Tom's Guide | Tom's Hardware | Tom's Games
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
So, in anticipation of going off to college next year
for engineering, i've run into a snag, in that nearly all
of the engineering programs available are PC
only....Now, while this wouldnt be a problem
normally, as i could run Virtual PC, it is in fact a
problem, because Virtual PC doesnt support 3D
graphics, which i obviously need for
engineering...So, at present, I'm stuck with getting a
PC (which i desperatly do not want), so if there are
any other solutions, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE e-mail
me ASAP and let me know so that I can get out of
getting a PC....realize that I need to run PC programs
in a 2D and 3D environment.Thanks

I don't think there is a solution. In general, the x86
emulators for Macs are pretty sketchy at best. I use
VPC 6 at times, and it's tolerable, but I wouldn't dare
run anything intensive on it.----paxcirc.a-

Check:
http://www.versiontracker.com/macosx/
index.shtmlfor OS X 3D Software
(though not much hope @ this time)
- still - a DFX is a DFX regardless of platform, no?or
bump up your RAM to maximum capacity in
conjunction with Virtual PC 6.cw

If you can find a Mac-based solution for working with the files you need - and I don't know what that would be, since I don't know what sort of programs you'd be using on the PC side - then there's hope.
Keep in mind OS X is the world's largest UNIX distribution, so a lot of stuff that runs on *nix will run on OS X, either with X11 or with a simple recompile.
p

Well, I believe I remember reading that virtual pc 3 supported 3d graphics better than current versions. Also, programs will run significantly better in emulation using os 9 (and many current macs have duel boot os 9/os x.

Uh, VPC 3 is four years old. Not really applicable any more.
VPC 6, which is OS X-native, is far better than anything previous.
However, if you absolutely need a Windoze PC for some stuff, have you considered picking up a cheap POS PC just for that purpose, and using a Mac for everything else?
p

You might be surprised at the amount of engineering
software you can come across for the Apple
platform. Your school might be Windows-centric,
but I wouldn't rule out availability of
comparable Apple software.That being said, I think the best thing to do is ask
some people in the engineering department of your
college what exactly you need. Have you actually
been told that you'll need all these PC programs
you've seen? Ask an upperclassmen what he uses his
own personal computer for -- if it was anything like
my experience, he'll tell you he used it to surf the
web and type up some reports in Microsoft Word.I'll be beginning a Ph.D. program in nanoscale
materials engineering this fall, and my bachelor's
degree is in chemistry. I used a PC for the first 3
years of undergraduate work, and got a Mac when I
was a senior. To be honest, it made no
difference. I had to do a lot of computer
calculations, but it didn't make much difference if I
was working in Mathcad on my PC or Mathematica on
my Mac. The spectroscopy instruments we used
were all run by Windows software, but that didn't
matter because we did that work in the lab anyway.The overwhelming burden of work for the
undergraduate science major, on his own computer
anyway, is making his data look pretty in nice graphs
and typing a nice write-up. So unless they tell
you otherwise, I'd get a Mac and be happy.

This A.A.S. grad (lithographic
technologies) is glad he uses the
preferred platform of all these brainiacs
and rocket scientists.

![]() |
![]() |
![]() |

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.
| Ads by Google |