|
| Computing.Net: Over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to sign up now, it's free! |
I'm switching from PC to Mac.
|
Original Message
|
Name: tik
Date: January 28, 2002 at 13:59:18 Pacific
Subject: I'm switching from PC to Mac. |
Comment: My last two PC's have driven me crazy with conflicts, slowdowns and incompatible software. Does anyone have advice for a PC user switching to Mac? Am I going to be going to absolute step 1 in my learning? Is internet navigation similar? How do emulators work? Do I need 'Dave' or anything to run a router to share cable net service with a 'Wintel' machine? What have been your experiences in the switch? I've heard that once you go to a Mac, you don't go back to a Wintel machine.
Report Offensive Message For Removal
|
|
Response Number 1
|
Name: fieraci
Date: January 28, 2002 at 17:02:46 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)Will you be at step one? No. There will be an initial learning curve, but it's steep. Intuition is your friend here in the world of Apples. --- Internet navigation similar? Similar, but...It's easier. --- Emulators? They run a mac rom in software, and allow the running of the mac OS. They are somewhat clumsy. You want a mac, get a mac. --- Need Dave with Router? No. Routers throw out signal to an IP address. Every computer has one. ---
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 2
|
Name: tik
Date: January 28, 2002 at 19:14:08 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)I admit my total ignorance here. I wanted to buy a Mac as my first computer, but I took the advice of my friends and family. Then, after that computer was a disaster (It's not an understatement to say that NOTHING worked right), I almost bought an iMac, but was told it was too expensive for its speed and capability. I didn't know then that mhz is not necessarily the only measurement of total computer speed. I also didn't know I could add firewire and USB cdrw's and peripherals so easily. This is what I use my computer for: 1) Making digital music via AcidPro, Fruity Loops, Cool Edit Pro, and various plug ins. I use cracked software now, because I only pay for software when I absolutely need to--not because I'm a mooch or anything, but because I feel that the time I have to spend MAKING THESE PROGRAMS WORK RIGHT is unreasonable and I'm not compensated for it. 2)Downloading mp3 files and discovering new music. Sources tell me there will be a Mac version of Morpheus up soon. 3)Burning CD's. 4)Surfing the net. 5)Word Processing and schoolwork. Considering that, is the new, redesigned iMac a good choice? I'm willing to pay for a program called 'Reason' for the Mac that's supposed to have everything as far as music making goes. Will Apple survive for the lifespan of the new iMac? Are they in trouble so serious that the company might fail? One clarification...the Emulator I'm talking about is Virtual PC..for running Wintel programs on a Mac...not the other way around. The more I learn about Apples, the more I like them. It's a shame I have to keep slogging along with my wintel machine until I can afford a new iMac (September at the earliest).
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 3
|
Name: MTP
Date: January 28, 2002 at 22:51:38 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)I agree with the statement "Once Mac never back". I started out as a PC user (luckily my first PC was given to me), but for nastalgia (I remembered the Apple ][e in school) reasons decided to give Apple a try. Now, I would never go back to using a PC. I have a home network and the only reason a PC is on it is because it routes my IP service and there's some software I have that is PC only. The learning curve is there, but Macs are some much simpler to configure and learn it won't be a problem. I think the new iMac would be a great first Mac. They now come with G4 proccessors and I hear (I have a Powermac) are basically take out of the box, hook up the wires, and go. All in all, I think you'll be much happier with a Mac and any extra $ you spent you'll feel was well worth it.
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 4
|
Name: tik
Date: January 29, 2002 at 05:41:01 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)I've heard the new iMac comes with two firewire ports, and that the iPod and iTunes sync up to the point where transfer of mp3s is nearly effortless. How many PCs come with that standard? How about wireless networking? I don't want to upgrade my PC. Every upgrade I've made, from software upgrades to hardware upgrades, has resulted in a buggier system. I won't play games (except perhaps games like Diablo...cause they're so simple) on PC anymore. I bought an Xbox for that. Do you know why I don't play games on my PC? Every time I put a game on my system, I had to spend hours downloading patches and debugging the system (usually the brilliant M$ Windows OS). Do the people at ZDnet have an agenda that includes pushing Macs? The writers there have numerously mentioned the ease of use that comes bundled with a Mac. I see the fact that Apple creates hardware and software to be a bonus..it means that they know they are responsible when the OS and Hardware conflict. Microsoft doesn't take you seriously when there's a conflict, because they know that more than half the time, it isn't their fault and there wasn't anything they could do to prevent it. I have to give Microsoft credit..they're trying to do the best they can with absolutely NO control of hardware. Intel is cranking out chips that are are fast from a mhz perspective but are nonetheless outperformed in benchmark tests by AMD chips that are significantly lower in pure mhz power. What freedoms do PCs bring? The freedom to upgrade? If the damn thing was put together with foresight, I shouldn't NEED to upgrade it. I didn't upgrade my PSone...I bought new gaming hardware. If you took all the money you spend on upgrades while paying yourself for the time you invest in making your upgrades 'play nice', you could use that money to buy a new computer every 4-6 years. Tell me I'm wrong. Explain it to me, cause I've wasted several thousand dollars on PCs and software that are criminally underwhelming.
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 5
|
Name: Jperro
Date: January 29, 2002 at 06:04:52 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)Once an Apple, never a piece of crap (PC)! Welcome to the 21st century, I feel sorry for all those who are still rubbing sticks to start a fire.
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 6
|
Name: pb
Date: January 30, 2002 at 12:56:47 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)QUOTE: "PC means freedom, Mac means dictatorship. PC is innovation, Mac is bundling (from software to hardware) monopoly." Monopoly??? Microsoft is much more of a monopoly than Apple. I think your arguments are somewhat one-sided. Very strange.
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 7
|
Name: kellyjay
Date: January 31, 2002 at 09:32:18 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)tik, You didn't say what Mac you were buying.. Yes, they connect with PC's and router with no problem. Forget any emulation software/VPC etc. If you are getting a Mac, get a Mac. If you have a PC then use it... Both is best, depending on what you do. I use both, and find it useful. Yes, the Macs have FW/USB and play some games. check it out, buy a used/recon G3/G4 or even a iMac to check them out. Let us know what happens..kudos
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 8
|
Name: frobro
Date: January 31, 2002 at 17:32:11 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)i'm a pc user. I'll give apple this: their hardware is better. but though windows does suck, i would have to say it's better than macos. except perhaps osx, since it's bsd based. but then i suppose it all depends on what you want out of your system. windows: large inventory of software/games linux: stability and free/cheap software beos: awsome for multimedia but little else macos: userfriendlyness/ease of use
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 9
|
Name: the pickle
Date: January 31, 2002 at 17:55:06 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)Windoze: large inventory of junky software. Major titles are available on both platforms and manage to handle files created on either platform reasonably well. Latest games if that's important to you. My general philosophy here is that if gaming is THAT important, but a PlayStation 2 is better and cheaper. Oh, and something like 80,000 known viruses. Mac OS: fewer than a thousand virsues (if you exclude macro viruses, this drops to under 100), enough software that you can do anything you can do on Windoze, and consistency of the interface/ease of use that FAR surpasses any other platform as yet. http://www.apple.com/myths/ is a great URL to check out. Linux: only if you love to dink around with your computer. A lot. BeOS: no applications. If you think Macs don't have any apps, BeOS will make the Mac look like Windoze as far as availability of applications. p
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 10
|
Name: irene
Date: February 12, 2002 at 05:37:54 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)I've always worked on Mac's, and we have also got a PC at home. I think the Mac's are much, much better. A PC is a very bad copy of a Mac. Mac is more comfortable to work with, they crash less, and they are less sensitive for virusses. And besides... who wants to give Bill Gates money?
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 11
|
Name: dave
Date: May 17, 2002 at 22:50:57 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)At my office: The State of California, "they" the HQ people in Sacramento have decided that Apple products don't fit into the Pure IP standard that Information Technology just adopted for the entire State. Talk about a lack of freedom. I have a G4 at work that hardly ever crashes, prints flawlessly, surfs the internet like a speedy zapato, it's so realiable, and I am being forced onto a PC with 256M of RAM, Pentium 3 machine. I am bummed. Apple where is your sales force and marketing team? Anybody else work for the Stae and is getting their MAC yanked?
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|
|
Response Number 12
|
Name: Vidar
Date: July 17, 2002 at 22:58:20 Pacific
|
Reply: (edit)>Windoze: large inventory of junky software. Major titles are available on both platforms and manage to handle files created on either platform reasonably well. Latest games if that's important to you. My general philosophy here is that if gaming is THAT important, but a PlayStation 2 is better and cheaper. Oh, and something like 80,000 known viruses. >> Lets see, all of the major Mac apps such as Photoshop, illustrator etc is also available for the PC. I challenge you to name a Mac app that does not have an equivalent on the PC side! > Monopoly??? Microsoft is much more of a monopoly than Apple. I think your arguments are somewhat one-sided. Very strange. > In the OS I guess you are partly right. But ponder on this: with a Wintel you have hundreds/thousands of choices when it comes to desktop, notebooks and software. In the wintel side you can get AMD, you can get intel, you can get transmeta. In more complete packages you can get Dell, you can get IBM, you can get Toshiba. Apple you are stuck with their slow and expensive hardware. Want me to prove it? http://www.barefeats.com/pentium4.html http://macspeedzone.com/archive/html/ hardw/misc/a/win_vs_mac/ray.html http://www.azillionmonkeys.com/qed/ apple.html http://www.geocities.com/sw_perf/ http://www.highend3d.com/tests/maya/ testcenter/database.3d Not that I'm discouraging anybody to not get a Mac but please get your facts straight!!!
Also a Mac and a playstation2 combined is more expensive than just buying a PC. For the original poster, if you want a Mac than by all means get one
Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal
|

|

|

Post Locked
This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.
Go to Mac Forum Home
|
|
|