states that I'm trying to post a *reply* to a message, and then suggest that I should post my *question* in a new thread.

I suppose my question would be what in earth is the idea behind this.

Now, here is my reply in case the person behind the original message by any chance would read this post:

-----------

Hi!

I presume that the sound you're experiencing at startup is either the 4-tone sequence indicating "Hardware failure" or the 8-tone sequence indicating "RAM failure".

In case of the latter, the problem most likely isn't at bad as it sounds. The RAM expansion card (on models with more than 2 MB of RAM) on this and similar Powerbook models have a tendency to spring loose slightly and loose contact with the board it is connected to, which will result in this error. What you will need to do is this:

1. Using a size 8 and a size 10 torx screwdriver, unscrew the four screws at the bottom of the computer and the small screw on the rear connector panel.

2. With the bottom of the computer facing downwards, lift up the top case and carefully disconnect the cable connecting the display to the motherboard. Be very careful no to touch any of the components inside the computer as many of them are very sensitive to damage from static electricity.

3. Carefully lift up the RAM expansion card (the small card connected to the daughterboard at the top left corner) without touching any of the contacts, and then push it back in place again.

4. Reconnect the display cable and put the top case back in place. Put the screws back in and start the computer. Hopefully it will start up properly.

In case of the 4-tone error sequence, I'm afraid either the hard drive or the floppy drive (or both) will need to be replaced. Eventually, it could also be a problem with the motherboard.

I hope you solve the problem! I own a Powerbook 170 myself, and it's a really nice computer.

Good luck!

Ps. A small tip: there was a problem with the original power adapter of the PowerBook 1XX series which could burn out the fuse on the motherboard, or damage the motherboard itself. In order to prevent this, always connect the power cord to the computer BEFORE the adapter is plugged into the outlet. Ds.


Report Offensive Message For Removal


Response Number 1
Name: Johan W
Date: September 24, 2005 at 09:51:09 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

Ah, I see that this forum makes people's e-mail adddresses publicly available. That helps! Gosh...


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 2
Name: Slim Vision
Date: September 24, 2005 at 11:01:08 Pacific
Reply: (edit)

It does? Better not, I don't want people knowing my address. Though I agree with you about it being a rediculous 'feature'. It didn't always used to be like this either. But for some reason they've now imposed the restriction that you can't post to messages older than a month or so...

On the one hand I can see why they've done this, not that I agree with it, but I can just see 'why' they don't want people posting replies to old messages... But on the other hand, this wouldn't be a problem if they had some decent forum software installed.

Right now the software can't email users of replies, and messages that are replied to be they old or new don't get 'bumped' back to the top of the list. It's rather old and outdated really and needs bringing into the 21st century.

I also find the adverts they've put on the forums by slecting keywords and making them links so when your mouse pointer hovers over them a rudy great advert pops up highly off-putting.

Actually... Now I come to think of it, computing.net really has gone down hill of late. Shame, I used to like this place.

Slim Vision


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal







Use following form to reply to current message:

   Name: From My Computing.Net Settings
 E-Mail: From My Computing.Net Settings

Subject: Reply to post: Powerbook 170 (...

Comments:

 


  Homepage URL (*): 
Homepage Title (*): 
         Image URL: 
 
Data Recovery Software




Have you ever used OpenOffice?

Yes, as my main suite.
Yes, occationally.
Yes, but only once.
No, never.


View Results

Poll Finishes In 6 Days.
Discuss in The Lounge